Commit translated books batch0 and in-progress works

batch0-21/55/70/75/76/77/78/79/91: nine reviewed books — each with
source.dj, target.dj, edit-suggestions.dj, review-findings.dj and source
docx. All nine pass the 11-check translation gate; reviews applied in the
direct-edit pass on 2026-08-07 (bilingual.dj regenerated, not committed).

我们靠什么认识世界: incorporate human review into source/target; drop
stale review files.

第22课 传递善意,点亮心灯, 静心学堂学员手册: new in-progress projects.
This commit is contained in:
iacore
2026-08-08 12:54:18 +08:00
parent 63150a9f26
commit 7b92da7335
53 changed files with 15137 additions and 147 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
# Edit Suggestions for 78 *Understanding Bodhicitta*
Translator: AI (self-review)
Date: 2026-08-06
## Summary
Self-review complete. No must-fix issues found. The translation preserves the
source's 537-line structure, terminology is consistent with the MPI terms
database, and the speaker's voice (语气) is maintained throughout. Below are
notes on deliberate terminology choices and minor observations.
## Terminology Decisions
### Core terms (consistent with terms DB)
| Chinese | English | Source |
|---------|---------|--------|
| 菩提心 | bodhicitta | Standard Buddhist term |
| 凡夫心 | ordinary mind | 佛教术语 |
| 出离心 | renunciation | 佛教术语 |
| 空性见 | view of emptiness | 佛教术语 |
| 我执 | self-grasping | DoT preliminary |
| 胜义菩提心 | ultimate bodhicitta | 佛教术语, DoT定稿 |
| 正见 | right view | BAICKZ |
### Contextual renderings
- **发心**: Rendered as "aspiration" for general contexts, "generate bodhicitta"
when explicitly referring to 发菩提心. This contextual split is necessary
because the Chinese term shifts meaning between general aspiration and the
specific generation of bodhicitta.
- **法执**: Rendered as "dharma-grasping" parallel to "self-grasping" for 我执,
maintaining the symmetrical terminology of Yogācāra.
- **六度四摄**: "Six perfections and four means of gathering" — follows
established project convention.
- **愿菩提心 / 行菩提心**: "Aspiring bodhicitta" / "Engaging bodhicitta" —
standard renderings from Śāntideva's *Bodhicaryāvatāra* tradition.
### Sanskrit diacritics
Applied consistently: Māra, Śāriputra, Pūrṇamaitrāyaṇīputra, Śāntideva, Atiśa,
Tsongkhapa, Mañjuśrī, Kṣitigarbha, Avalokiteśvara, Samantabhadra, Amitābha,
Bhaiṣajyaguru, Maitreya, Subhūti, Śākyamuni, Milarepa, Dharmamati, Śakra,
Dharmākara, Lokeśvararāja, Siṃhavikrīḍitapūrṇavikāsatathāgata, *Yogācārabhūmi*,
*Bodhicaryāvatāra*, *Avatamsaka*, *Lamrim*, *Madhyānta-vibhāga*, etc.
### Style notes
- **Speaker's voice**: Venerable Jiqun's 语气 is preserved — first-person
asides ("I find...", "I believe..."), rhetorical questions kept as questions,
reasoning connectives ("Therefore", "Thus", "In fact"), concrete everyday
analogies unvarnished, gentle admonition without scolding tone.
- **Hinayana**: Used where the source uses 小乘 in pedagogical contrast.
Consider whether "Śrāvakayāna" would be more appropriate for future editions
— this is a deliberate choice to mirror the source's register rather than
impose modern academic convention.
- **Tripiṭaka**: Sanskrit term kept for 三藏十二部.
- **Humanistic Buddhism**: Used for 人生佛教 per established convention (cf.
Master Taixu's "Buddhism for Human Life").
## No corrections needed
Three-pass review (accuracy, fluency, Dharma fitness) and R1R14 editorial
polish complete. No missing content, no calques, no terminology drift, no
formatting issues found. Line counts verified: source 537 = target 537.
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
# Review Findings for 78 *Understanding Bodhicitta*
Reviewer: independent translation review (source.dj vs target.dj)
Date: 2026-08-07
Method: full line-by-line comparison of all 537 source/target line pairs
(blank-line alignment verified 1:1; all 19 blockquote headings match; every
paragraph spot-read against the source, including all truncated long lines).
Overall verdict: the translation is complete (no missing sections, no added
material), doctrinally sound, and fluent. No critical errors. Two major
accuracy defects and one omission need fixing; the rest are consistency and
polish items. Note: edit-suggestions.dj (2026-08-06) reports "no must-fix
issues" — this review found two must-fix items it missed (Major 1 and 2).
## Critical
None found. No doctrinal inversions, no dropped passages, no fabricated
content. All scripture quotes checked against their Chinese sources render
correctly (e.g. *Avatamsaka* "忘失菩提心…是為魔業", *Diamond Sutra*
Subhūti passage, *Lamrim* common/uncommon cause, 受持菩提心 vow text).
## Major
### M1. 阿蘭那 rendered as "forest dwelling" (wrong word, internally incoherent)
Location: target.dj line 407 (§VII.5, Diamond Sutra Subhūti quote): "…the
World-Honored One would not say that Subhūti is one who delights in forest
dwelling. It is because Subhūti truly has nothing practiced that he is called
one who delights in forest dwelling."
Problem: 阿蘭那 is *araṇa* ("non-contention"), not *araṇya* ("forest"). The
same quote explicitly says two sentences earlier that Subhūti attained "the
samādhi of non-contention" (無諍三昧) — so "forest dwelling" is both a
mistranslation and contradicts the passage's own logic (the sutra glosses
阿蘭那 precisely as freedom from conflict, "實無所行").
Fix: "…the World-Honored One would not call Subhūti one who delights in
dwelling free of contention. Because Subhūti truly dwells nowhere / practices
nothing, he is called one who delights in dwelling free of contention." (Cf.
Red Pine: "foremost in the practice of no-contention.")
### M2. Factor-of-ten errors in the eon-count chain of the first analogy
Location: target.dj line 169 (§IV.1, 初發心功德品 analogy).
Problem: the chain is correct up to 百億劫 ("ten billion eons", ✓), then
inflates by 10×:
- 千億劫 → "a trillion eons" — should be "a hundred billion eons" (千億 = 10¹¹).
- 百千億劫 → "a hundred trillion eons" — should be "ten trillion eons" (10¹³).
- 那由他億劫 → "nayutas of billions of eons" — 億 here is a hundred million
(10⁸), as the translator correctly rendered two clauses earlier ("a hundred
million eons"); should be "a hundred million nayutas of eons".
- 百千那由他億劫 → "a hundred thousand nayutas of billions of eons" — same
correction ("a hundred thousand nayutas of hundred-millions", or better:
keep "nayuta" and the Chinese-style multiplier).
Fix: re-render the whole chain with one consistent numeral convention (億 =
hundred million everywhere), e.g. "…for ten billion eons … a hundred billion
eons … ten trillion eons … a hundred million nayutas of eons … a hundred
thousand nayutas of hundred-millions of eons …"
### M3. Omission: "每次三遍" dropped from the refuge-recitation instruction
Location: target.dj line 249 (§V.1): "we should recite day and night, three
times each session".
Problem: source 應晝夜各念誦「…」三次,每次三遍 = recite three times (each day
and each night), three repetitions each time. The "three repetitions per
recitation" detail is lost, changing the practice instruction.
Fix: "we should recite day and night, three times each, three repetitions
each time: '…'"
## Minor
### Terminology / consistency
1. 我法二執: rendered "the two attachments—to self and to phenomena" at line
37 but "the two graspings of self and phenomena" in six other places
(lines 101, 103, 301, 371, 437, 439). Unify to "two graspings" (matches
我執 "self-grasping" used throughout).
2. 優波尼沙陀 (line 173): transliterated "Upaniṣad / upaniṣadth /
upaniṣadfold" — collides with the Upaniṣads and coins awkward forms.
Fix: "one upaniṣad part … an upaniṣad-fold … Upaniṣad is a Sanskrit
numeral, the largest unit of quantity" — or use "upaniṣat" and gloss "a
large numerical unit (not the Upaniṣads)".
3. 億 rendered inconsistently: "hundred million" (line 169) vs "koṭi" (lines
233, 235, 357). At line 233, 二百一十億諸佛刹土 → "two hundred and ten
koṭis of buddha-lands" assumes 億 = koṭi (10⁷); the same passage is often
rendered 21 billion (億 = 10⁸). Either is defensible, but pick one
convention and apply it everywhere; add a translator's note for 233.
4. 《略論》 (line 271) rendered as "the *Lamrim*", indistinguishable from
《道次第》(the 廣論) cited at lines 11, 203, 205, 399, 447, 451. Fix:
"the *Abbreviated Lamrim*" (or *Lamrim Chungba*).
5. 正性離生 (line 219) → "definitive separation" loses 生 (birth).
Fix: "the stage of definitive deliverance [from rebirth]" or "definitive
freedom from birth".
6. 覺有情 gloss (line 375): "The term 'bodhisattva' comes from the Sanskrit
*bodhisattva*, meaning awakened being." Redundant (English term =
Sanskrit term) and 有情 is dropped. Fix: 'The term "bodhisattva" comes
from the Sanskrit *bodhisattva*, "awakened sentient being" — one who is
awakened and awakens others.'
7. 支那內學院 (line 63) → "Chinese Inner Studies Institute". Conventional
English name: "China Institute of Inner Learning". Fix to the attested
name.
8. 《顯揚聖教論》 (line 213) given as *Ārya-śāsana-prakaraṇa-śāstra*. The
standard reconstruction is *Āryavācāprakaraṇa-śāstra* (Sakuma). Verify
against the project's Sanskrit title list and correct.
9. 《大乘本生心地觀經》 (line 373) → "*Mahāyāna Sutra on the Contemplation
of the Mind-Ground*" drops 本生. Fix: "…Contemplation of the Originally
Arisen Mind-Ground" or keep short title and note the full title once.
10. 攝受最勝 (line 259) → "supremacy of inclusion". Awkward; the item means
being sustained/gathered by non-conceptual wisdom. Fix: "supremacy of
being sustained" or "supremacy of embrace (by non-conceptual wisdom)".
11. 因地: "causal ground" (5×) vs "causal stage" (line 413). Unify;
"causal stage" reads more naturally in English (e.g. "in his causal
stage, Amitābha was the monk Dharmākara").
12. "buddha-name recitation" (line 47) vs "Buddha-name recitation"
(line 131): capitalization inconsistent; unify.
### Fluency
13. Line 311: "Just as it takes two pieces of wood rubbed together
continuously to produce the spark of compassion and wisdom." — sentence
fragment (a "just as" clause with no main clause). Fix: "It is like
drilling wood to make fire: two sticks must be rubbed together
continuously before the spark of compassion and wisdom can be struck."
14. Line 61: "believing the treasury of Buddhist art holds rich treasures" —
treasury/treasures redundancy (source: 佛教藝術殿堂中有豐富的寶藏).
Fix: "believing the halls of Buddhist art hold rich treasures".
15. Line 13: "only the Chan and Pure Land schools maintained the widest
influence" — "only … widest" jars. Fix: "only the Chan and Pure Land
schools retained wide influence" or "…exerted the widest influence".
## Completeness
Verified complete: 537/537 line alignment, all ten sections (intro through
§X Q&A) and all 19 subsection headings present in matching order; every
paragraph accounted for with no additions or deletions beyond M3 above. The
Q&A section's eleven exchanges are all present and correctly attributed
(學員/法師 → Student/Venerable).
## Terminology (positive confirmation — no action needed)
Consistent, standard renderings throughout: 發心 aspiration; 菩提心
bodhicitta; 凡夫心 ordinary mind; 出離心 renunciation; 空性見 view of
emptiness; 我執 self-grasping; 遍計所執 imagined nature; 願/行/勝義菩提心
aspiring/engaging/ultimate bodhicitta; 七因果 sevenfold cause and effect;
增上意樂 extraordinary attitude; 自他相換 exchanging self and other; 三輪體空
threefold purity; 無緣大慈、同體大悲 unconditional great compassion and
shared-essence compassion; 趣寂聲聞 śrāvaka fixed on tranquillity; 國王/船夫/
牧人式發心 king-like/boatman-like/shepherd-like aspiration; 五種性 five
lineages; 十二種最勝 twelve supremacies; 四弘誓願 four great vows; 十大願王
ten great vow kings. Sanskrit names all correct (Pūrṇamaitrāyaṇīputra,
Dharmamati, Dharmākara, Lokeśvararāja, Gaganagañja, etc.). The 三十六萬億一十
一萬九千五百 Amitābha count (line 419) is computed correctly.
@@ -0,0 +1,537 @@
认识菩提心
------2003 年九月讲于戒幢佛学研究所
2003年9月,济群法师在戒幢佛学研究所为学员们开讲《认识菩提心》系列讲座。在为时一周的讲座中,法师从"普通人的发心”开始,层层深入,详尽阐述了如何正确发心、菩提心的殊胜、菩提心的发起因缘和菩提心的特征等问题。法师立足于华严的见地,结合唯识、中观的思想,及历代大德对菩提心教法的开示,并根据自身的修学体验,对菩提心教法作了全面总结和诠释,使一向被人们当作口号的菩提心教法,得以从理论走向实践。
"发心”这两个字,想必大家都很熟悉。我们经常会听到一些长辈要求我们发心,许多同辈之间彼此也会用发心来相互鼓励。但细究起来,有几个人能真正认识到其中的意义?又有几个人能将"发心”发得到位、发得准确、发得有水平?事实上是很少的。因而在很多情况下,发心似乎已经成了一句空洞的口号。
在大乘佛教的重要经典中,几乎都有关于发菩提心的教诫。《华严经》云:"忘失菩提心,修诸善根,是为魔业。”这句经文被省庵大师引用于《劝发菩提心文》,在汉传佛教界广为流传,发人深省。离开菩提心,在修行上的所有努力,都将成为生死之因。《大般若经》云:"云何菩萨摩诃萨普为利乐诸有情故乘于大乘?满慈子言:舍利子!若菩萨摩诃萨修行般若波罗蜜多时,以一切智智相应作意,大悲为首,用无所得而为方便。”一切智智相应作意,即菩提心。印顺法师在《学佛三要》中引用了这段经文,并提出大乘佛教的三大要领:菩提心、大悲心、空性见,充分说明了菩提心在菩萨道修行中的重要性。
《道次第》中,将修学佛法的要领归纳为三主要道,即出离心、菩提心、空性见。我觉得这一归纳非常精辟,发出离心不仅是为了个人解脱,更是作为菩提心生起的基础。因为大乘佛教是立足于菩提心,成佛就是菩提心的圆满成就,所以空性见也是为菩提心服务的。从菩提心的发起到成就,离不开空性见的引导。如果没有空性见,凡夫心尚且难以摆脱,何况无上菩提的成就?
汉传佛教属于大乘,但在中国的弘扬过程中,并没有很好地实践大乘精神。汉传各宗祖师在立宗设教时,虽然都有关于菩提心的专门论述,却未能引起后人的重视。唐宋以降,唯禅宗和净宗影响最为广泛。而禅宗和净宗的修行人,往往充满浓厚的出世色彩。修禅的无非是了脱生死,念佛的一心往生西方,也还是了脱生死。问题还在于,他们基本是以个人解脱为主。如果仅仅为了个人解脱而修行,显然不是大乘的发心。
为什么充满积极利世思想的大乘佛教,来到中国后演变为浓厚的出世色彩呢?根源就在于忽略了菩提心,在修行上不知不觉偏向以个人解脱为主。
大乘和小乘的区别在哪里?很多人往往会从教理上区别,似乎学习大乘教理就是菩萨行者,学习小乘教理则是声闻行者。其实并非如此,区别大小乘的关键是在于发心,和对发心的实践。如果我们发菩提心受持五戒,那么五戒就是大乘的五戒,是菩萨行的组成部分。如果只为个人解脱而发出离心,即使学习至圆至顿的《华严》,也算不上合格的大乘弟子。
在当前的佛教界,许多人对发菩提心的内涵缺乏了解。不知道怎样才是真正的发心?怎样将心发到位?发心到位之后又应该做些什么?如何使发心持续稳定地发展?对于这一系列问题,多数人不甚了了,菩提心自然也就无从发起。
要解决这些问题,我们先从普通人的发心谈起。
一、普通人的发心
这里所说的普通人,指社会上那些没有学佛的人,他们不自觉中也在发心。因为他们每天都会有无数想法:想锦衣玉食,想财源滚滚,想仕途畅通;更有甚者,还想着坑蒙拐骗,损人利己。事实上,每种想法都不是凭空而有的,皆有各自的心理基础。这个基础或是贪心,或是嗔心,或是我慢、嫉妒,乃至邪知邪见。这一心理基础,又会引发相应的行为。
> 1.凡夫心的形成
每个行为在完成过程中,一方面会成就客观上的事实,比如为谋利去开公司,经过几十年努力成就一番事业。而在另一方面,这一行为更成就了我们的凡夫心。如果开公司的心理基础是贪心,那么在经营过程中,对公司的贪著之心也会随之增长,最后这个公司就成为生命的重要组成部分。
社会上不少青年为了恋爱寻死觅活,他们并不是开始就严重到这一地步,不可能一见面就再也无法分开。也是经历了相恋的过程,使彼此的贪著之心越来越重,以至发展到无与伦比的程度,觉得失去对方就失去了整个精神支柱。
凡夫心正是这样不断滋养起来的。用唯识法义来理解,就是"种子生现行,现行熏种子”。这两句话虽然简单,但已将心行运作的规律揭露无遗。"种子生现行”是重复的过程,当然这不是简单的重复。因为心念的重复是变化的,会介入自身的经验和想法,最后形成贪心、嗔心、我慢、嫉妒等各种心行。尤其在现代社会,世风日下,人心不古,做事业要面临很多考验,甚至可以说是处处陷阱,往往使人不自觉地被各种诱惑所转。最后事业虽然成就了,内心世界却被染污得面目全非。
从这个意义上理解,发心就是通过外在的想法和行为,最终引发并成就自身的某种心理。所以说,我们每做一件事,不仅要考量客观结果,更要考量它究竟成就了怎样的心。事业是短暂的,而凡夫心的作用不仅会左右我们的今生,更会影响到未来。
世人以凡夫心为基础,产生种种想法及行为,因而成就了凡夫品质。所谓凡夫品质,从根本来说,就是我法二执及贪嗔痴烦恼。当然,每个人的执著有不同取向,从而展现出各自不同的性格特征。凡夫心的力量强弱,取决于我们对它的培养。习惯贪的人时刻都在张扬自己的贪心,习惯嗔恨的人时刻都在张扬自己的嗔心,这些现象我们很容易在生活中观察到。如果不反省并制止,贪心和嗔心随时都会寻找目标,采取行动。久而久之,使贪心和嗔心变得无比强大。
心灵是在重复中成长的,每重复一次就壮大一次。所以,我们必须对自己的一言一行乃至起心动念加以审视,及时调整。
> 2.良好心行的培养
每一种技能的获得,也要通过不断重复。比如我们学打球,必须反复练习才能形成正确的姿势。有些动作看似简单,但要学得规范并不容易。即使学会了,还需要经过相当时间的巩固。因为我们在此之前往往已形成某种习惯性的姿势,稍有松懈,马上会恢复到原有习惯中。只有在特别用心时,才会做出准确的姿势。
事实上,行为习惯也代表着心灵习惯,两者是统一的。但从心灵到行为的落实,确实需要通过训练。这种训练可能要百次、千次、万次,随时将自己的观念和行为调整到正确状态,然后不断重复。当这种重复在心行上稳定之后,就是定。事实上,定并没有那么神秘,稳定地延续下去就是定。当正确的身心行为稳定之后,就会发挥出强大的能量。不然,它的力量是很微弱的。
正念同样需要训练。所以,念佛必须时刻忆念"阿弥陀佛”的名号,将一句名号周而复始地重复、重复、再重复。那么,重复的关键在哪里?就是有正见为指导。否则的话,重复训练会将一些错误的观念和行为固定下来,成为难以改变的不良习惯。
正见能指导我们调整身心,帮助我们作出判断:这个状态应该舍弃,那个状态应该舍弃。通过不断舍弃,将心行调整得不偏不倚。正见还告诉我们:在这一状态中,应以怎样的态度去对待,否则又会落入怎样的状态,等等。这正说明了经教的重要性,因为经教可以帮助我们树立正见。但学习经教必须找到立足点,这个立足点是在我们的心行。所以学法的重点是心,而不是书本。
正确的发心非常重要。凡夫的发心基础是错误的,最终训练出来的就是凡夫心,是贪心、嗔恨;而不是觉悟的心,不是慈心和悲心。反过来说,如果我们能以训练凡夫心的功夫,用于训练佛菩萨品质,训练觉悟的心,也会很快成就的,可能所用的力气还不需要百分之一。关键在于,我们不懂得什么是觉悟的心,更不懂得怎样训练。如果找对方法,觉悟并非遥不可及。翻开古德传记,不少人是经善知识点化,言下顿悟。这也从一个侧面说明,开悟并非不可企及的事。佛陀在世时,很多弟子闻佛说法后,当下得法眼净,证悟圣道圣果。如果很难的话,不可能当下成就。所以修行应该有简单的一面,关键在于找到正确的方法和入手处。
二、学佛人在发心中的误区
普通人因为从凡夫心出发,所以成就了凡夫心。那么学佛者的发心是否就正确呢?其实也不尽然。很多学佛者的发心,并没有摆脱原有的心行习惯,也不属于正确的发心。
> 1.基于某种贪著而发心
学佛者的发心往往存在两种误区。一是从开始就不对,是带着某种贪著学佛。深究起来,可能百分之九十的人都是以此为起点。
有些人是被寺院庄严的环境所感染,走入寺院后觉得非常安详,因此前来学佛,觉得住在寺院享享清福就是人生的至高境界,其实他只是贪著方外之地的氛围。有些人是被清净的梵呗和僧人的念诵打动,学佛后天天跟着唱念,以为这就是最好的修行,其实他只是贪著于梵呗和音声。也有些人喜欢佛教高深的哲理,觉得研究佛学很有思想深度;还有些人欣赏佛教辉煌的艺术,觉得佛教艺术殿堂中有丰富的宝藏,等等。若是缘于对某种外境的贪著而发心学佛,那么在学的过程中,贪著往往也会随之增长。
如果把佛教当作学术来研究,到最后写文章、出成果就成为目的了。一旦有了成果、出了专著、评了职称之后,会觉得学佛的任务已彻底完成,人生的问题已完全解决。还有很多人把佛教当作纯粹的哲学来思考,对哲理的兴趣远远高于解决人生问题,这一类也大有人在。民国年间支那内学院的学者们,基本就落入哲学式的研究,而不是基于对生命的关怀。甚至还有些人是奔着佛教的利益而来,把寺院当作谋生场所,更是错误的发心。
仔细分析起来,绝大部分人都是由类似的因缘走入佛门。真正感悟到人生无常,为寻找生命出路,为了生脱死,为成佛作祖,为利益一切有情而学佛的,实在是少之又少。如果发心后继续缘于对外在现象的贪执,没能在目标上有更高的提升,最后成就的很可能是贪著之心、我法二执。这是发心中的第一种误区现象。
当然,从贪著入门并非绝对不可。《维摩经》曰:"先以欲钩牵,后令入佛智。”也就是说,先以某种方便使人对佛法产生兴趣,然后逐步引导。比如澳洲的一些道场,便免费为大家提供素食。很多人开始到寺院,并不是对佛教有兴趣,而是奔着免费素菜来的。但他们到寺院的次数多了,渐渐对佛教产生感情,然后听听讲座,读读佛教书籍,认识也会有所提高,最终转入正确的发心。所以说,如果不是停留在贪著上,而能通过闻思经教来树立正见,并以正见为指导,"勤修戒定慧,息灭贪嗔痴”。那么,尽管是从贪著开始,最终却能放弃贪著,同样可以成就解脱。
> 2.发心过程中误入凡夫心
第二种误区现象,是从正确的发心开始,的确是为追求解脱或成就佛道而学佛。但这种发心能否持续下去?能否保持永久的纯正性?
我们知道,发心只是开始,只是一念的力量。这个刚刚生起的正念像婴儿一样,力量非常微弱。相反,凡夫心的力量却非常强大,因为它源于无始以来的生命洪流,其力量往往比我们以为的更强大。只有当我们发起强烈的出离心和菩提心时,凡夫心才会暂时退避一下。就像猫出现时,老鼠就知趣地躲进洞里。
但心不会总是处在这样的状态,尤其是当我们做事的时候,比如住持道场、管理寺院,免不了要应酬复杂的人际关系;到各地弘法、开设讲座,也免不了和各种类型的信徒打交道。在这样的过程中,我们往往会忘记当初的发心,甚至将事业的成就当作修行目的。事实上,我们发出离心或菩提心做事,最终所要成就的正果是解脱,是无上菩提,事业只是其中的副产品。
遗憾的是,多数人在做事过程中不知不觉地忽略了初心,背离了最初的目的。尤其在事业有了一定规模之后,我们甚至也会像世俗人那样,希望这项事业越做越大,希望这项事业超过别人,忘了修行人应以怎样的心态来做事。于是乎,所有的凡夫心都回来了。随着事业的发展,对事业的贪著也成正比地增长。事业开展得越大,对事业的贪著之心就越强。虽然从事的是佛教事业,但和从事世俗事业的心行运作规律是一样的。
无论对佛教事业的贪著,还是对世俗财富的贪著,两种贪的本质并没有什么区别。当然,弘扬佛法或护持道场能利益很多人,它所成就的福德,和贪著世间名利的果报截然不同。但我们必须认识到,两者在主观上成就的贪著之心没有丝毫不同。就像在我们的眼中,无论放上金子还是沙子都同样有害。
很多做事的人,包括护法、弘法乃至修行的人,因为在知见上没有过关,不能正确认识做事应有的心态,所以在发心过程中不自觉地落入了凡夫心。这种情况在教界比较普遍,虽然客观上成就了一番佛教事业,但也在主观上成就了典型的凡夫心。事业发展到相当规模之后,甚至形成了山头主义、本位主义、宗派观念。其实,这些都是我执的表现。因为我执也随着事业一起成长,到最后和修行完全是两码事了。表面看起来事业很辉煌,弘法的影响非常大,但我执和贪著之心也在与日俱增。
明白这个道理极其重要,百分之九十五以上的人可能都没注意到这一点,所以接二连三地栽了进去。我也是因为近期思考菩提心的问题,才发现了这个道理。虽然道理很简单,但意义非常重大。尤其是对同学们来说,现在开始把握还来得及。如果我们能发起猛利的菩提心,调整好自身心行,在做事过程中就不会被事业所转。
或许有人会说,既然做事会做出那么多问题来,还不如事不关己,高高挂起。但这样就不能利益一切众生,也不可能成就佛道。我们知道,菩提心的修行是非常积极的。如果不做事,菩提心根本无法调动起来,佛菩萨具备的品质根本无法成就。所以,必须通过修利他行来积累成佛资粮。关键在于,要以正确的发心来做事,并始终保持这份发心。只有这样,我们才能在利益众生的同时,于自身成就佛菩萨一般的品质。
我们应该感到幸运,能在学佛初期就了解到发心的误区。当然,仅仅了解还远远不够。如果不掌握用心要领并付诸实践,即使知道也是白搭,因为凡夫心的力量太大了。所以,我们必须结合佛法中上乘的用心方法,对心行训练下一番苦功,否则,明白了道理也无济于事。
自我诡计多端,它会寻找各种借口来调动凡夫心。我们的内心世界有无数频道,有时我们明明打开的是这个频道,却会被另一个信号更强的频道抢占。我们平时打开电视时也会遇到类似的现象。自我不仅信号强大,而且随时都在伺机而动。在我们的内心深处,每种心所都像心灵的一个频道,有的力量比较弱,有的力量比较强。哪种心所的力量最强,就会当仁不让地主宰我们。其中最危险的是我执,因为它是无始以来形成的。所以修行最大的敌人就是我执,一旦彻底摧毁我执,其他烦恼就迎刃而解了。
如何在发心过程中避免落入凡夫心,是修行非常重要的环节,发心要领亦在其中。仔细分析起来,我们的内心世界十分复杂,即使在行善时,也很难保证是纯粹的利他之心。当然,利他心应该是有的,同时我执也肯定会有,乃至贪心、是非心都很难避免。我们会分别应该利益哪些人,不该利益哪些人等等,其中有很多界限。可见,我们即使在行善时,凡夫心同样会随之启动。若不引起警惕的话,凡夫心往往会逐渐占据主要地位,并最终取代当初的利他心,那我们成就的只能是凡夫心。只有发起纯粹的利他心,才有可能成就佛菩萨的慈悲品质。
《金刚经》和《普贤行愿品》告诉我们,真正的发心应该具备觉悟、利他和无限、无所得的特征。我们必须以此为标准,时时检查并调整自己的心行。首先要认识到发心的误区,才能准确地发起菩提心,进而掌握修行要领。佛法虽然有不同体系,如大乘有唯识、华严、法华、涅槃、中观般若等,但找到其中的核心就会发现,所有经论是在不同层面为我们提供帮助。唯识关于心理的分析,以及心灵运作规律的阐述,对我们认识发心帮助很大。佛法的究竟处是殊途同归的,契入和修证的方法虽然不同,但归结到根本是相通的。
三、如何正确发心
三藏十二部典籍都是围绕心性展开,是在帮助我们解读心性。如果我们不了解自己的心灵,不了解心灵的种种误区,势必无法正确发心。
佛教虽然也关心世界,但关心世界的最终目的,还是为了解决心性问题。因为我们的许多烦恼,都是因为对世界的错误认识而引起。世界和我们的心,究竟是一还是二?在一般人的眼中,心是心,世界是世界,二者似乎没有太大关系。因为我们认为心与世界为二,从而使心落入二元对立的执著中。
修行中有两个最大的敌人,即能执和所执。关于能所二执,唯识宗为我们阐述得非常清楚:遍计所执是生命从无限落入有限的开始,当我们超越遍计所执时,就能从缘起现象的当下契入空性。真理的世界因为这种执著,就成了凡夫的世界。如果我们认识到"一切唯心造”的道理,就可以从这样的认知中契入空性。因为一切现象都是心的显现,和心是一体的。这是学习唯识必须了解的基本理念。
古往今来,各种宗教层出不穷,佛陀在世时就有九十六种外道。为什么其他宗教不能开大智慧、契入空性呢?原因就在于认识上的错误,因为他们把不是真理、不是空性的东西当作诸法的真实相,是不同程度地停留在我法二执中,执著于某一种我,或某一种法,所见到的并不是事物本来面目。
对心性的正确认识,于修行来说至关重要。只有了解到这一层面,我们才能明确知道发心应该从哪里开始。正确的发心主要有两种,即出离心、菩提心。
> 1.出离心
什么是出离心?很多人发心出家时,迫切地想从家中离开,迫切到一天都等不及了,那一刻的心态就是出离心。世间的家庭离异,双方迫不及待地想要分手,一心盼着越快解决越好;再或者,我们在某地呆得厌倦了,不想再看一眼,多呆一天都是折磨,那种迫切希望分手或离开的心,也是出离心。至于出到哪里,当然是另一回事,这里只是说明希求出离的心态。
我们不妨反省一下,自己学佛、出家、追求解脱,是否时刻保持着这份出离心?很多人刚出家时可能会有,但时间长了,出家逐渐演变为另一种生活方式,不过是换个地方过日子。这并不奇怪,从心理学上说,人有一种习惯性的麻木。对于某种状态熟悉了,就会逐渐失去感觉。
我们平常看到死人,尤其是身边的亲人去世,马上会提起对死亡的警觉。但那些殡仪馆的工作人员,把尸体扔到电炉里,可能和烧老虎灶差不多。这种事一般人多半不敢做,把一个曾经活生生的人推进去化成灰烬,的确是很难下手的事。但他们每天都要面对那么多冰冷僵硬的尸体,对死亡不再有任何恐惧和警觉。再比如,每个病人都对自己的病情看得很重,但医生每天要治疗一批批病人,病人认为再重要的病,在医生眼中也不过是千万患者中的一例,不会引起和病人同样的重视。这些都属于习惯性麻木。
出家对很多人来说也是一样。出家时间长了,很容易把寺院当作过日子的环境,只想着营造一个把日子过好的氛围。所以佛陀告诫比丘们,要时常忆念生命在呼吸间,一息不来就是来生。这样才会对死亡保持警觉,不再贪恋安逸的生活。
如果我们真正意识到无常是那么迫切,意识到无常就在眼前,还敢散乱、妄想、追名逐利吗?还有时间去忙这些身外事吗?我们就会自觉地"如救头燃”般精进,保持对修行的紧迫感,不敢有丝毫松懈。如果我们的心时时处于一级戒备状态,修行就很容易相应。
发起出离心,是出家修行的基础。那么,究竟是要出离什么呢?就是对生死的出离,对世间的出离,对五欲六尘的出离。真正的出离包括两个方面:一是外在的出离,一是内在的出离。外在的就是五欲六尘,内在的就是对五欲六尘的贪著及由贪著引起的凡夫心。所以我们要出离的不仅是环境,更是自身的凡夫心。事实上,出离环境的目的,正是为了出离对环境的贪著及由此引起的凡夫心。我们只有摆脱凡夫心,才能契入空性,解脱烦恼。
出离凡夫心,首先不能对世间有丝毫贪著,这是关键所在。阿含教法告诉我们,在认识上应以观苦为第一要领。苦是佛教出世解脱的基础,观人生是苦,进而认识无常、空、无我,是发起出离心的几个基本认知。
而在行为上,则应依戒、定、慧修行。我们无始以来养成了贪嗔痴等种种串习,每种烦恼串习都在设法主宰我们。我们必须通过戒的力量阻止它,不让烦恼有可乘之机。所谓定,即通过某个所缘将心安住其上,比如修数息观、不净观,将心安住于数息或观想不净,使妄想不再活动。然后再修习无常观、无我观,引发无漏智慧,将烦恼、执著彻底铲除。
所以说,发起出离心之后必须懂得怎么保持,并使它的力量不断壮大,直至最终成就。否则的话,即使发起出离心,不久也会被凡夫心取而代之。当我们发起猛利的出离心时,凡夫心会暂时避一避。但只要我们稍稍松懈,它立刻会卷土重来。我深深体会到,修行必须像勇士般精进,否则很难有重大突破。当然,用心上的勇猛并不是非常强烈的作意。虽然开始时需要作意,但更主要的是指不松懈。如果长时间地过分用力,不但容易疲倦,还会落入作意的误区中。所以关键是懂得怎么用心,否则用错了力,勇猛精进也会出问题的,所谓欲速则不达。
发起出离心的最终目标是解脱生死。在现代社会,修行确实比过去困难,因为整个社会的诱惑太多,出家人的事务也太多。对于多数人来说,开始修行时很容易受到环境的影响,所以对环境的要求非常严格。过去的出家人多半隐逸于山林,过着纯粹的修行生活,除了需要极少一点资养色身的衣食外,主要精力都用于证道。相比之下,我们今天的修行环境很严峻,修习解脱道的难度要大得多。
所以,今天的修行可能要采用一些比较猛利的方法。换句话说,就是时间短、见效快,立马就能截断众流。在佛法修行中,确实有这样的方法,可以让我们在较短时间内上路。而且在上路之后,立刻使我们保持在无念、无住、无所得的状态中。在今天,我们有必要寻找这些用心的方便,修行才更有把握。如果像古人那样,必须坐上十年、二十年才有些起色,现代人是很难修起来的。因为没有单纯的氛围,我们在修行中取得的一点点进步,往往还抵不上外境造成的伤害。
尽管不少人每天会拿出两小时或更多时间来念佛、诵经、禅修,但其余十几个小时往往还是在念贪嗔痴。我们用作意培养起来的正念还非常弱,根本抵挡不住无始以来的串习。这就是很多人虽然也在修行,但烦恼习气依然如故的原因。
如果修行是建立在凡夫心的层面,出现这些现象再正常不过。因为我们现在培养起来的正念是建立在意识层面的,想以此抵挡无始以来的烦恼妄念,力量如此悬殊,怎么可能取胜呢?就像婴儿和壮汉搏斗一般,结果是不言而喻的。认识到这个心行规律,我们就很容易理解,为什么很多人的修行无法达到预期效果。
> 2.菩提心
出离心只是修行的基础,进而还要发起菩提心。出离心的发展有两种情况:一是强烈的个人出离,只追求涅槃解脱,属于趣寂声闻;一是从出离心开始,然后回小向大,发起菩提心。出离心是对世间贪著的出离,正是菩提心建立的基础。而菩提心具有的无住、无所得的特征,与出离心是相应的。两者的区别在于能否推己及人,由个人解脱而发愿利益众生,共证菩提。
菩提心具备两个内涵:一是广泛利益众生,一是追求无上佛果。两者是否存在先后顺序?在发心过程中,我们究竟以利益众生为先,还是以成佛为先?是为了成佛才去度众生,还是为了度众生才成佛呢?在这个问题上有一些不同的观点。
对大多数学佛者来说,可能首先想到的是"我要成佛”,然后为了成就佛果去利益众生。也就是说,度众生是为了"我”的成佛。但菩萨在利益众生的过程中,不应将自己视为众生的恩人,而要将众生视为自己的恩人。这是因为,唯有利他才能使我们成就慈悲品质和菩提资粮。《普贤行愿品》告诉我们:"一切众生而为树根,诸佛菩萨而为华果,以大悲水饶益众生,则能成就诸佛菩萨智慧华果。”明确指出了佛菩萨和众生的关系,以众生作为成就慈悲的增上缘。
即使我们具备佛菩萨一样的生命品质,这颗种子也要通过利益众生才能成熟,而且是纯粹的利他。只有发心达到这个份上,才能圆满内在的慈悲品质。如果其中还夹杂着凡夫心,只能成为调动慈悲的前奏,甚至可能"差之毫厘,失之千里”。同时,我们还必须将发心积累到一定的量,才能使菩提心完全启动。这个训练可能要通过百次、千次、万次,乃至千万次的重复。我们要每天这么想、这么做,通过不断的心灵模拟和训练来强化它。一旦发心的质和量都具足了,我们就和佛菩萨无二无别了。
但如果我们始终本着这样一种心态,只是将度众生作为成佛的方便,慈悲心是很难圆满的。因为我们的目标在于"我要成佛”,有这个"我”在,很难保证在度化众生时是纯粹的利他心,甚而还会有利用众生之嫌。
所以我觉得这种观点有利有弊。有利的方面在于,当我们度化众生时,可以明确知道自己为什么要利益众生:因为"我要成佛”就必须利他。而弊端则在于,未能真正对众生生起"无缘大慈、同体大悲”,只是像生病必须吃药一样,将利他当作成佛的途径和手段。如果停留在这种心态,慈悲心的纯度肯定会受到不同程度的影响。
另一种观点则是"为利有情愿成佛”,也就是说,修行不是以成佛为目的,只是为了更好地度化众生。就像同学们来到研究所进修,目的不是为了取得一个文凭,而是为了将来更好地弘法利生,荷担如来家务。如果我们一切都是为了众生,丝毫没有夹杂其他成分,更容易达到佛菩萨的发心标准。当我们这样发心时,佛菩萨品质已在生命中产生作用,当下就在某个层面和佛菩萨无二无别。这就是《华严经》所说的"初发心即成正觉”,换句话说,修行初始和最终结果在本质上并没有区别。
在《华严经·初发心功德品》中,对于菩萨的初发心功德有详细阐述。由此我们可以了解到,发心发到位时,功德之大简直超乎想象。这是因为------菩提心就是成佛之心!
那么,如何发起菩提心?或许有人会觉得很抽象,事实上,它有很多具体的操作方法。发菩提心的内涵是什么?就是我要度众生、我要成佛。这种"我要成佛”的心理,其实和"我要吃饭”是一样的,只是所缘对象不同。当然,其中还有程度和纯度的差别。比如"我要吃饭”,有可吃可不吃、很想吃和非吃不可之分。在某种意义上说,"我要成佛”的意愿也与此相似。
问题在于,我们想吃饭时会很着急,想成佛时却没有那么迫切。因为日常生活中的发心和"我要成佛”的发心,毕竟还有区别。我们想吃饭的话,马上就可以吃。但想要成佛的话,怎么才能成就呢?似乎无从入手。为什么会出现这样的情况?是因为我们不能真正认识到成佛的意义。所以,我们发心时还要有一个所缘境,也就是佛果功德。《华严经》等经论中,有大量经文说明佛果的功德。只有当我们认识到佛果功德的殊胜,认识到人生的意义在于成就佛果,才有可能发起强烈的菩提心。
在我看来,整个大乘经典阐述的修行方式,从菩萨的愿力到菩萨戒,及大乘华严、般若的见地,所有这一切都是围绕菩提心的成就而展开。只有通过发菩提愿、持菩萨戒、行菩萨道,才能使菩提心发芽、开花并最终结果。所以说,菩提心既是修行的着力点,也是最终所要成就的结果。如果不发菩提心,我们的修行就无法找到立足点。
四、菩提心的殊胜
我们已经了解到,学佛的正确发心是发菩提心。但在佛教界,不少人仅仅将发心作为口号,却不曾付诸行动。原因何在?我想,应该是对菩提心的重要性缺乏认识。
就我个人而言,过去对菩提心的认识也很肤浅。虽然时常会提到发心,可也和很多人一样,并没有真正落实到行动中。自从接触《华严经·初发心功德品》后,深为菩提心的力量所震撼。回顾多年所学,并进一步翻阅大乘经论,才真切意识到发菩提心的意义所在。
> 1.菩提心的殊胜
和许多大乘经典一样,《初发心功德品》亦以校量的方式来阐述发心功德。经中运用了十一个比喻,分别为:利乐众生喻、速疾步刹喻、知劫成坏喻、善知胜解喻、善知诸根喻、善知欲乐喻、善知方便喻、善知他心喻、善知业相喻、善知烦恼喻、供佛及生喻。
本品主讲者为法慧菩萨,当机者为天帝释。经文开篇,天帝释即向法慧菩萨询问:菩萨初发心功德究竟多大?法慧菩萨首先以利乐众生喻说明,经文大意为:假使有人以一切乐具(能为众生带来利益安乐的物质资生用品),供养十方世界中多达十阿僧祇的众生,历经百劫;然后教化他们修习十善道,以此法供养历经千劫;然后教化他们修习四禅,长达百千劫;然后教导他们修习四无量心,长达亿劫;然后指导他们修习四无色定,长达百亿劫;然后指导他们依解脱道修行,令得须陀洹果,长达千亿劫;然后又指导他们修行,令得斯陀含果,长达百千亿劫;然后指导他们安住阿那含果的修行,长达那由他亿劫;然后指导他们阿罗汉果位的修行,长达百千那由他亿劫;然后又教化他们成就辟支佛道的修行。
法慧菩萨以一系列比喻说明后,反问天帝释:佛子!你看此人功德有多大?天帝释答言:此人功德实非凡人可以想象,唯有佛陀才能知晓。
法慧菩萨接着说:此人功德虽不可思议,但比之于菩萨初发心功德,却不及百分之一、千分之一、百千分之一乃至优波尼沙陀分之一。换言之,菩萨初发心功德超过以上功德的百倍、千倍、百千倍、优波尼沙陀倍。优波尼沙陀是梵语的数量单位,为最大的数量词。
接着,法慧菩萨又连续演说十个比喻,层层递进,以此校量菩萨初发心的功德。在这十个比喻中,后后功德胜于前前。故每一喻皆以"且置此喻”作为开端,舍置前前,更举后后,以此标举菩萨初发心功德之殊胜难思,至高无上。
了解到初发心的殊胜功德,我们在心向往之的同时,或许会产生一丝疑惑:菩萨初发心为何具有如此功德?究竟与凡夫、二乘人的发心有何不同?针对这一疑问,法慧菩萨进一步作出说明:天帝释!一切诸佛初发心时,不仅以一切资生用具供养十方世界中一切众生;也不仅教化众生修习五戒、十善,修习四禅、四无量心、四无色定,并帮助他们获得须陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿罗汉果、辟支佛道。初发心菩萨并不以此为满足,更在此基础上,发心令如来种性不断并传播到所有世界,发心度化一切众生成就佛道。
从中我们可以看出,菩萨初发心与凡夫、二乘人发心的根本区别,在于前者是以无限之心行广大善行,而后者却是有限的。此处所说的有限包含两个方面:一是数量有限,尽管"十方十阿僧祇”这个数字已大得难以想象,但毕竟还是有限的;二是成就有限,无论以资生用具令众生获得安乐,还是指导他们成就声闻四果乃至辟支佛道,皆是有限有上的果位,非为无限无上的佛果。
从有限的发心出发,度化有限的众生,成就有限的果位,最终成就的功德必然是有限的。再多的有限相加,不过是更多、更大的有限,绝不能和无限相比。而菩萨初之发心,是以无限的众生为利益对象,以无上的佛果为成就目标。
或许有人会感到不解:众生如微尘般数不胜数,诸佛菩萨可能度尽吗?久远劫来,已有无量诸佛成就佛道,若诸佛皆须度化一切众生后方证菩提,为何还有无数众生沉溺于生死轮回之中?众生并未度尽,而诸佛已然成就,此又作何理解?
我们要知道,菩萨发心度化一切众生成就佛道,并不意味着要等众生全体成佛之后,功德才能圆满。若是如此,恐怕无人能成就佛道。因为众生是无限的,而佛菩萨之出世度众生,还需因缘具足。唯有众生自身的善根福德因缘成就了,佛菩萨才有能力度化他,否则也是枉然。
如果菩萨发心度脱一切众生,并在修行中逐渐成就这一发心,那么,当他能对一切众生生起无限、平等的慈悲时,也就圆满了诸佛具有的心行和品质,当下便与佛无二无别了。反之,若在其心目中还有一个众生被厌弃,菩萨就不能圆成无上佛果,因为他的慈悲心还不彻底。
在教界广为流传的《普贤行愿品》,正是普贤菩萨为我们成就诸佛无量功德所提供的修行捷径。其核心内容为普贤十大愿王:一者礼敬诸佛,二者称赞如来,三者广修供养,四者忏悔业障,五者随喜功德,六者请转法轮,七者请佛住世,八者常随佛学,九者恒顺众生,十者普皆回向。以上内容似乎也很平常,多数佛教徒都不会感到陌生,却历来被尊为"愿王”,原因何在?
《行愿品》出自《华严经》,其修行立足于华严境界之上。这一点,主要表现在每一愿的开端和总结。如"礼敬诸佛”,其始为"所有尽法界、虚空界,十方三世一切佛刹极微尘数诸佛世尊,我以普贤行愿力故,深心信解,如对目前”,其终为"虚空界尽,我礼乃尽;以虚空界不可尽故,我此礼敬无有穷尽。如是乃至众生界尽,众生业尽,众生烦恼尽,我礼乃尽;而众生界乃至烦恼无有尽故,我此礼敬无有穷尽。念念相续,无有间断;身语意业,无有疲厌”。
"礼敬诸佛”,似乎多数学佛者都会。但一般人从狭隘的凡夫心出发,礼敬的内涵亦很狭隘。而在普贤菩萨的广大行愿中,是以尽法界、虚空界、十方三世一切诸佛作为礼敬对象,并且不是礼敬一天、一年乃至一生,而是尽未来际永不间断。纵使海枯石烂,虚空界尽,亦恒常依普贤行愿修持礼敬法门。
其余九愿的境界,皆亦如是。从中我们可以了解到,普贤行愿之所以被尊为愿王,关键就在于它立足于无限,以无限之心行无限善行。礼敬诸佛是以一切诸佛为所缘,度化众生同样是以一切众生为所缘,并且都是尽未来际。在对象上是无限的,没有任何一个众生被排除在外;在时间上也是无限的,既没有停息之时,也没有结束之日。
依《华严》的见地发心、修行,是以无限为起点,而"无限”二字,正是菩萨初发心功德不可思议的关键所在。依有限的发心,即使做再多的利生事业,成就终归是有限的。若欲成就佛果的无量功德,必须建立于无限的发心之上。我们知道,任何数字乘以无穷大之后,结果必然是无穷大。同样的道理,以无限之心修持善行,所行虽然有限,所获乃是无限。所以,若初发心菩萨以无限之心行利生事业,便能于念念中成就无限功德,圆成佛道资粮。
> 2.菩提心是入大乘门
如何区分大乘与小乘?很多人都以为,修学大乘经典便是大乘行者,修学小乘经典便是小乘行者,却极少从自身的发心来考量。汉传佛教为大乘,因而,中国佛教徒多以大乘行者自居,似乎这一身份是理所当然的。
何为大乘?宗喀巴大师在《道次第》中说:"佛说有波罗蜜多乘及密乘二种,除彼更无余大乘矣。然此二由何门而入耶?唯菩提心是。此于身心何时生起,虽其他之任何功德未生,是亦住入大乘。”这里,以菩提心作为衡量是否大乘的标准。唯有发起菩提心,方为大乘行者。反之,即使证得空性,成就种种功德,也只是自度的声闻行者。
菩提心和空性慧为佛法修行的两大内涵,如鸟之双翼,缺一不可。《道次第》云:"如是无上菩提心者,是佛苗因中如种子之不共因,通达空性之慧者,如水粪等,是三种菩提之共因也。”明确告诉我们:空性慧乃成佛之共因,菩提心则为成佛之不共因。所谓共因者,即三乘圣者皆依空性慧而成就,为三乘修行之母。所谓不共因,是因为三乘之中,唯有菩萨道修行才必须具备菩提心。换言之,发起菩提心之后才是真正的佛子,是合格的大乘行者。
但在汉传佛教的传统中,似乎更重视空性慧。教下行者通过数十年的修学,主要是为了获得正见,并依此修习止观,证悟空性。宗下更重视见性,以此作为根本目标,似乎见性便可囊括修行的一切。或许是因为对空性慧的特别偏重,所以,虽有不少大乘经教都强调六度四摄的菩萨行,但并未引起四众弟子的普遍重视,将之落实于真修实履的更不多见。
菩萨行是菩提心的具体实践。事实上,因为忽略了大乘佛教建立的基础------菩提心,相当一部分人的行持早已落入小乘乃至人天乘。既没有慈悲众生的济世情怀,更没有舍我其谁的担当精神。他们也许从未思考过:作为一个大乘行者,究竟应当成就怎样的品质?这一流弊,使得很多人的修行更接近于超然出世的解脱道,而非积极利生的菩萨道。
五、菩提心的种类
菩提心是成就佛道之心,是利益一切众生之心。佛果的无上菩提,正是菩提心的圆满成就。关于菩提心的种类差别,大乘经论中有不同的归纳。
《入菩萨行论》中,分为愿菩提心和行菩提心。论云:"略摄菩提心,当知有二种:愿求菩提心,趣行菩提心。如人尽了知,欲行正行别,如是智者知,二心次第别。”
在《显扬圣教论》和《瑜伽师地论》中,分为世俗发心和证法性发心(胜义菩提心)。《显扬圣教论》云:"此受发心复有二种:一、世俗发心,二、证法性发心。”
《瑜伽师地论·摄抉择分》则开为十种,其中,主要有世俗菩提心和胜义菩提心之分:"谓世俗受发心,得法性发心;不决定发心,决定发心;不清净发心,清净发心;劣发心,强盛发心;未成果发心,已成果发心。世俗受发心者,谓诸菩萨未入菩萨正性离生所有发心。得法性发心者,谓诸菩萨已入菩萨正性离生。”
综合起来,大致可归纳为愿菩提心、行菩提心和胜义菩提心。
> 1.愿菩提心
所谓愿菩提心,是关于菩提心的愿力。学佛首先要发愿,也就是通常所说的立志。"志当存高远”,志向越高,成就也就越大。发菩提心不是空洞的口号,怎样才能体现我们的菩提心?最基本的表现方式就是发愿。
《瑜伽师地论·菩萨地·发心品》说:"菩萨最初发心于诸菩萨所有正愿,是初正愿普能摄受其余正愿,是故发心以初正愿为其自性。又诸菩萨起正愿心求菩提时,发如是心,说如是言:愿我决定当证无上正等菩提,能作有情一切义利,毕竟安处究竟涅槃,及以如来广大智中。如是发心定自希求无上菩提,及求能作有情义利,是故发心以定希求为其行相。又诸菩萨缘大菩提,及缘有情一切义利,发心希求,非无所缘,是故发心以大菩提及诸有情一切义利为所缘境。”
这段经文包括了发心的自性、行相、所缘。自性指菩萨最初发起的正愿,即"愿我决定当证无上正等菩提,能作有情一切义利,毕竟安处究竟涅槃”。这是以希求无上菩提及利益一切众生的愿力,为菩提心的自体。愿菩提心代表菩萨修行的开始,也是修习菩提心的初级阶段。
愿菩提心是一种愿望,其心行特征,是以希求为行相,以利益一切有情及无上菩提为所缘。希求是极为普通的心行,我们每天都生活在种种希求中:希求可口的饭菜,希求豪华的住宅,希求舒适的环境等等,然后会为了满足种种希求而努力奋斗。佛法修行也是从希求开始,所不同的是,我们现在希求的不是金钱地位、衣服饮食,而是无上菩提及利益一切众生。区别只是在于希求内容,是由希望个人得益转而希望利益大众。这种不同的希求,决定了截然相反的两种人生方向------一是解脱成佛,一是继续轮回。因为菩提心是以无上菩提及利益一切众生为所缘,当我们缘这两点希求付诸行动时,便踏上了成佛之道。
所以,发心之后的首要问题便是发愿,将菩提心转化为精进不退的愿力。十方三世诸佛的成就,正是我们修行的最佳榜样:阿弥陀佛在因地名法藏比丘,因亲近世自在王佛听闻佛法而发无上菩提之心,希望成就庄严的佛国净土,以此利益众生。乃向世自在王佛请教。世自在王佛为法藏比丘演示二百一十亿诸佛刹土,使其了解这些国土中天人之善恶,国土之粗妙。法藏比丘观看之后,以五劫思维,方形成极乐世界的蓝图及四十八愿的构想。于是,法藏比丘于世自在王佛前发四十八大愿,由此而有西方极乐世界及阿弥陀佛的成就。
菩萨道修行有大悲、大智、大愿、大行四大内涵,代表人物分别是大悲观音菩萨、大智文殊菩萨、大愿地藏菩萨和大行普贤菩萨。《地藏菩萨本愿经》记载:"地藏菩萨摩诃萨于过去久远不可说不可说劫前,身为大长者子。时世有佛号曰师子奋迅具足万行如来,时长者子见佛相好,千福庄严,因问彼佛:作何行愿而得此相?时师子奋迅具足万行如来告长者子:欲证此身,当须久远度脱一切受苦众生。文殊师利,时长者子因发愿言:我今尽未来际不可计劫,为是罪苦六道众生广设方便,尽令解脱,而我自身方成佛道。”恶道众生无量无边、难以穷尽,地藏菩萨却毫无畏惧,勇于担当,甘愿将他们度尽之后方证菩提。这是何等令人震撼、令人感佩的愿力。因地藏菩萨于师子奋迅如来前发如此大愿,历经百千万亿那由他劫,仍以菩萨的身份出现,广度众生。
此外,我们熟悉的东方药师琉璃光如来、观音菩萨、文殊菩萨、普贤菩萨,皆于因地发起广大誓愿。这些愿力有着共同的特点,那就是利益一切众生。对于凡夫来说,总是为个人利益奔忙:我要成就什么,我要得到什么。但佛菩萨的愿力是以利他为核心,每一愿皆从利益众生出发。不论阿弥陀佛的四十八愿,还是药师如来的十二大愿,普贤菩萨的十大愿王,无一例外。
我们经常念诵的四弘誓愿,则是对菩萨愿力的高度概括,可以说是菩萨行者的通愿。"众生无边誓愿度,烦恼无尽誓愿断,法门无量誓愿学,佛道无上誓愿成。”对于无量无边的众生,我们要发愿救度;对于无始以来的烦恼,我们要决心断除;对于诸佛开显的法门,我们要精进修学;对于至高无上的佛果,我们要努力成就。所有这些愿望,都属于愿菩提心。这是何等广大的悲心和宏愿。
或许有人会觉得,那是诸佛菩萨的境界,我等凡夫如何能望其项背?我们要知道,诸佛初发心时亦未成就,也和我们一样身为凡夫。他们发愿之后,也并未立即成为佛菩萨,而是历经长劫修行,难行能行,方圆证菩提。他们若不曾迈出最初一步,如何能成就无上菩提?如果我们迟迟不迈出这一步,也将永远停留于凡夫的身份。
学佛,归根到底是学佛所行。诸佛菩萨的修行始于发愿,我们亦当如是效仿,将希求无上菩提和利益众生作为人生目标。能否真切地生起这种殊胜希求,取决于我们的认识程度。倘若我们对此只有泛泛的认识,自然无法发起恳切殷重之心。唯有深深意识到这是生命的唯一出路,才能生起强烈的希求。
但发愿仅仅是修行的开始,如果发起后不再忆念它、巩固它,这一念心可能很快就会淡化甚至消失。因为发愿只是在生命中播下一颗菩提种子。与无尽生死中形成的凡夫心相比,它的力量实在微不足道。如何令这颗种子的力量壮大?大乘经论中关于菩提心的修法值得我们借鉴。
发菩提心,是修行的头等大事。因此,发心后应以庄严的受持仪轨和誓言,将这份愿心确定下来。行者在阿阇黎耶前右膝著地,合掌而发其心念云:"阿阇黎耶存念,我某甲于此生及余生,施性、戒性、修性,所有善根,自作教作,见作随喜。以彼善根,如昔诸如来、应、正等觉及住大地诸大菩萨,于其无上正等菩提如何发心,我某甲亦从今时乃至菩提,于其中间,于无上正等广大菩提而为发心。诸未度有情为令得度,诸未解脱为令解脱,诸未出苦为令出苦,诸未遍入涅槃为令遍入涅槃。”如是三说。
受持菩提心之后,为令已发愿心恒不退转,应昼夜各念诵"诸佛正法贤圣僧,直至菩提永皈依,我以所修诸善根,为利有情愿成佛”三次,每次三遍。通过受持和念诵的反复熏习,菩提心将在生命中熏下坚固的种子。受持者越虔诚,受持气氛越庄严,所熏种子的力量就会越强大。心行是需要因缘滋润的,时刻执我,会使我执念念增长。同样的道理,不断忆念菩提心的殊胜,就是不断为我们播下的种子浇水,会使愿心的力量与日俱增。
我们必须明确,发菩提心的行相是希求,所缘是无上菩提及利益一切众生。若以财色名食睡为希求、为所缘时,便落入了凡夫心;若我们只想利益少数众生或自己的亲人时,也与菩提心差之甚远了。所以我们应时时告诫自己,以希求无上菩提和利益一切众生为人生唯一目标。
> 2.行菩提心
所谓行菩提心,是将誓愿转化为行为。当我们有了利他的愿望,需要将此落实到行为上。整个菩萨道修行都属于行菩提心的范畴,内容主要是六度四摄。六度为布施、持戒、忍辱、精进、禅定、般若。经论中亦有十度之说,即在六度之外加上方便度、愿度、力度、智度。四摄为布施、爱语、利行、同事。
从名称看,菩萨行似乎并没有多少奇特之处。从人天乘到解脱道的修行中,都有这些内容。那么菩萨道的六度四摄,其不共之处又在哪里呢?关于这个问题,《辩中边论·无上乘品》提出了十二种最胜,以显示大乘行者所修六度的殊胜。
十二种最胜的内容是:菩萨修习六度,终不欣乐一切世间荣华富贵,志向广大(广大最胜);以无数劫的时间修习(长时最胜);普为利乐一切有情(依处最胜);回向无上正等菩提(无尽最胜);认识到自他平等(无间最胜);于一切有情所修善法深生随喜(无难最胜);以虚空藏等三摩地为依(自在最胜);无分别智之所摄受(摄受最胜);在胜解行地上品忍中发起(发起最胜);在极喜地中成就胜义菩提心,发起无漏行(至得最胜);第八地(等流最胜)乃至佛地(究竟最胜)。
关于菩萨道修行,在唯识宗的本论《瑜伽师地论·菩萨地》中,通过施品、戒品、忍品、精进品、静虑品、慧品、摄事品,对六度四摄的修行差别作了广泛而细致的阐述。其中的"戒品”,即大家所熟悉的"瑜伽菩萨戒”,由玄奘三藏单独译出,在佛教界广泛流传。
瑜伽菩萨戒的内容,包括摄律仪戒、摄善法戒、饶益有情戒三部分。摄律仪戒,是菩萨所受的七众别解脱律仪,偏向于止恶,止一切恶,无恶不止。摄善法戒,谓身口意所作善法及闻思修三慧,着重于修善,修一切善,无善不修。饶益有情戒,指菩萨修习的一切利他行,如慈悲喜舍四无量心等。
瑜伽菩萨戒的完整内容为四重四十三轻,是根据六度四摄,以及利他中容易产生的障碍制定规则,保证利他行的稳定性和持续性。也就是说,不仅将止恶作为准则,也将行善以戒律条文固定下来,让行者知道"我必须为利益众生做些什么,又该怎样去做”。否则的话,凡夫心会有种种懈怠的借口。尤其在利他和个人利益暂时出现冲突时,我执会本能地对利他产生抗拒,这就需要一些强制性的规则,使自己无法回避。
其中,依障布施度建立的有七条,依障持戒度建立的有七条,依障忍辱度建立的有四条,依障精进度建立的有三条,依障静虑度建立的有三条,依障慧度建立的有八条,依障四摄建立的有十一条。如果说六度比较偏向自利的圆满,那么四摄更偏向利他的修行------以布施饶益有情,以爱语开导其心,以利行帮助他人,以同事感化众生。相对自利来说,利他还特别需要注意与人交往的善巧,必须以对方乐于接受的方式给予帮助,否则就不能达到预期效果,甚至会适得其反,使对方产生抵触情绪。我们若依此检验自己的心态和行为,就能将菩萨行落实在日常生活中,而不仅仅停留在口号上。
特别要注意的是,六度修行中,般若度是根本所在,所谓"五度如盲,般若如导”。如果不依般若慧断除凡夫心,所修布施、持戒、忍辱、精进、禅定很可能是世间善行,最终成就的,也只是人天小果,有漏之因。唯有在般若的指导下,布施等善行才能成为佛道资粮。因此,在修习六度的过程中,空性正见是不可或缺的。
般若与方便,为菩萨道的重要组成部分。正如《略论》所说:"方便与慧,随学一分,不能成佛。”《大日经》亦云:"彼一切种智,是从大悲之根本生,是从菩提心之因生,是以方便而到究竟。”佛果具有悲和智两种品质。佛陀成就的大慈大悲,是以菩提心为因,通过布施等利他方便而成就。如果不发菩提心,即使像声闻行者那样成就空性慧,也只能使个人解脱,不能圆满无上菩提。
行菩提心的修习,是建立在愿菩提心的基础上。依愿心而有菩萨行,并通过六度四摄使愿心得到增长。我们最初发起的菩提心,只是世俗菩提心,力量还很微弱。如果这颗菩提种子不能得到呵护和养育,或许很快干枯。唯有全心全意地照料它,及时补充养分,为它创造良好的成长空间,种子才能成长为参天大树。所以我们发菩提心之后,还要受持菩萨戒。这些广大的菩萨行,正是菩提心的最佳养料。
除了瑜伽菩萨戒,在中国的弘扬主要还有梵网菩萨戒,出自《梵网经·菩萨心地戒品》,戒相有十重四十八轻。这两种是通出家和在家的。此外还有出自《优婆塞戒经·受戒品》的在家菩萨戒,戒相有六重二十八轻。
> 3.胜义菩提心
虽然我们发愿利益众生并付诸行动,但对凡夫来说,这些愿行仍是不究竟的。因为它们是建立在世俗心的基础上,是有漏而有限的,也是充满不平等的,故称世俗菩提心。如何将有限的愿心转化为无限的慈悲?需要以空性慧提纯并拓展,将发心过程中掺入的杂质逐步剔除。唯有通达空性,我们才能真正体悟到自己和众生本是一体,才能对众生生起佛菩萨那样的无缘大慈、同体大悲。所以,胜义菩提心须证悟空性后才能发起,换言之,是初地菩萨才能做到的。
六、菩提心的发起因缘
如何才能发起菩提心?菩提心之根本为利他。但这个"他”,并非我们心目中特定的"他”,亦非我们喜爱的亲人朋友,而是一切众生。利益一切众生,绝非易事。若是关起门来,在内心想象着利益一切众生,相对还比较容易。因为其中没有具体的众生,不会涉及那些我们讨厌的人。但现实中的众生形形色色,其中可能有相当一部分是我们不喜欢乃至痛恨的,是平时避之尤恐不及的。但佛法告诉我们,应该对一切有情生起平等心,即使是我们的冤家仇人,即使他们曾经一而再、再而三地损恼我们,都要毫无芥蒂地平等相待。不仅如此,还要进一步对他们生起感恩之心,感恩他们成就我们的修行。对于大多数人来说,的确困难重重。
几乎每个人都有自己特别关爱和在乎的人,比如父母眼中的孩子,青年眼中的恋人。为什么不能将这份关爱和在乎遍及一切众生?根源就在于我们的心。在我们现有的境界中,尚未具备关爱一切众生的心。在我们心灵中产生主导作用的,通常都是情绪,而情绪又充满好恶和不平等。在这样一种心态下,可能做到冤亲平等吗?可能对众生一视同仁吗?即使表面能做一点,往往也非常勉强。
以平等觉悟之心利他,对心行的要求极高。但佛菩萨的品质正是这样培养的,没有第二条路可以选择。面对这样的困难和内心冲突,首先可以通过观想,以相应的方便善巧来克服局限,启动内心平等利他等正面力量。在我们的生命内在,本来具足佛菩萨一样的心,具足佛菩萨一样的无限大悲,关键是唤醒这种沉睡已久的心行,使之发挥作用。
菩提心也是缘起的,正如省庵大师在《劝发菩提心文》中所说:"此菩提心为诸善中王,必有因缘乃得发起。”菩提心乃一切善法中境界最高、能量最大的心行,其成就也最为圆满。但这种善法并非凭空而有,同样依赖于各种因缘的和合。关于菩提心的发起,通常有以下几种途径。
> 1.七因果
《修心七要》中,阿底峡尊者为我们讲述了七因果的修法,从知母、念恩、报恩、修慈、修悲、增上意乐进入菩提心。其中,知母、念恩、报恩是菩提心发起的前奏,而修慈、修悲属于菩提心的内涵。
所谓知母,是将一切众生视为自己的生身母亲。众生无始以来都曾是我们的骨肉至亲,或为父母尊长,或为兄弟姐妹。正如《梵网经》所说:"一切男子是我父,一切女人是我母。”此外,很多佛教经典都曾论及这种关系。但对现代人来说,"知母”能否使人生起报恩心很值得怀疑。相当一部分人,对今生的母亲都不愿孝顺奉事,更何况过去的父母?也许有人觉得,把一切众生当作儿女,效果也许会更好,因为绝大多数人对儿女都关怀备至,疼爱有加。佛经中也有类似的教导,言菩萨应将一切众生当作独生子般看待。但此处为何强调"知母”呢?因为后面还涉及"念恩”"报恩”。人们对儿女的喜爱是本能的,是出于天性,但我们不可能对一切众生同样生起天性的喜爱,所以还是要"知母”。将众生视为母亲,是菩提心修法的开始,也是关键。
所谓念恩,是忆念母亲对我们的养育之恩。从十月怀胎开始,不仅给予我们色身、哺育我们成长,更在整个成长过程中悉心照料,付出难以计数的辛劳和关爱。我们在如是观想时,应当经常诵一诵《父母恩重难报经》,其中详细阐述了父母的恩情。
父母恩重如山,我们又怎能知恩不报呢?不仅要对今生的父母生起报恩心,也要对生生世世的父母生起报恩心,还要对一切如母有情生起报恩心。无始以来,所有众生都曾做过我们至亲的父母,不仅包括人类,也包括所有一切不同生命形态的有情。
然后是修慈,慈即与乐之心。认识到父母对我们的恩情,就应尽力报答,使他们获得快乐和幸福,也使一切众生获得快乐和幸福。唯有对一切众生心怀感恩,慈心才能普及。修慈也是有善巧的,可以先从自己的亲人、从自己喜欢的人开始修,逐渐过渡到关系中等乃至漠不相干的,最后是冤家仇人,如是逐渐推广至一切有情。按这个次第修习,可以一步步拓展我们的心量,在利他的同时改善自身心态。当我们心中能容纳更多众生时,狭隘的自我也在随之瓦解。我们的心,正是由于我法二执而落入局限,变得狭隘而渺小。若能对一切有情生起慈心,就能挣脱二执束缚,回归无限。
修悲,是拔除一切众生的痛苦。苦有三苦及八苦之分,前者为苦苦、行苦、坏苦,后者为生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、爱别离苦、怨憎会苦、求不得苦、五阴盛苦。从佛法观点来看,一切众生皆沉溺于苦海,即使暂享一时之乐,亦是长劫苦因。所以我们要生起悲心,发愿将其从痛苦中拯救出来。同时还要积极住持并弘扬佛法,如果没有佛法智慧的照耀,世间将变得暗无天日。这种"不忍众生苦,不忍圣教衰”之心,也正是我们上求佛道、下化众生的动力。
那么,怎样才能对众生产生不忍之心?面对众生的痛苦,我们时常熟视无睹,表现出事不关己的冷漠姿态。若是看到自己讨厌的人遭受痛苦,甚至还可能幸灾乐祸。这些都是修习慈悲过程中容易出现的问题。有时,别人来求法或求助,我们可能脱口而出就是"没有时间”。为什么我们更习惯拒绝而不是为他人提供帮助?正是因为我们对众生的痛苦不能感同身受。甚至还会给自己找到冠冕堂皇的借口:"我现在正忙着更重要的事。”
我执非常狡猾,当我们不想慈悲众生时,它会找到各种开脱的理由,使我们心安理得地原谅自己的错误,轻易获得心理平衡。事实上,有多少理由并不重要。重要的是,理由背后的动机是否为了利他?如果不是,再多的理由也不过是自欺欺人而已,只能将我们已有的错误变得更坚固,更隐蔽,更难以改正。由凡夫心转入佛菩萨那样的大慈大悲,不仅要以柔软心对待众生,深入体察其痛苦;更要以坚毅心对待自己,决不以任何理由姑息自我的诡计。
修习慈悲心,一方面是在座上观想。按藏传佛教的要求,必须每日三次修习菩提心仪轨。修习仪轨和观想的目的,都是为了长养这一心行。我们每观想一次,慈悲的力量就在思维中得到一次强化。在佛教修行中,可以用观想力来转换心念,因为修行所成就的并非客观结果。如果我们要办所学校,那么客观上的一所学校就是目标所在。但修行成果主要体现于内在转换,其关键在于心行运作。
每天不断观想,是转换心行的必要过程。依唯识原理而言,就是"种子生现行,现行熏种子”的过程。假如我们刚在座上修习了慈悲观,再看到一个原本讨厌的人,也不容易产生强烈的厌恶。即使没能很好地控制心念,事后也比较容易意识到这一错误,因此感到惭愧。所以,座上修和座下实践是相辅相成的两方面。在座上修习菩提心仪轨的同时,还应在生活中不断运用和调整。正如钻木取火那样,需要两块木头持续摩擦,才能碰撞出慈悲和智慧的火花。
学佛的最高成就,正是菩提心的圆满,慈悲的圆满。如果说只修一法就能使我们成佛,那一定非慈悲莫属。正如《华严经》所说:"虚空尚可量,菩提心难知,所以不可量,大慈无量故。”或许有人会问,佛果不是悲和智的成就吗?为何只修慈悲也能成就?这是因为,圆满的慈悲必然包含了智慧。若是没有空性慧,慈悲就无法达至究竟的圆满,无法摆脱杂染的凡夫心,只是有漏有限的世间善行。长期以来,对菩提心的弘扬往往侧重于利他,未曾强调智慧和慈悲的关系。事实上,修习慈悲同样离不开般若智慧的指导。倘若有悲无智,难免好心办坏事。所以,我们应当同时长养自身的慈悲和智慧,不可有丝毫偏废。
有了慈悲之后,应进一步生起增上意乐,即强烈的利他心。这是发起菩提心的引导力量,也是发起菩提心的殊胜因缘。
> 2.自他相换
除了"修心七要”,寂天菩萨的"自他相换”也是修习菩提心的重要教授。从理论上说,自他相换非常具有说服力。凡夫的特点是什么?正是爱执自我,舍弃众生,处处替自己着想,对他人漠不关心。我执源于无明,是与生俱来的力量,并在无尽生命延续中不断得到滋养。所以这种执著几乎贯穿一切心行,是构成凡夫人格的基本力量。
尽管在生命的某个层面,我们与佛菩萨是无二无别的,但目前的确还是凡夫,原因何在?正是无明和我执所致。一旦解决这两点,我们就不再是凡夫了。所有的烦恼和恶业也源于此,我执处处替自己包装,维护自身利益,想方设法地逃避一切于己不利之事。杀盗淫妄,哪一样不是因为我的贪、我的嗔、我的痴?我们纠缠于贪嗔痴,无非是为了寻求快乐,绝不是为了制造痛苦,但最终却给自己带来无尽苦果。所以说,我执乃一切衰损之门。
那么,我们建构并执著的"我”究竟是什么?当我们说到所执时,首先会涉及能执,也就是意识行为。但意识执著的这一切,不论是思维部分,还是身体部分,皆虚幻无常,无法找到固定的实质。生命的立足点何在?我们的安身立命处何在?我们执著的财富、家庭、事业都是暂时的,处于动荡变化中。生命真正的立足点,一定不是意识所执著的,以"我”或"非我”皆不足以概括。可以肯定的是,意识设定的一切自我,绝对是错误的。可是这种错误设定,无始以来却成为一切痛苦之源。我们设定了一个不稳定的对象,但作为自我来说,却要竭力维护这个不稳定。将不稳定当作稳定来维护,又是何其辛苦?可叹的是,我们始终都纠缠在这场毫无意义的奋斗中,几乎无人例外。学佛的首要目的,便是摧毁我执,阿罗汉正是因为超越我执,方能证悟涅槃,断除烦恼。
自他相换的修行,虽是从凡夫心着手,但必须具备一个认识前提,那就是真切意识到"我执乃一切衰损之门,利他为一切功德之本”。这两句话极为重要,诸佛菩萨之所以能解脱生死,成就无量功德,正是因为所思所行皆从利他出发。
利他似乎很平常,不少人都在做利他之事,包括许多没学佛的人。但利他究竟达到什么程度?如果以一百分来衡量利他的纯度,诸佛的纯度是一百,而凡夫的纯度至多只有几十乃至几分,此外还杂夹着贪心、我执、我慢等种种烦恼。作为凡夫来说,即使在利他时,生起的慈悲往往还比不上其中夹杂的我执,或是对功德的贪著。
最单纯的利他,才是最彻底的慈悲。其标准有二,一是达到三轮体空,一是以一切众生为对象。要做到这两点,必须深刻认识到执我的过患。我执不仅力量强大,且善于伪装。无论我们做什么,哪怕最自私的事,往往也能找到体面的借口,这正是我执的厉害之处。我们不妨反省一下,然后再观察一下他人,会发现人们无论做什么都能找到理由。做好事有理由,做坏事也有理由;有说得出口的理由,还有说不出口的理由;有应付他人的理由,有安慰自己的理由。所以,我们要善于揭穿自我的真面目。事实上,揭穿自我的把戏和阴谋,就像揭开自己见不得人的伤疤,痛苦是必然的。但我们别无选择,必须果断下手,否则仍会一如既往地被我执指使,一如既往地流转生死。
利他不仅能成就慈悲,还能打破我执。如果我执很强烈,一定无法纯粹地利他。当我们发心利他时,首先反对的一定是我执,制造障碍的同样是我执。这也从反面证明,利他是摧毁我执的有力武器。
充分认识到执我过患和利他功德后,就有资格修习自他相换了。将爱著自己、保护自己、处处设法利益自己的心,转而去利益众生;将舍弃众生、对众生漠不关心、事不关己高高挂起的心,转而用在自己身上。这就是自他相换的运作方式。如果我们能对有情生起自利那样的利乐之心,菩提心的种子就开始萌芽了。进一步,是对所有众生平等相待,没有丝毫亲疏之别,使利他心普及于一切。自他相换的修行,是引发菩提心的殊胜方便。只要我们踏踏实实地做,将逐步成就佛菩萨那样的无缘大慈,同体大悲。
> 3.十种因缘
汉传佛教中关于菩提心的教授,流传最广的,当推省庵大师的《劝发菩提心文》。其中谈到菩提心的八相,即邪正、真伪、大小、偏圆。我们初发心时,很难立刻到位,这就需要时时审视,这一发心究竟是邪是正,是真是伪,是大是小,是偏是圆?每一种都有相应标准,使我们可以逐一对照,看看自己存在哪些问题,及时调整。
在《劝发菩提心文》中,省庵大师就如何发起菩提心,总结了十种因缘。如果我们时常思维这些内容,会觉得发菩提心是人生的唯一选择,除此而外,再没什么比之更有意义。十种因缘分别是:念佛重恩、念父母恩、念师长恩、念施主恩、念众生恩、念生死苦、尊重己灵、忏悔业障、求生净土、令正法得久住。
首先是念佛重恩。因为有佛陀宣说法要,才有佛法在世间的流传,众生才因此找到解脱之路。佛陀以大慈大悲之心,在45年中苦口婆心地说法度众,我们如何才能报答这无比的恩情?必须发菩提心,"将此身心奉尘刹,是则名为报佛恩”。如果仅仅自了,是不足以报恩的。当然,前提是我们必须认识到佛陀之恩究竟有多深。这一认识又是基于对自身生命的强烈关注。若是我们没有将见道及了脱生死当作一回事,就无法体会佛陀对我们的恩德,认识佛法对人生的意义。若是我们在人生旅程中上下求索,遍学世间所有哲学、宗教后仍未觅得解脱之道,最后因佛法而找到出路。对于这样的人来说,才能真切体会佛陀之深恩。现代人闻法很容易,甚至坐在家里,也能通过录音、录像听闻法师说法,不易生起希有难得之心。事实上,闻法态度会直接影响到对法的受用。我们对法越珍视,受益会越大,反之亦然。
其次是念父母恩。养育之恩,无以为报。只有发起菩提心,才是对父母最好的报答。地藏菩萨在因地修行时,其母因邪知邪见,不信三宝,结果堕落恶道。地藏菩萨为救母发起大愿,但他发愿的当下,不仅使其母从地狱生到天上,也使当天处于无间地狱的所有众生皆上生天道。可见发起菩提心之后,不仅能报答现世父母的恩情,还能报答多生累劫父母的恩德。否则的话,自己尚且没有出路,又如何能报答父母深恩。
第三是念师长恩。在我们的成长过程中,因为有世间的师长,我们才能了解各种学问和道德;因为有出世的师长,我们才能听闻佛法,明了解脱途径。藏地对上师极其重视,确有其深意。上师不仅为我们传授正法,还能指导我们将法运用于修行实践。十方诸佛固然重要,但如果没有上师为桥梁,我们也无法成为佛弟子,无法于佛生信,于法起修并受益。有证量的上师,本身就是佛法僧的象征。通过对上师的恭敬,还能帮助我们摧毁我执,从恭敬中得到法的真实受用。如何才能报答师长之恩?也必须发菩提心,绍隆佛种。师长将修行之道传授给我们,我们唯有认真继承并弘扬,以此利益众生,才是如法的报答。
第四是念施主恩。现代人谋生不易,整日为生计奔忙。活着是为了生存,生存是为了活着。作为出家人,我们不必为生存操劳,可以过着追求真理、追求解脱的生活,真是天大的福报。所以不论生活条件如何,都应该对三宝和社会大众充满感恩。如何报答十方信施为我们创造的修学条件?还是要发菩提心,精进修学,弘法利生。唯有这样,才有福报消受十方信施。
第五是念众生恩。一切众生无始以来都曾和我们互为父母兄妹,都曾有恩于我们。但在生死流转中,他们或堕于地狱道,或沉沦饿鬼道,或辗转畜生道,即使有幸投身善趣,亦不能永久享乐,一旦福报享尽,必然堕落。如果我们只想着个人解脱,一走了之,于心何忍?想到众生对我们的恩情,想到众生的痛苦,我们唯有发起菩提心,以救度一切如母众生为己任,上报四重恩,下济三涂苦。如此,才能回馈社会,回馈众生。
第六是念生死苦。在无尽生死中,我们什么都曾经历过,下过地狱,当过畜生,即使生而为人,也未必活得快乐。在过去的生命旅程中,我们可能像很多人那样,不曾听闻佛法,过得庸庸碌碌,迷茫困惑。我们一天又一天地蹉跎岁月,一生又一生地浪费时光。在生命洪流中,我们能把握的只有当下这一念,只有当下这个时刻,甚至明天都无法把握。我们能保证明天还继续活着吗?过去已然过去,我们无法把握;未来不曾到来,我们也无法把握。如何利用当下这一身份改善生命?唯一可做的还是发菩提心。当然,也可以发出离心。但只发出离心的话,就不能利益一切众生,终非圆满的发心。
第七是尊重己灵。我们或许不曾想到,自己和诸佛菩萨、历代祖师本是无二无别的。在我们的心性中,和他们有着相同的层面。但他们已经成佛作祖,我们还在轮回中流转。我们本具无价珍宝,如今却以乞讨为生,如何对得起自家宝藏?基于对这一生命品质的重视,我们也应该发起菩提心。否则,永远无法将此珍宝开发出来,只能任其湮没。当然,声闻人也开发,但不能完整开发。唯有发起菩提心的诸佛菩萨,才能彻底开发这一宝藏,圆满发挥其所有功用。
第八是忏悔业障。忏悔的方式很多,最佳方式当推发菩提心。发菩提心之后,左右我们生命的便是菩提心而不是业障。我们知道,业是推动生命流转的力量。我们现在的身份,便是一期业力形成的结果。所谓命运,也与业力息息相关,由引业、满业构成生命的总报和别报,有一定规律可循。但命运又是可以改变的,一旦发起菩提心,命运将依循菩提心的轨道发展,不再随着业力设定的方向漂流。因为菩提心乃诸善中王,其力量之猛,不可抵挡。发起菩提心,就已把握命运之舵。所以真正发起菩提心之后,不必再有任何顾忌,因为菩提心的力量能摧毁一切。全宇宙的力量有多大?而菩提心能将全宇宙的力量集于一念,还有什么可以阻挡它?所以说,忏悔的最佳方式也是发菩提心。
第九是求生净土。净土行人以念佛求生极乐,事实上,往生净土的最佳方法还是发菩提心。依菩提心修行,临命终时,菩提愿王能在一念间将我们推到西方净土,成等正觉,然后根据自身意愿前往十方世界说法度众。正如《普贤行愿品》所言:"又复是人临命终时......唯此愿王,不相舍离,于一切时,引导其前。一刹那中,即得往生极乐世界。到已即见阿弥陀佛、文殊师利菩萨、普贤菩萨、观自在菩萨、弥勒菩萨等。此诸菩萨色相端严,功德具足,所共围绕。其人自见生莲华中,蒙佛授记。得授记已,经于无数百千万亿那由他劫,普于十方不可说不可说世界,以智慧力,随众生心而为利益。不久当坐菩提道场,降伏魔军,成等正觉,转妙法轮,能令佛刹极微尘数世界众生发菩提心,随其根性,教化成熟,乃至尽于未来劫海,广能利益一切众生。”
第十是令正法得久住。住持佛法,根本还是在于发菩提心。发心之后,我们的力量就取之不尽、用之不竭了。如果依凡夫心行做事,难免三心二意。今天想着度化众生,明天又想还是自己闭关修行。这是出家人最容易出现的心态,这一刻是进,下一刻又想退。为什么世人认为出家人消极?因为我们进退都能找到依据。佛法博大精深,似乎怎么做都有确凿的理由。之所以这样,只是在不同修行阶段的侧重点不同罢了。如果我们发起菩提心,就应以能否利益众生作为衡量标准。
经常思考这十大理由,可为发菩提心打下坚实的基础。当我们全面审视生命之后,会看到发菩提心是唯一有意义的选择。如果不是基于对生命的终极关怀,人生似乎可以有很多选择,可以这么发展,还可以那么发展。但这些选择都不是最究竟的,只有暂时的利益。为了一点眼前利益浪费暇满人身,这个代价太昂贵了,我们付得起吗?只怕想后悔时就来不及了。唯有发起菩提心,生命才能找到出路,才能从轮回中彻底解脱出来。不仅使自己解脱,同时使一切众生获得解脱。
七、菩提心的特征
凡夫的心灵世界中,每种心行皆有不同特征:贪心有贪心的特征,嗔心有嗔心的特征,慢心有慢心的特征。那么,菩提心的特征又是怎样的呢?《华严经》告诉我们:"发菩提心者,所谓发大悲心,普救一切众生故;发大慈心,等佑一切世间故;发安乐心,令一切众生灭诸苦故;发饶益心,令一切众生离恶法故;发哀愍心,有怖畏者,咸守护故;发无碍心,舍离一切诸障碍故;发广大心,一切法界咸遍满故;发无边心,等虚空界无不往故;发宽博心,悉见一切诸如来故;发清净心,于三世法,智无违故;发智慧心,普入一切智慧海故。”
此外,许多大乘经论皆从不同角度对菩提心的内涵加以阐述,内容极为丰富。根据我个人的修学心得,主要可归纳为以下几点。若能把握这些要领,发心决不会出现方向性的偏差。
> 1.觉 悟
凡夫心之特点为不觉,又称无明。因无明所惑,导致我法二执及贪嗔痴三毒,由此造作轮回之业,所以十二缘起的第一支即为无明。凡夫因无明而念念不觉,我执生起时,因不觉而陷入我执的泥沼中;贪心生起时,因不觉而陷入贪心的捆绑中;嗔心生起时,因不觉而陷入嗔心的怒火中。不断执著贪嗔痴及所缘影像,越陷越深,结果是长劫流转。
菩提心则代表了觉悟的力量。正如《大乘本生心地观经》所言:"自觉悟心能发菩提,此觉悟心即菩提心,无有二相。”凡夫和圣贤的区别,关键就在于迷和悟的一念间,"前念迷即凡,后念悟即佛;前念著境即烦恼,后念离境即菩提。”发起菩提心,标志着有情生命的觉醒。这一觉醒驱散了无明长夜,照破了生死迷梦。菩提心的修行中,必须以觉悟为本,于念念中保持觉醒,观五欲六尘为梦幻泡影,对贪嗔痴及凡夫心的显现了了分明,不随其转。故《大集经》云:"云何名为发菩提心?了知贪性则名发心,若复了知嗔痴悭妒阴入诸界,无明行识名色六入,乃至生老病死大苦,是名发心。”可见,了知贪嗔痴的真相,也是发菩提心的重要内涵。
身为菩萨,不仅了知我执是一切过患之本,更了知利他乃成就功德之源。"菩萨”之称,源自梵语菩提萨埵,意为觉有情。所以菩萨在自觉的同时,更以觉他为己任,以大慈、大悲、大喜、大舍之四无量心济度众生,共同迈向觉行圆满的境地。
> 2.无我利他
凡夫心是执"我”的。生活中,人们最常想到的正是自己。一生都在为我的衣食住行、名利地位、事业财富而拼搏。然而,世间的一切烦恼痛苦、是非纷争也无不因"我”而起。
无我,是佛法不共世间和外道的核心思想,佛教中列为三法印之一。无论声闻乘还是菩萨道的修行,都建立在无我的基础上。声闻行者因了知无我而成就解脱,菩萨行者因通达无我而能全然利他。在发菩提心、行菩萨道的过程中,最大的障碍便是我执。因为凡夫心的特点是处处为"我”着想,这一习气根深蒂固。当我们发心利益一切众生时,必然面临和自我利益的尖锐冲突。唯有铲除前进路上的障碍,我们才能在菩提大道勇往直前。那么,如何解除这一障碍?佛法告诉我们,我执乃无明所致,因不了解生命真相,或执著色身为我,或执著各种想法为我,或执著财产事业为我。若以般若智慧观照,便能明了诸法皆因缘和合之假相,无常亦无我。
彻见"我”的虚幻不实,执我也就毫无意义,自他之间的鸿沟亦将不复存在。通达无我,才能彻底地利他;通过利他的修行,又能不断瓦解我执。《金刚经》特别强调将无我见落实于修行中:"菩萨发阿耨多罗三藐三菩提心者,当生如是心,我应灭度一切众生,令入无余涅槃界。如是灭度一切众生已,而无一众生实灭度者。何以故?须菩提,若菩萨有我相、人相、众生相、寿者相,则非菩萨。何以故?须菩提,实无有法,名为菩萨发阿耨多罗三藐三菩提心者。”类似的经文在经中多处出现,谆谆告诫发菩提心的行者,在修习菩萨道过程中,须以空性慧了知"无我相、无人相、无众生相、无寿者相”,如此,才能成为合格的菩萨。
> 3.无 限
凡夫心是有限的。其中的所有心理活动,皆来自生命延续中某些经验的积累,亦有其特定对象。贪心有贪心的所缘,嗔心有嗔心的所缘,慢心有慢心的所缘,这些所缘必然是有限的。人们只会对喜乐之境生起贪著,不可能贪著一切;只会对不如意的对境生起嗔心,不可能嗔恨一切。
菩提心则不同,其所缘是无限的。发起菩提心,是以十方一切众生为对象,以利益一切众生为使命。这一点,是许多大乘经典都谈到的。《华严经》云:"菩萨不为教化调伏一众生故发菩提心,不为教化调伏百众生故发菩提心,乃至不为教化调伏不可说不可说转众生故发菩提心......是故,善男子!严净一切世界尽,我愿乃尽;拔一切众生烦恼习气尽,我愿乃满。”这是何等宏大深广的愿力。
《金刚经》中,佛陀亦就发心问题如是开示:"菩萨摩诃萨,应如是降伏其心,所有一切众生之类,若卵生,若胎生,若湿生,若化生;若有色,若无色;若有想,若无想,若非有想非无想,我皆令入无余涅槃而灭度之。”同样告诉我们,菩萨应以救度一切众生为所缘,不论其身处何道,也不论其生命形态如何,都是菩萨全力救度的对象,无一例外。
《胜天王般若波罗蜜经》中,则有这样一段对话:"世尊,云何发菩提心?佛言:大王,如生大悲。世尊,云何生大悲?佛言:不舍一切众生。”佛菩萨之心量,因为不舍众生而宽广无限。在我们所熟悉的《普贤行愿品》的十大愿王中,不论礼敬诸佛还是恒顺众生,每一愿皆以尽虚空、遍法界、十方三世一切诸佛,或尽法界、虚空界、十方刹海所有众生为所缘,充分体现了菩提心的广大和无限。
> 4.平 等
凡夫心是不平等的。因为凡夫有我执及我所执,注定不能平等对待一切。因为有我,就有自他之分;有我所,就有亲疏之别。身为凡夫,总是执我而弃他,而在人与人的关系中,更是充满好恶取舍,因而导致世界的种种不平等现象。
菩萨的修行,要从不平等的凡夫心中摆脱出来。发起菩提心之后,一方面要通过闻思经教认识到一切法的平等,认识到一切众生的平等;一方面要在观修和实践中,对有情生起真实的平等心。对于菩萨行者而言,倘若还有丝毫好恶亲疏的分别,就不能成为合格的菩萨。正如宗大师在《道次第》中所指出的:"若不先断除对于一类有情起贪,及对一类有情起嗔之分类而修平等心者,则任随生起慈悲,仍有类别。”所以,平等舍心也是菩萨行者必须修习的重要内容。
菩萨的慈悲,乃无缘大慈,同体大悲。无缘,即没有任何附加条件;同体,即没有自他和好恶亲疏之别。这样的慈悲是建立在自他平等的基础上。《普贤行愿品》告诉我们:"以于众生心平等故,则能成就圆满大悲。”因为对一切众生平等无别,所以成就圆满大悲。事实上,不仅菩萨行者应保持平等,佛陀也是这样为我们作出了榜样。《佛说海意菩萨所问净印法门经》中,与会菩萨如此赞叹道:"了知平等菩提心,世尊常行平等法。”世尊所行,正说明了修习平等心的意义所在。
> 5.无相、无所得
凡夫心是著相的。因为凡夫充满自性见,对身心世界的一切都生起实在感,执著有实在的美丑、垢净,有实在的我和我所,所以做任何事都带着有所得之心。若是立足于有相、有所得的凡夫心,无论怎样努力,最后成就的仍是凡夫心。
而菩提心是无相的。首先,"菩萨应离一切相发阿耨多罗三藐三菩提心”,发心即是无相。其次,在行菩萨道过程中亦不能住相。正如《金刚经》所说:"(布施时)应不住色生心,不住声香味触法生心,应生无所住心。”在这段经文中,佛陀告诫我们:布施时不可住布施相,不可执著有能施的我、所受的他及所施之物。唯有三轮体空,才能圆满布施波罗蜜,成为菩萨道的资粮。否则,与人天善行何异?布施如此,六度万行莫不如此。第三,菩萨修习一切法门时,不仅不能住相,更不能生有所得之心。这正是《金刚经》强调的,"实无有法名阿罗汉。世尊,若阿罗汉作是念,我得阿罗汉道,则为著我、人、众生、寿者。世尊,佛说我得无诤三昧,人中最为第一,是第一离欲阿罗汉。我不作是念,我是离欲阿罗汉。世尊,我若作是念,我得阿罗汉道,世尊则不说须菩提是乐阿兰那行者。以须菩提实无所行,而名须菩提是乐阿兰那行。”无论住相或有所得,都是凡夫心的表现。唯有通达无相、无所得,才能成就胜义菩提心,圆成无上佛果。
菩提心的实践,由愿菩提心落实于行菩提心。无论发愿还是行持,都应依菩提心的特征来检讨,检查这一心行是觉还是不觉?是有我还是无我?是利己还是利他?是平等还是分别?是有限还是无限?是住相还是离相?是有所得还是无所得?菩提心的实践过程,正是不断调整心行的过程。如果发心是不觉、有我、利己、分别、有限、住相、有所得,那就说明我们还是地道的凡夫。反之,如果我们的发心具足觉悟、无我、利他、平等、无限、无住、无所得的特点,才是合格的菩提心,是与诸佛菩萨不二的心行。
八、菩提心的实践典范
论及菩提心的实践典范,首推诸佛菩萨。我们读诵《药师琉璃光如来本愿功德经》《无量寿经》《地藏菩萨本愿功德经》等大乘经典时,不应仅仅关注佛菩萨可以为我们做些什么,更应看到佛菩萨是如何成就的。他们在因地的实践和法门,正是我们修学的最佳榜样。佛菩萨有各自的愿力和行门,或是从大悲入手,或是从智慧入手,为我们展现了不同的修行道路。
如果感觉自己和文殊菩萨比较有缘,可以选择文殊法门修学,像文殊菩萨那样,深入经藏,智慧如海;感觉自己和地藏菩萨比较有缘,可以选择地藏法门修学,像地藏菩萨那样,地狱不空,誓不成佛。如果以观音菩萨作为修学榜样,就应以观音菩萨的愿力作为自己的愿力,以观音菩萨的行持作为自己的行为标准,像菩萨那样寻声救苦,千处有求千处应,万人称念万人灵。如果以阿弥陀佛作为修学榜样,就应以阿弥陀佛的四十八愿作为修行理念,时刻牢记自己的目标是成就清净国土,利益无边众生。
我们甚至可以观想自己是观音菩萨或阿弥陀佛的化身,确立了这样的身份,更能策励我们以佛菩萨之大愿为己任,发心求正觉,忘己济群生。学佛者固然应当谦和低调,但这种勇于承担的精神极其重要。否则的话,甘居凡夫阶位,只知向佛祈求,不知行佛所行,如何能于自身成就佛菩萨品质?当我们将自己定位为佛菩萨的化身后,还应心行上不断向他们靠拢,最终觉行圆满,与观音菩萨或阿弥陀佛无二无别。
事实上,观音菩萨和阿弥陀佛在因地也是这样成就的。不仅他们是这样成就的,诸佛菩萨都是这样成就的。释迦牟尼佛之前还有很多释迦牟尼佛,阿弥陀佛之前也有很多阿弥陀佛,所谓"南无西方极乐世界三十六万亿一十一万九千五百同名同号阿弥陀佛”。他们最初修行时,也是寻找一位古佛作为学习典范。观音菩萨是向观音古佛学习,然后修习大悲法门而成就。佛菩萨是这么做的,我们也完全可以这么做。直接从某位佛菩萨的愿力和行门着手,观想自己就是观音菩萨或阿弥陀佛的化身,会得到极大的加持,比单纯依靠一己之力修行更容易契入。
在藏地,时常听说某位祖师是观音菩萨化身,某位祖师是文殊菩萨化身。事实上,将某位佛菩萨作为本尊修行,最后所成就的,正是这位佛菩萨具备的品行。从这个角度看,那些说法并非没有根据,不必视为神话。当然,不排除其中有附会和渲染的成分。本尊的修行并不神秘,我们完全可以将其中的方法运用于修习菩提心中。
我平时住在南普陀后山,那里是观音菩萨的道场。我在禅坐时,就将整个五老峰观想为观音菩萨的坛场,将自己观想为菩萨的化身,具备菩萨那样的大慈大悲,然后将这种悲心散发到十方世界,希望所有众生都因无尽的慈悲而离苦得乐。当我们作这样的观想时,和菩萨的心行是相应的。当然,我们还达不到观音菩萨那种纯度和强度,质量还有待进一步提高。但通过不断的修习和强化,就能在心行上逐渐接近。久而久之,不仅能在座上观修时对有情生起无限悲心,也能渐渐落实到生活中。到那时,我们就是观音菩萨名副其实的化身了。
我们可以将大乘经典中重要的佛菩萨及相关法门都找出来。有关观音菩萨的内容,整理成"观音菩萨与观音法门”;有关地藏菩萨的内容,整理成"地藏菩萨与地藏法门”。这需要做两方面的工作,一是了解这位菩萨在因地上如何修行,二是这一法门具有哪些特征。这样,不仅对自身修学大有裨益,也能为发心修学菩萨行的同道提供学习方便。在大乘经论中,不是缺乏修行方法,而是我们不曾注意到,不曾找到契入的途径。
《华严经》云:"心、佛及众生,是三无差别。”在法性的层面,我们和佛菩萨并无本质的不同。相反,我们和佛菩萨具有相同的本质。当我们在观想中将自身与佛菩萨融为一体,在心行上产生作用的,恰恰就是佛菩萨的品质。通过这种观想,通过对佛菩萨行为的仿效,我们才能启动生命内在与佛菩萨无二无别的高贵品质。否则,修行还是落于凡夫心上,无法实现本质的超越。
尽管我们与佛菩萨有着本质上的相同,但内心还是觉得佛菩萨遥遥不可企及。原因在于,在我们生命中产生主导作用的始终是凡夫心,最终成就的也只能是凡夫心。如果我们能依佛菩萨的愿力修行,心行就会逐步向其靠拢。在修行之初,这种愿心仍属于世俗菩提心,而非胜义菩提心。但我们不必气馁,如果世俗菩提心能调到位的话,就像透过玻璃看到的虚空,虽然和实际的虚空隔了一层,却已经接近了。只要坚持不懈地努力,终有一天会将这面玻璃砸得粉碎,将自己融入空性的海洋中。
我觉得,如果仔细研究大乘所有菩萨的行门,完全可以将其整理为具体的修行指导,且具有很强的操作性,能引领我们按部就班地修起来。事实上,从行门入手比从理上入手更有力量。佛教徒中,有相当一部分人修得很冷漠,其中多数都是从理上入手,过分沉浸于理论中,对现实漠不关心。如果我们从菩提心入手,以佛菩萨的行门为起点,再通过见来调整心行,修学将非常积极。我们会主动地弘法利生,自觉地担当菩萨事业,而不仅仅是以"少事少业少希望住”自足。
九、结 语
菩提心的内容介绍到此,只是从整体上为大家概括了发心纲领。其实,每部大乘经典都可作为菩提心的教材,可立足于菩提心来诠释。无论《华严经》《金刚经》还是《大智度论》《瑜珈师地论》,皆有完整的发心方法,代表不同的发心层次。
我们有幸听闻佛法,找到解脱烦恼的方法,实为多生累劫的福报。无始以来,我法二执始终在伤害我们。如果不能在修行上有所突破,烦恼会尽未来际地困扰我们,这是学佛需要解决的根本问题。与生命内在的改善相比,外在的一切微不足道,多一些知识或是多一个文凭,有如梦幻泡影。即使像国王那样坐拥天下,也不过是几十年的荣华富贵,短暂而虚幻。在无尽的生命洪流中,修行才是我们唯一的出路。只有沿着佛陀指示的解脱之路走下去,我们才能找到光明,从生死大梦中醒来。
发起菩提心,是对自我的巨大挑战,这也是发心过程中面临的巨大困难。但只要将菩提心发到位,一切烦恼便不在话下。因为烦恼无非是因我法二执而起,而菩提心正是摧毁二执的最佳利器。在佛法中,通常采用不同的方法来对治不同的烦恼,但最高的修行法门,仅仅一招就将一切搞定,所谓以不变应万变。菩提心教法,正是功力无可匹敌的一招。只要运用起来,所有问题皆可迎刃而解。
我真切地期望,菩提心这一殊胜教法能广为传播,使菩提心的种子遍洒中华大地。当然,仅仅有热情还不够,以菩提心教法打前阵的同时,还须以上乘的用心方法深入引导。正如佛典所言:"菩萨摩诃萨复有二种正行坚固菩提心。何等为二?一者正念菩提行,二者修行禅定,断诸烦恼行。”般若和方便,一为母,一为父,两者缺一不可。成佛是悲和智的成就,具体而言,正是菩提心和空性见的成就。若是从这两方面入手,成就一批真正的修行人,汉传佛教的面貌必有全新改观。
十、问  答
学员:发菩提心是否必须以出离心为基础?
法师:出离心和菩提心属于两种不同层面的发心。大乘经论中主要以菩提心为主,较少涉及出离心。而在《阿含》等声闻经论中,则以出离心为要,几乎不谈菩提心。将出离心和菩提心联系起来,主要体现在宗喀巴大师建构的《道次第》中。
早期的声闻行者可分两类:一是趣寂声闻,一是回小向大声闻。前者发出离心,且一发到底,直接证悟阿罗汉果,不更进求佛道。他们出离三界之心极其强烈,别无他求,因此佛陀演说《法华经》时有五千声闻退席,这类就属于趣寂声闻。还有一类声闻,接触声闻教法后又有机会学习大乘,最终回小向大,由出离心转向菩提心。
民国年间,太虚大师对法尊法师翻译的《道次第》极为赞叹,因为这条路确实稳当。宗大师以出离心、菩提心、空性见建构的三主要道,纠正了学人修行中极易出现的流弊。以出离心为基础,既帮助我们摆脱凡夫心,又能引发真实无伪的菩提心,具有重要意义。尽管许多大乘经论中并未强调这一次第,直接由发菩提心入手,但解脱轮回之苦,始终是修行的重要前提。
若是出离心仅指出离轮回及对三界的执著,这一内涵已囊括在菩提心内。菩提心具备无相、无住、无所得的特点,自然不著五欲六尘。所以说,菩提心本身就含摄出离心的部分内涵。根机特别好的人可以直接从菩提心入手,这也是大乘经教往往只谈发菩提心却没有强调出离心的原因。只是对一般人而言,菩提心不容易立刻发起来,更不容易发到位。若知见不清,发心过程中极易与凡夫心混淆,根本不清楚自己发的究竟是什么心,甚至将人天乘的善心当作菩提心。如果以出离心为基础,菩提心的纯度会更有保障。
我们还要注意的是,发心固然可以遵循从出离心至菩提心的常规道路,但发起出离心并证悟空性后,未必能成就大慈大悲,未必能导向菩提心,否则就没有声闻乘和菩萨乘之分了。汉传佛教中,禅宗行者也好,净土行者也好,虽然学的是大乘佛教,诵的是大乘经典,但往往只发了出离心,将个人了生脱死当作一切,反而忘却了菩提心。发起菩提心,必须通过相应的观察和思维,将慈悲引发出来。也就是说,它并非任运就能生起,还需要因缘的成就,正如修禅定未必能开智慧一样。在一般人的印象中,似乎得定之后智慧将一触即发,事实非如此。否则,外道如何将四禅八定作为最终目标、究竟涅槃呢?"由定生慧”只是说明,得定是发慧的条件之一,还需修习无常观、缘起观、无我观等,才能引发无漏智慧。
学员:若无出离心为基础而直接发菩提心,能否断烦恼、了生死?人生佛教与菩提心的关系如何?
法师:发起菩提心,连佛果都能成就,难道不能断烦恼吗?所有的修行法门中,以菩提心的功德和力量为最。关于这一点,《华严经》弥勒菩萨赞叹菩提心的颂文中阐述得极为详尽。
现在所提倡的人生佛教,如能赋予菩提心和空性见的内涵,就能直接抵达佛果,真正贯彻太虚大师所说的"人成即佛成”。但从目前来看,人生佛教的弘扬确实存在肤浅化的倾向,有必要对其内涵加以深化。道在人弘,人生佛教的旗帜固然契机,关键还在于怎样弘扬,赋予其什么见地和高度。
学员:发心是否也有顿渐之分?是否可能直接由胜义菩提心契入?
法师:法门的顿渐,是由知见高低决定的。《华严》的"初发心即成正觉”,一超直入如来地,可谓圆顿之极,至高无上。而禅宗和大圆满的教法也告诉我们,即使在凡夫心的层面,觉悟心也是可以触及的。因为烦恼是无自性的,体会到这一点,每个念头生起的当下即可解脱。如同蛇,自己就能将反复缠绕所成的结解开,毋须再借他力。不过,这些教法对根机的要求很高,一般人未必修得起来。相比之下,唯识教法是从妄心层面入手,比较容易把握。但依唯识教理修行,发心就是发心,结果就是结果,三大阿僧祇劫慢慢走来,很难相信现生可以见道,可以了生死。所以唯识学人在修行上往往容易松懈,民国年间许多学唯识的后来多学成哲学,这一流弊影响至今。
修行的常道,是从愿菩提心、行菩提心进至胜义菩提心。大家可以先从这一常规路线入手,积累一些资粮,才有机缘和能力修习直接契入的教法。
学员:在发菩提心的过程中,最大的障碍是什么?
法师:发心过程中,最大的敌人正是"我执”。我执无比狡诈,会利用所学的一切知识甚至佛法来干扰我们的心,其理由往往冠冕堂皇,让人无法拒绝。所以,我们必须明确认识到:自己究竟要成就什么?这点非常重要。我们的发心决定了最终的成就,但涉及具体事务时,往往很难分清究竟是哪种心在起作用。比如我们住持道场、弘法利生,看来似乎都是在发菩提心,或许我们自己也以为是在大转法轮,广度众生,以为和佛菩萨相差无几。可真正的心行基础是什么呢?仔细分析的话,可能是贪著,也可能是我执,这样的现象比比皆是。到后来,事业做得越大,对事业的贪著也越深。如果这样,最后成就的必然是我执,是地道的凡夫心。
学员:我们应当首先利益众生,还是成就后再利益众生?自利和利他是否有先后次第?
法师:在菩提心教法中,有三种不同的发心方式,即国王式、船夫式和牧人式。
首先是国王式的发心,认为自己得成为国王,才有能力广济群生。这种发心侧重以自利为先,修行到相当程度后再开始利他。当然,目标始终是"为利有情愿成佛”,而不是为了个人成就。藏传佛教中的米拉日巴尊者,即属于这类发心。其次是船夫式的发心,和乘客同舟共济,同时修行,同登彼岸。历代许多大德都是在自我修行的同时,积极弘法利生。第三是牧人式的发心,先要把牛羊赶回家。地藏菩萨就是其中的典型,其愿力为"众生度尽方证菩提,地狱不空誓不成佛”,只考虑众生,完全没有考虑自己。
关于这几种发心方式,每个人可以根据自己的情况去选择。有些人适合做国王,有些人愿意做船夫,也有些人希望做牧人。不论选择什么方式,共同前提和发心基础必须是利他。也就是说,在发心过程中不可有任何夹杂。若是有丝毫的杂染或自利色彩,必然无法破除我执,圆成菩提。
学员:藏传佛教中谈到,发菩提心者不可以舍弃任何众生,但又特别强调应远离破戒者,如何解决这一矛盾?
法师:在修学过程中,需要亲近善知识,远离恶知识。孔子亦云:无友不如己者。也就是说,应与胜过自己的朋友交游,才能见贤思齐。这一教授对初学者尤其重要。因为初学者往往善恶不辨,易受环境影响,所以对环境的要求必须严格,于增进学业和完善人格皆有益处。
但学有所成之后,就要以一切众生为度化对象,此时便无善知识及恶知识之分了。地藏菩萨发愿前往地狱,一定不是去那里亲近善知识的。从菩萨道修行来说,发起菩提心后,一方面要亲近善知识,一方面要慈悲利他,不可舍弃任何众生。当我们说到不舍众生时,关键是在于心行。只要对每个众生平等无别,慈悲便是圆满的。
所以这两个教授并不矛盾。佛法是针对众生的不同根机而施设,在不同修行阶段,要求也有所不同。
学员:如何才能圆满自己的发心?必须将众生度尽吗?佛果功德要达到什么标准?
法师:成就无上菩提,固然是以一切众生为度化对象,但并非将众生度尽才能成佛,因为度众生也是因缘法,不是你想度就能度的。佛果功德的积累,也不在于达到怎样的量才能圆满。在一般人的理解中,总以为菩萨三大阿僧祇劫的修行,必须积累多少福德,度化多少众生才合格。就像在社会上,获得博士学位、教授资格需要多少成果那样。但成佛并非事相上的成就,亦非外在功德的成就,若是执著功德相,就无法圆成佛果。
当我们说到度化一切众生时,别忘了自己也是众生。当然,关键不在于度了自己还是他人,而在于我们的发心是否缘法界一切众生。当我们修行时,不在于修利己行还是利他行,也不在于修止观还是修布施,关键看这一行为的发心是什么,所缘是什么?这才是根本所在。若是发心圆满,所修一切善行,包括自己的修证功德,都是成佛的资粮。
理解这个道理就会发现,不论国王式的发心,还是船夫、牧人式的发心,本质上并没有区别。即使暂时将重点放在自我修证,发心也是为了利他而非自己。比如禅修属于自利还是利他?若是因为厌弃世间、逃避责任打坐,对众生缺乏悲心,仅以自了为足,当然不是利他行。反之,若是为了更好地度化众生修行,同样是打坐,就属于利他行的范畴了。可见,关键取决于发心,而不是行为本身。在修行的各个阶段,我们可以有不同侧重,但发心必须圆满,这点极为重要。
过去,修行者更重视的是止息恶行,而菩提心教法还要求我们积极地成就善法,饶益有情,圆满慈悲。在这个时代,特别需要普及菩提心教法。发起广大愿心之后,力量会源源不断。
学员:发心之初还比较猛利,但往往不能坚持,应该如何解决?
法师:发心的困难,正在于发得准确,发得长久。这和"做一件好事容易,难的是一辈子做好事”同理。心行的力量源于积累,发一次只有一次的力量,况且这一次还未必发得纯粹。菩提心教法,正是要帮助大家持续、准确地发心,并通过见地、实践逐步巩固这一发心。其中,见是用于调整心行,实践则使菩提心落到实处,在心行产生稳定、持续的作用。如此,使菩提心的力量日渐增长。
学员:如何实践菩提心呢?
法师:菩提心的实践,包括观想和利他行两个方面。通过观想,使自己时刻心系众生,行住坐卧皆不忘利他。这种用心方法,在《华严经·净行品》中有很多具体指导。吃饭时,希望天下众生都能衣食无忧;健康快乐时,希望天下众生同样健康快乐;遭遇挫折时,希望自己承受的一切,能使天下众生远离挫折。时时这样观想,带着这样的心做每件事,菩提心一定会迅速增长。
当我们有机会利他时,应将对方视为成就菩提心的善因缘,心怀感恩,并在做的过程中不忘初心,念念为利益众生而做。在成就菩提心之前,这么做确实有些难度,但只要我们有信心,并坚持不懈地练习,这一心行就能得到巩固。久而久之,菩提心就能任运生起。
学员:菩提心与正见的关系如何?
法师:发起菩提心之后,见就有了用武之地。无论是中观见或唯识见,都能指导我们调整心行,将附着于菩提心的杂质一一剔除。强调菩提心的重要性,决非否定教理的作用。但必须明确的是,不可将谈空说有作为修学目的。
在学佛过程中,正见极为重要。知见不正,修行必然无法提高。禅宗很重视见的作用,所谓"只贵子见地,不贵子行履”。这个见不仅是闻思的见,更是心行的见。如果见地没有到位,即使每日精进苦修,修了些什么呢?反之,见地正了,搬柴运水、语静动默皆为无上妙行。所以说,见和菩提心是一体不二的。见需要着力点,才能发挥其功用。发起菩提心,见就找到了着力点。
学员:如何看待五种性?如果一个人注定是无种性,能否发菩提心?
法师:唯识宗将种性归纳为声闻、缘觉、菩萨、无种性和不定种性五种。按唯识的说法,种性决定了将来的成就。若是不具备菩萨种性,成佛必定无望。若是具备菩萨种性,生命起点就高于声闻。
众生虽然是平等的,但无始以来的积累,确实造就了生命起点的不同。有些人善根深厚;有些人障深慧浅;有些人生来具有菩萨倾向,热心公益;也有些人天性冷淡,对社会漠不关心。但从缘起看世间,我们不该将这些差别理解为固定不变的。所以我比较倾向一切众生皆可发菩提心,皆可培养为菩萨种性,但因为起点不同,难易程度会有区别。对那些乐于助人、充满悲心的人来说,菩提心和其天性相应,发起来相对容易。而对那些性情冷漠、孤僻的人来说,发心的难度自然大得多。但只要努力并且方向正确,最终都能有所成就。
学员:应当如何抉择利他行?比如吃不完的饼干,应该喂鱼还是和乞丐结缘?有人说,喂鱼不会造业。但也有人倾向于布施乞丐,因为人身难得,比鱼离成佛更近。
法师:从菩提心教法来说,把人救度完之后才开始对鱼慈悲,本身就是不对的。如果这样的话,菩提心永远无法圆满。众生是帮助不尽、救度不完的,何时才有成就的一天?所以关键不在于度化的客观结果,而在于对每个众生都充满慈悲,决不舍弃其中任何一位。不论对动物还是人,都要具有平等无别的悲心,这样的心行才是圆满的。若心中还有高低之分,最后成就的只能是不平等的凡夫心。佛菩萨的慈悲是一味平等的,对人是百分之百,对鱼也是百分之百。发心决定了最后的成就,这点必须牢记在心。
当然,利他还要有智慧。像这样的情况,究竟谁更需要?怎样分配更合理?有了智慧,自然知道如何抉择。恒顺众生,并非众生需要什么就给什么,更不是顺着众生的欲望和贪嗔痴行事,必须考虑对众生是否真正有益,以此作为取舍标准。所以在菩提心的实践中,首先是发心纯正,然后再以智慧抉择。
学员:请问学习中观和发菩提心的关系?
法师:空性见,是菩提心的重要组成部分。菩提心所具有的无相、无我、无所得等特征,皆属于空性见的范畴。若是没有这些认识,菩提心必然发不到位,也无法圆满。因为菩提心不是说法,还需要到现实中检验。为什么我们觉得菩提心发不起来?为什么对众生有抵触?就是因为把自己和众生看得实实在在,所以就有对立,有分别。如果认识到万法都是无相、无我、无所得的,便能接纳一切众生。既然自他是一体的,生起利他的菩提心就不是难事了。
三藏十二部典籍和一切修行法门都可汇归于菩提心,并在修学菩提心的过程中找到位置。所以说,菩提心是佛法的核心,可以统摄大乘一切法门。
学员:菩提心应如何落到实处?
法师:我们现在的心行虽然是凡夫心,但即使在这个层面,若有上乘的用心方法,也是可以触及本觉的。首先,必须找到心行的立足点。凡夫心的立足点是分别、执著、有限,这就需要调整,向平等、无相、无限靠拢。当然,做起来确实有一定难度,因为凡夫心的力量很大。但不要预存菩萨道很难、成佛很难的心态,这种畏难情绪是发心的极大障碍。
事实上,每种心行力量都是培养起来的。聚沙能够成塔,是因为点滴的积累;愚公能够移山,是因为不懈的努力。其中还有个关键,必须真切认识到菩提心的重要性,认识到这是学佛的唯一出路。否则,不要说救度众生,自顾尚且不暇。基于对自身生命的负责及对众生的慈悲,我们别无选择,唯有全力以赴地做。成就菩提心的先例很多,恒河沙数诸佛是这么走过来的,历代祖师大德也是这么走过来的。
@@ -0,0 +1,537 @@
Understanding Bodhicitta
------A lecture series delivered in September 2003 at the Jiechuang Buddhist Research Institute
In September 2003, Venerable Jiqun delivered a lecture series titled *Understanding Bodhicitta* to students at the Jiechuang Buddhist Research Institute. Over the course of a week, the Venerable started from "the aspirations of ordinary people" and progressed layer by layer, giving a detailed exposition of how to generate bodhicitta correctly, the extraordinary nature of bodhicitta, the causes and conditions for its arising, and its characteristics. Drawing on the view of the Huayan school, integrating Yogācāra and Madhyamaka thought, and referencing the teachings on bodhicitta passed down by great masters through the ages, as well as his own practice experience, the Venerable offered a comprehensive summary and interpretation of the bodhicitta teachings---transforming them from mere slogans into a path that moves from theory to practice.
The two characters *faxin* (aspiration) are surely familiar to us all. We often hear elders urging us to generate aspiration, and many of us encourage each other with the same phrase. But if we look closely, how many people truly grasp its meaning? And how many can generate aspiration properly, accurately, and to a high standard? In fact, very few can. Thus, in many cases, "aspiration" seems to have become an empty slogan.
Nearly all the important Mahayana scriptures contain instructions on generating bodhicitta. The *Avatamsaka Sutra* states, "To forget bodhicitta while cultivating wholesome roots---this is the work of Māra." This passage was cited by Master Xing'an in his *Exhortation to Generate Bodhicitta*, and it has been widely circulated in Chinese Buddhism, deeply thought-provoking. Without bodhicitta, all our efforts in practice become causes for samsara. The *Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sutra* says, "How does a bodhisattva-mahāsattva ride the Great Vehicle for the benefit and happiness of all sentient beings? Pūrṇamaitrāyaṇīputra replied: Śāriputra! When a bodhisattva-mahāsattva cultivates the perfection of wisdom, he does so with a mind oriented toward omniscience, with great compassion as the foremost, using non-attainment as skillful means." The mind oriented toward omniscience is bodhicitta. Venerable Yinshun cited this passage in *The Three Essentials of Buddhist Study* and proposed the three key principles of Mahayana Buddhism: bodhicitta, great compassion, and the view of emptiness, fully demonstrating bodhicitta's importance in the bodhisattva path.
In the *Lamrim*, the essentials of Dharma practice are summarized as the three principal paths: renunciation, bodhicitta, and the view of emptiness. I find this summary incisive. Generating renunciation is not only for personal liberation; it also serves as the foundation for bodhicitta to arise. Because Mahayana Buddhism is grounded in bodhicitta, and buddhahood is the perfect fulfillment of bodhicitta, the view of emptiness also serves bodhicitta. From the arising of bodhicitta to its fulfillment, the guidance of the view of emptiness is indispensable. Without the view of emptiness, it is difficult even to free ourselves from the ordinary mind, let alone achieve unsurpassed enlightenment.
Chinese Buddhism belongs to the Mahayana, yet in the course of its dissemination in China, it has not fully embodied the Mahayana spirit. Although the patriarchs of the various Chinese schools all left specialized discussions on bodhicitta when founding their traditions, these failed to draw the attention of later generations. After the Tang and Song dynasties, only the Chan and Pure Land schools retained wide influence. Yet practitioners of Chan and Pure Land often display a strong world-renouncing tone. Chan practitioners seek nothing more than liberation from birth and death, and Pure Land practitioners aspire to rebirth in the Western Paradise---also liberation from birth and death. The problem, moreover, is that they are essentially focused on personal liberation. To practice solely for personal liberation is clearly not the Mahayana aspiration.
Why did Mahayana Buddhism, so full of the spirit of active engagement with the world, evolve into such a pronounced world-renouncing tone after coming to China? The root cause lies in the neglect of bodhicitta---in practice, people unconsciously drifted toward personal liberation as the main focus.
What distinguishes the Mahayana from the Hinayana? Many people tend to differentiate them doctrinally, as if studying Mahayana teachings makes one a bodhisattva practitioner while studying Hinayana teachings makes one a śrāvaka practitioner. This is not the case. The key distinction between Mahayana and Hinayana lies in one's aspiration and the practice of that aspiration. If we generate bodhicitta and uphold the five precepts, then those five precepts are the five precepts of the Mahayana, an integral part of the bodhisattva path. If we generate renunciation only for personal liberation, then even if we study the most perfect and sudden teaching of the *Avatamsaka Sutra*, we still do not qualify as true Mahayana disciples.
In today's Buddhist community, many people lack understanding of what generating bodhicitta truly entails. They do not know what genuine aspiration is, how to generate it properly, what to do after generating it properly, or how to sustain and steadily develop it. Most remain unclear about this entire range of questions, and naturally, bodhicitta can never arise.
To resolve these issues, let us begin with the aspirations of ordinary people.
I. The Aspirations of Ordinary People
The "ordinary people" I refer to here are those in society who have not studied the Buddhadharma. Even without realizing it, they too are generating aspirations. Every day they have countless thoughts: they want fine clothes and rich food, wealth flowing in endlessly, and a smooth political career. Even worse, some think of cheating, swindling, and profiting at others' expense. In fact, none of these thoughts arise out of nowhere; each has its own psychological basis. That basis may be greed, hatred, arrogance, jealousy, or even wrong views and perverse knowledge. This psychological basis then gives rise to corresponding actions.
> 1. The Formation of the Ordinary Mind
Every action, in the process of being carried out, produces an objective result on the one hand---starting a company to make money, building a successful enterprise through decades of effort. On the other hand, that action also shapes our ordinary mind. If the psychological basis for starting the company was greed, then during the course of running it, attachment to the company will increase accordingly, and in the end, the company becomes a significant part of our life.
In society, many young people become frantic over romantic relationships, even to the point of threatening suicide. They did not reach this extreme from the very start---it is not as if they became inseparable the moment they met. It is through the process of being in love that mutual attachment grows deeper and deeper, until it reaches an incomparable intensity, until they feel that losing the other person means losing their entire emotional foundation.
This is precisely how the ordinary mind is continually nourished. Understood through Yogācāra principles, this is "seeds giving rise to manifest activity, manifest activity perfuming seeds." These two phrases, though simple, fully reveal the dynamics of mental functioning. "Seeds giving rise to manifest activity" is a process of repetition---but not simple repetition. The repetition of mental states changes over time, incorporating personal experience and thought, ultimately forming various mental patterns such as greed, hatred, arrogance, and jealousy. Especially in modern society, where moral standards are in decline and hearts stray from the old ways, running a business means facing many tests---one might even say traps everywhere---so that people are unconsciously carried away by various temptations. In the end, though the enterprise may succeed, the inner world is defiled beyond recognition.
Understood in this sense, aspiration means that through our external thoughts and actions, we ultimately give rise to and solidify a certain psychological state. Therefore, whenever we do something, we must consider not only the objective outcome but also what kind of mind it is shaping. A business is short-lived, but the force of the ordinary mind affects not only this life but also the future.
Worldly people, taking the ordinary mind as their foundation, produce all kinds of thoughts and actions, thereby shaping ordinary qualities. What are ordinary qualities? Fundamentally, they are the two graspings of self and phenomena, and the afflictions of greed, hatred, and ignorance. Of course, each person's attachments have different orientations, giving rise to different personality traits. The strength of the ordinary mind depends on how much we cultivate it. Someone habitually greedy is constantly reinforcing their greed; someone habitually hateful is constantly reinforcing their hatred. We can easily observe these phenomena in daily life. If we do not reflect and put a stop to it, greed and hatred will seek out targets at every moment and act. Over time, they become overwhelmingly powerful.
The mind grows through repetition; each repetition strengthens it. Therefore, we must examine our every word and deed, even every thought that arises, and make timely adjustments.
> 2. Cultivating Wholesome Mental Patterns
Acquiring any skill also requires constant repetition. Take learning a sport, for example: we must practice repeatedly to form the correct posture. Some movements may appear simple, but it is not easy to learn them correctly. Even after learning them, we still need considerable time for consolidation. This is because we have usually already formed certain habitual postures; the moment we relax, we immediately revert to our old habits. Only when we are especially mindful do we assume the correct posture.
In fact, behavioral habits reflect mental habits---the two are one. But bringing mental patterns into concrete behavior does require training. This training may take hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands of repetitions, always adjusting our views and behavior to the correct state, then repeating it. When this repetition stabilizes in the mind, that is concentration. In fact, concentration is nothing mysterious---stable continuity is concentration. Once correct physical and mental behavior becomes stable, it unleashes tremendous energy. Otherwise, its power is very weak.
Mindfulness likewise requires training. This is why in Buddha-name recitation, we must constantly recollect the name of Amitābha Buddha, repeating the name over and over, again and again. So what is the key to repetition? Having right view as our guide. Otherwise, repetitive training may solidify mistaken views and behaviors into stubborn bad habits.
Right view guides us in adjusting body and mind, helping us determine: this state should be abandoned, that state should be abandoned. Through constant relinquishment, we adjust the mind until it is balanced, leaning neither to one side nor the other. Right view also tells us: with what attitude should we approach this state, and into what state might we fall otherwise, and so on. This is precisely why scriptural study matters---because the teachings help us establish right view. But in studying the teachings, we must find our footing, and that footing is in our own minds. Therefore, the focus of Dharma study is the mind, not the books.
Correct aspiration is vitally important. The foundation of an ordinary person's aspiration is mistaken, so what gets trained in the end is the ordinary mind---greed, hatred---not the awakened mind, not loving-kindness and compassion. Conversely, if we could apply the same energy we use to train the ordinary mind to training the qualities of buddhas and bodhisattvas, to training the awakened mind, we would achieve results very quickly---perhaps using less than one percent of the effort. The key issue is that we do not understand what the awakened mind is, still less how to train it. If we find the right method, awakening is not remote. Looking through the biographies of past masters, many attained sudden awakening with a single pointer from a virtuous teacher. This illustrates from one angle that awakening is not something unattainable. While the Buddha was alive, many disciples, upon hearing his teachings, gained the pure Dharma eye and realized the noble path and its fruits there and then. If it were so difficult, instantaneous attainment would be impossible. So practice must have a simple side---the key lies in finding the right method and the right starting point.
II. Pitfalls in Practitioners' Aspiration
Because ordinary people act from the ordinary mind, they cultivate the ordinary mind. So, is the aspiration of Buddhist practitioners necessarily correct? Not entirely. Many practitioners' aspiration has not broken free from their ingrained mental habits, nor does it count as correct aspiration.
> 1. Aspiration Based on Some Form of Attachment
There are two common pitfalls in practitioners' aspiration. The first is being wrong from the start---coming to the Dharma with some form of attachment. If we delve into this, perhaps ninety percent of people begin from this starting point.
Some people are drawn by the serene atmosphere of a monastery. After entering the monastery, they feel very peaceful, so they come to study Buddhism, imagining that living in the monastery and enjoying a leisurely life is the ultimate human ideal. In fact, they are merely attached to the ambiance of a place beyond the world. Some are moved by the pure chanting and the monks' recitations; after taking up Buddhism, they chant along every day, believing this to be the best practice, when actually they are merely attached to the chanting and the sound. Some enjoy Buddhism's profound philosophy, feeling that Buddhist studies give intellectual depth. Still others admire Buddhism's splendid art, believing the halls of Buddhist art hold rich treasures---and so on. If we come to Buddhism through attachment to some external object, then in the course of practice, that attachment will often increase as well.
If we treat Buddhism merely as an academic subject to research, then ultimately writing papers and producing results becomes the goal. Once we have achievements, monographs, and academic titles, we may feel that the task of studying Buddhism is completely finished and life's problems entirely resolved. There are also many who treat Buddhism as pure philosophy to contemplate, whose interest in philosophical theory far exceeds their concern for resolving life's problems. The scholars of the China Institute of Inner Learning during the Republican era largely fell into philosophical research rather than being grounded in care for life itself. Some people even come to Buddhism seeking material benefits, treating the monastery as a place to make a living---an even more mistaken aspiration.
When we analyze carefully, the vast majority of people enter the Buddha's gate through causes and conditions like these. Those who truly awaken to the impermanence of life, who seek a way out for their existence, who seek liberation from birth and death, who aspire to become buddhas and patriarchs, who study Buddhism to benefit all sentient beings---these are exceedingly rare. If, after generating some aspiration, we continue to fixate on external phenomena without elevating our aim, what we ultimately cultivate is likely attachment and the two kinds of grasping---to self and phenomena. This is the first common pitfall in aspiration.
Of course, entering through attachment is not absolutely impermissible. The *Vimalakīrti Sutra* says, "First entice them with desire, then guide them into the Buddha's wisdom." That is, first use some skillful means to spark an interest in the Dharma, then gradually lead the person forward. For example, some centers in Australia offer free vegetarian meals. Many people initially come to the monastery not from an interest in Buddhism but for the free food. But as they visit more often, they gradually develop an affinity for Buddhism; then they listen to a few talks, read some Buddhist books, and their understanding deepens, eventually arriving at correct aspiration. So if we do not remain stuck in attachment but can establish right view through listening and reflecting on the teachings, and with right view as our guide, "diligently cultivate precepts, concentration, and wisdom, and extinguish greed, hatred, and ignorance"---then even if we began from attachment, we can ultimately let go of that attachment and still achieve liberation.
> 2. Falling into the Ordinary Mind in the Course of Practice
The second pitfall begins with correct aspiration---the person genuinely studies Buddhism to pursue liberation or attain buddhahood. But can this aspiration be sustained? Can it maintain its purity forever?
We know that aspiration is only a beginning, merely the power of a single thought. This newly arisen right thought is like an infant, its strength very feeble. By contrast, the power of the ordinary mind is immense, because it originates in the beginningless torrent of existence, and its force is often stronger than we imagine. Only when we generate intense renunciation and bodhicitta does the ordinary mind temporarily retreat. Just as when a cat appears, the mouse tactfully hides in its hole.
But the mind does not always remain in such a state, especially when we are engaged in activities---managing a practice center, administering a monastery, which inevitably involves navigating complex social relationships; traveling to various places to teach the Dharma, giving lectures, which inevitably involves dealing with all kinds of followers. In these processes, we often forget our original aspiration, even treating the achievements of our work as the goal of practice. In fact, when we act from renunciation or bodhicitta, the ultimate fruit we aim to accomplish is liberation, unsurpassed enlightenment---the work itself is merely a byproduct.
Regrettably, most people, in the course of working, unconsciously neglect their original intention and deviate from their initial purpose. Especially once the work reaches a certain scale, we may even be like worldly people, wanting the enterprise to grow bigger and bigger, wanting it to surpass others, forgetting the mindset with which a practitioner should approach their work. And so, all the ordinary mind returns. As the work expands, attachment to it grows in direct proportion. The larger the enterprise becomes, the stronger the clinging to it grows. Although what we are engaged in is Buddhist work, the dynamics of mental functioning are the same as in any worldly undertaking.
Whether it is attachment to Buddhist work or attachment to worldly wealth, there is no essential difference between the two kinds of greed. Of course, propagating the Dharma or supporting a center benefits many people, and the merit thus created is utterly different in its karmic results from attachment to worldly fame and gain. But we must recognize that in terms of the attachment they produce in the mind, the two are not the slightest bit different. Just as in our eyes, whether gold dust or sand is placed there, both are equally harmful.
Many people engaged in activities---supporting the Dharma, teaching the Dharma, even practicing---do not truly understand what mindset they should bring to their work, so in the process of aspiration they unconsciously fall into the ordinary mind. This situation is quite common in Buddhist circles: while objectively accomplishing Buddhist work, subjectively they also develop a classic ordinary mind. Once the work reaches a substantial scale, it may even give rise to factionalism, departmentalism, and sectarian views. In truth, these are all manifestations of self-grasping. Because self-grasping grows alongside the work, and in the end it has nothing to do with genuine practice. On the surface, the work looks brilliant, with vast influence in spreading the Dharma, but self-grasping and attachment are increasing day by day.
Understanding this principle is extremely important. Over ninety-five percent of people may never have noticed this point, which is why so many have fallen into the trap one after another. I myself only discovered this principle recently, while reflecting on the question of bodhicitta. Though the principle is simple, its significance is immense. For you students in particular, it is not too late to grasp this now. If we can generate intense bodhicitta and properly adjust our mental patterns, we will not be carried away by our work in the course of doing it.
Some might say: since doing things causes so many problems, wouldn't it be better to remain detached and keep a safe distance? But then we could not benefit all sentient beings, nor could we attain buddhahood. We know that bodhicitta practice is profoundly active. If we do nothing, bodhicitta can never be mobilized, and the qualities of buddhas and bodhisattvas can never be developed. Therefore, we must cultivate altruistic action to accumulate the provisions for buddhahood. The key is to engage in work with correct aspiration and to sustain that aspiration throughout. Only in this way can we benefit sentient beings while at the same time developing buddha- and bodhisattva-like qualities within ourselves.
We should consider ourselves fortunate to learn about these pitfalls in aspiration early in our Buddhist study. Of course, merely knowing is far from enough. If we do not grasp the essentials of working with the mind and put them into practice, even knowing will be useless, because the power of the ordinary mind is simply too great. We must therefore combine the profound methods of mind-training from the Buddhadharma and apply ourselves diligently to mental cultivation. Otherwise, understanding the principle won't help.
The self is wily and full of tricks. It will seek out all kinds of excuses to mobilize the ordinary mind. Our inner world has countless channels. Sometimes we clearly switch on one channel, only to have a channel with a stronger signal seize control. We encounter similar phenomena when watching television. The self not only has a powerful signal but is always watching for an opportunity to act. Deep within us, each mental factor is like a channel of the mind---some weaker, some stronger. Whichever mental factor is strongest will assert itself and dominate us. The most dangerous of these is self-grasping, for it has been formed since beginningless time. Therefore, the greatest enemy in practice is self-grasping; once we thoroughly destroy self-grasping, all other afflictions will be resolved with ease.
How to avoid falling into the ordinary mind during the process of generating aspiration---this is an extremely crucial aspect of practice, and the essentials of aspiration lie within it. On close analysis, our inner world is highly complex. Even when doing good, it is difficult to guarantee a pure altruistic intention. Of course, altruism should be present, but self-grasping is certainly there too, and greed and judgmental attitudes are hard to avoid. We make distinctions about whom we should benefit and whom we should not, drawing many boundaries. So we can see that even when doing good, the ordinary mind starts up right alongside. If we are not vigilant, the ordinary mind will gradually take the dominant position and ultimately replace the original altruistic intention, and then what we cultivate can only be the ordinary mind. Only by generating a purely altruistic intention can we possibly develop the compassionate qualities of buddhas and bodhisattvas.
The *Diamond Sutra* and the *Practices and Vows of Samantabhadra* tell us that genuine aspiration should possess the characteristics of awakening, altruism, boundlessness, and non-attainment. We must use these as our standard, constantly examining and adjusting our mental patterns. First we need to recognize the pitfalls in aspiration; only then can we accurately generate bodhicitta and further grasp the essentials of practice. Although the Buddhadharma has different systems---in the Mahayana, for instance, there are Yogācāra, Huayan, the Lotus, Nirvāṇa, and Madhyamaka-Prajñā---when we find their core, we discover that all scriptures and treatises are helping us on different levels. Yogācāra's analysis of the mind and its exposition of the dynamics of mental functioning are of great help in understanding aspiration. The ultimate truth of the Buddhadharma is reached by different paths that converge at the same destination; though the methods of entry and realization differ, they are interconnected at the root.
III. How to Generate Correct Aspiration
The entire Tripiṭaka, all twelve divisions of the canon, revolve around the nature of mind, helping us understand it. If we do not understand our own mind, and do not understand its many pitfalls, we will inevitably be unable to generate correct aspiration.
Although Buddhism also cares about the world, the ultimate purpose of this concern is still to resolve the problem of mind. Many of our afflictions arise from mistaken understanding of the world. Are the world and our mind one or two? In most people's view, mind is mind and the world is the world---the two seem to have little to do with each other. Because we regard mind and world as two, the mind falls into dualistic grasping.
In practice, there are two greatest enemies: the grasper and the grasped. Yogācāra explains the two graspings very clearly for us: the imagined nature is the point at which life falls from boundlessness into limitation. When we transcend the imagined nature, we can, right in the midst of dependently arisen phenomena, realize emptiness. It is because of this grasping that the world of truth becomes the world of ordinary beings. If we realize the principle that "everything is created by the mind alone," we can, through this understanding, realize emptiness---because all phenomena are manifestations of mind and are one with the mind. This is a fundamental principle we must understand when studying Yogācāra.
Throughout history, religions have emerged one after another. Even during the Buddha's lifetime, there were ninety-six kinds of non-Buddhist paths. Why can these other religions not open great wisdom and realize emptiness? The reason lies in cognitive error: they take what is not truth, not emptiness, as the true nature of all phenomena. They remain, to varying degrees, within the two graspings of self and phenomena, attached to some notion of self or some notion of phenomena, and what they see is not the original face of things.
A correct understanding of the nature of mind is vitally important for practice. Only when we reach this level of understanding can we clearly know where aspiration should begin. Correct aspiration consists primarily of two kinds: renunciation and bodhicitta.
> 1. Renunciation
What is renunciation? When many people resolve to leave the household life, they urgently want to depart from home---so urgently they cannot wait a single day. That state of mind at that moment is renunciation. When a worldly marriage dissolves and both parties are desperate to part, intent on resolving it as quickly as possible; or when we have grown weary of staying somewhere and don't want to see it for another moment, where staying an extra day feels like torment---that intense desire to separate or leave is also renunciation. As to where one goes after leaving, that is another matter; here we are merely describing the mental state of longing for release.
Let us reflect: when we study Buddhism, leave home, and pursue liberation, do we always maintain this attitude of renunciation? Many people may have it right after leaving home, but as time passes, the monastic life gradually turns into just another lifestyle, merely a change of setting for daily living. This is not surprising. Psychologically speaking, human beings have a tendency toward habitual numbness. Once we become familiar with a certain state, we gradually lose our sensitivity to it.
When we normally see a dead person, especially a close relative who has passed away, we are immediately alerted to the reality of death. But for mortuary workers, putting a body into the cremator is probably little different from tending a furnace. Most people would scarcely dare to do such work---to push someone once alive into the flames and reduce them to ashes is truly a difficult act. Yet these workers face so many cold, stiff bodies every day that they no longer feel any fear or alertness toward death. Similarly, every patient takes their own illness very seriously, but a doctor treats batch after batch of patients every day. No matter how serious a patient considers their illness, in the doctor's eyes it is merely one case among thousands and does not elicit the same level of concern. These are all examples of habitual numbness.
The same applies to leaving the household life for many people. After a long time, it is easy to regard the monastery simply as an environment for daily living, concerned only with creating a comfortable atmosphere for getting through the days. That is why the Buddha exhorted monks to constantly recollect that life is but a breath, that if the next breath does not come, it is already the next life. Only thus can we remain alert to death and no longer cling to an easy, comfortable life.
If we truly realize how urgent impermanence is, that it is right before our eyes, would we still dare to be scattered, indulge in fantasies, or chase after fame and gain? Would we have time to busy ourselves with external matters? We would then spontaneously practice with the same urgency "as if our head were on fire," maintaining a sense of pressing need in our practice, not daring to relax in the slightest. If our mind is constantly in a state of high alert, it is very easy to connect with the practice.
Generating renunciation is the foundation of monastic practice. So what exactly are we renouncing? We renounce samsara, the world, the five desires and six sense objects. True renunciation includes two dimensions: external renunciation and internal renunciation. The external aspect means the five desires and six sense objects; the internal aspect means our attachment to those objects and the ordinary mind that arises from that attachment. Therefore, what we need to renounce is not only the environment but even more so our own ordinary mind. In fact, the purpose of renouncing the environment is precisely to renounce our attachment to it and the ordinary mind that attachment generates. Only by freeing ourselves from the ordinary mind can we realize emptiness and be liberated from afflictions.
To renounce the ordinary mind, we must first not have the slightest attachment to the world---this is the key. The Āgama teachings tell us that contemplation of suffering should be the foremost principle in our understanding. Suffering is the foundation for Buddhist world-transcending liberation. Contemplating life as suffering, and then realizing impermanence, emptiness, and selflessness---these are the fundamental insights that give rise to renunciation.
In terms of conduct, we should practice according to precepts, concentration, and wisdom. Since beginningless time, we have developed numerous habitual tendencies---greed, hatred, ignorance, and so on. Each afflictive tendency seeks to dominate us. We must use the power of precepts to block them, denying the afflictions any opportunity. Concentration means anchoring the mind on a chosen object---for example, practicing breath-counting meditation or contemplation of impurity, settling the mind on the breath or the visualization of impurity so that discursive thoughts cease their activity. Then we cultivate contemplation of impermanence and selflessness to bring forth flawless wisdom, thoroughly uprooting afflictions and attachments.
Thus, after generating renunciation, we must know how to sustain it and continuously strengthen it until final attainment. Otherwise, even if we generate renunciation, it will soon be replaced by the ordinary mind. When we generate intense renunciation, the ordinary mind temporarily retreats. But the moment we relax slightly, it immediately surges back. I have deeply realized that practice must be as vigorous as a warrior's effort; otherwise, making a significant breakthrough is very difficult. That said, the courage in working with the mind does not mean applying extremely forceful attention. Although some deliberate attention is needed at the start, the more important point is to never relax. If we push too hard for extended periods, we not only become exhausted but also fall into the trap of forced attention. So the key is knowing how to work with the mind; otherwise, even vigorous effort will go wrong---as the saying goes, haste makes waste.
The ultimate goal of generating renunciation is liberation from birth and death. In modern society, practice is indeed more difficult than in the past, because society offers far too many temptations, and monastics have far too many tasks to attend to. For most people, the early stages of practice are easily affected by the environment, so the demands on the environment must be very strict. Monastics of the past mostly withdrew to the mountains and forests, living a pure life of practice. Beyond the absolute minimum of food and clothing to sustain the body, they devoted their main energy to realizing the path. By comparison, our practice environment today is far harsher, and cultivating the path of liberation is much more difficult.
For this reason, practice today may require some more intense methods. In other words, methods that take less time but show results quickly, able to cut off the torrent on the spot. Such methods do indeed exist in the Buddhadharma, enabling us to get on the path in a relatively short time. And once on the path, they immediately allow us to abide in a state free from conceptualization, free from fixation, and free from attainment. Today, we must seek out such skillful means for working with the mind; only then can practice be more assured. If we have to sit for ten or twenty years before seeing some progress, as the ancients did, it is very hard for modern people to practice in that way. Without a pure and supportive environment, the small progress we make in practice often cannot withstand the harm caused by external conditions.
Though many people set aside two or more hours each day for Buddha-name recitation, sutra recitation, or meditation, for the remaining dozen or so hours they are still immersed in thoughts of greed, hatred, and ignorance. The mindfulness we cultivate through deliberate attention is still very weak and cannot possibly withstand our beginningless habitual tendencies. This is why, though many people are practicing, their afflictive habits remain exactly as they were.
If our practice is built on the level of the ordinary mind, it is completely normal for such phenomena to occur. Because the mindfulness we are now cultivating is established on the conscious level. To use this to resist the afflictive delusions accumulated since beginningless time---with such unequal strength, how could we possibly win? It is like an infant wrestling a strongman; the outcome is self-evident. Recognizing this law of mental functioning, we can easily understand why so many people's practice fails to achieve the expected results.
> 2. Bodhicitta
Renunciation is only the foundation of practice; we must go further and generate bodhicitta. Renunciation can develop in two directions. One is intense personal renunciation, seeking only nirvāṇic liberation; this belongs to the śrāvaka fixed on tranquillity. The other begins with renunciation and then turns from the small toward the great, generating bodhicitta. Renunciation is the abandonment of worldly attachment, and it is precisely the foundation on which bodhicitta is built. Bodhicitta's features---non-abiding and non-attainment---are aligned with renunciation. The difference between the two lies in whether we can extend what we feel for ourselves to others, making the aspiration to benefit all beings and realize enlightenment together, based on our own wish for liberation.
Bodhicitta has two aspects: broadly benefiting sentient beings, and seeking unsurpassed buddhahood. Is there a sequential order between these two? In the process of aspiration, do we prioritize benefiting sentient beings, or attaining buddhahood? Do we liberate beings in order to become a buddha, or do we become a buddha in order to liberate beings? There are different views on this question.
For most Buddhist practitioners, what probably comes to mind first is "I want to become a buddha," and then, in order to attain buddhahood, to benefit sentient beings. In other words, liberating beings serves "my" attainment of buddhahood. But in the process of benefiting sentient beings, a bodhisattva should not regard themselves as benefactors to beings; rather, they should see beings as benefactors to themselves. This is because only altruistic action enables us to develop the quality of compassion and the provisions for enlightenment. The *Practices and Vows of Samantabhadra* tells us: "All sentient beings are the roots, and all buddhas and bodhisattvas are the flowers and fruits. By benefiting sentient beings with the water of great compassion, we can bring forth the flowers and fruits of buddhas' and bodhisattvas' wisdom." This clearly points out the relationship between buddhas, bodhisattvas, and sentient beings---sentient beings serve as the enhancing condition for developing compassion.
Even if we possess the life qualities of buddhas and bodhisattvas, this seed can only mature through benefiting sentient beings, and through purely altruistic action. Only when our aspiration reaches this level can we perfect the inner quality of compassion. If it is still mixed with the ordinary mind, it can only serve as a prelude to mobilizing compassion and may even "miss by a hair's breadth and go astray by a thousand miles." At the same time, we must accumulate our aspiration to a certain degree before bodhicitta can be fully activated. This training may require hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, or even millions of repetitions. We must think this way and act this way every day, strengthening it through constant mental simulation and training. Once both the quality and the quantity of our aspiration are sufficient, we will be no different from the buddhas and bodhisattvas.
But if we perpetually maintain this attitude---treating the liberation of beings merely as an expedient for our own attainment of buddhahood---compassion is very difficult to perfect. Because our goal is "I want to become a buddha," and as long as there is this "I," it is hard to guarantee a purely altruistic intention when liberating beings; there may even be suspicion of using beings for our own ends.
Therefore, I think this view has both strengths and weaknesses. The strength is that when we liberate beings, we clearly know why we should benefit them: because "I want to become a buddha," I must act altruistically. The weakness is that we have not genuinely generated unconditional great compassion and the compassion of shared essence toward beings. It is merely like taking medicine because we are sick---treating altruistic action as a means to attain buddhahood. If we remain at this level, the purity of our compassion will inevitably be compromised to varying degrees.
Another view is "for the sake of benefiting beings, may I attain buddhahood." That is to say, practice is not aimed at becoming a buddha but only at better liberating sentient beings. It is like you students coming to the institute for further study: the purpose is not to obtain a diploma but to better teach the Dharma and benefit beings in the future, to shoulder the work of the Tathāgata. If we do everything for the sake of sentient beings, without the slightest admixture of other motives, it is easier to reach the standard of buddhas' and bodhisattvas' aspiration. When we generate aspiration in this way, the qualities of buddhas and bodhisattvas are already taking effect in our life, and right here and now, on some level, we are no different from the buddhas and bodhisattvas. This is what the *Avatamsaka Sutra* means by "the initial generation of bodhicitta is itself perfect enlightenment." In other words, the beginning of practice and the ultimate result are not essentially different.
The *Avatamsaka Sutra*'s chapter on the merit of the initial generation of bodhicitta contains a detailed exposition of this. From it, we can understand that when aspiration is generated properly, its merit is truly beyond imagination. This is because bodhicitta is none other than the mind of buddhahood!
So, how do we generate bodhicitta? Some might find it very abstract, but in fact, there are many concrete methods. What is the content of generating bodhicitta? It is "I want to liberate sentient beings, I want to become a buddha." This mental state of "I want to become a buddha" is actually the same in kind as "I want to eat"---only the object is different. Of course, there are also differences in degree and purity. For example, "I want to eat" can range from optional to urgent to absolutely imperative. In a certain sense, the intention "I want to become a buddha" is similar.
The problem is that when we want to eat, we feel urgent about it; when we want to become a buddha, we feel no such urgency. This is because the aspirations of daily life and the aspiration "I want to become a buddha" are, after all, different. If we want to eat, we can eat immediately. But if we want to become a buddha, how can we achieve that? There seems to be no starting point. Why does this happen? Because we do not truly recognize the meaning of becoming a buddha. Therefore, when generating aspiration, we also need a focal object---namely, the qualities of the Buddha's attainment. The *Avatamsaka Sutra* and other scriptures and treatises contain extensive passages describing the qualities of buddhahood. Only when we recognize the extraordinary value of the Buddha's attainment and understand that the meaning of human life lies in attaining buddhahood can we possibly generate intense bodhicitta.
In my view, the practice methods expounded throughout the Mahayana canon---from the bodhisattvas' vows to the bodhisattva precepts, and the views of Huayan and Prajñā---all revolve around the fulfillment of bodhicitta. Only by making bodhisattva vows, upholding bodhisattva precepts, and walking the bodhisattva path can bodhicitta sprout, blossom, and eventually bear fruit. Thus, bodhicitta is both the point of application in practice and the result we ultimately aim to achieve. If we do not generate bodhicitta, our practice cannot find its footing.
IV. The Extraordinary Nature of Bodhicitta
We have now understood that the correct aspiration in Buddhist practice is generating bodhicitta. Yet in Buddhist circles, many people treat aspiration merely as a slogan without putting it into action. Why is that? I think it must be from a lack of understanding of bodhicitta's importance.
As for myself, in the past my understanding of bodhicitta was also quite superficial. Although I often mentioned aspiration, I was like many others in not truly implementing it in practice. Only after encountering the *Avatamsaka Sutra*'s chapter on the merit of the initial generation of bodhicitta was I deeply shaken by its power. Looking back over what I had studied for many years and delving further into the Mahayana scriptures and treatises, I came to truly appreciate the significance of generating bodhicitta.
> 1. The Extraordinary Merit of Bodhicitta
Like many Mahayana scriptures, the chapter on the merit of the initial generation of bodhicitta uses the method of comparative measurement to expound the merit of generating bodhicitta. The sutra employs eleven analogies: benefiting and gladdening beings, traversing universes with speed, knowing the formation and destruction of eons, knowing diverse inclinations, knowing diverse faculties, knowing diverse desires, knowing skillful means, knowing others' minds, knowing karmic appearances, knowing afflictions, and making offerings to buddhas in every lifetime.
The main speaker in this chapter is Bodhisattva Dharmamati, and the interlocutor is Śakra, Lord of Gods. At the chapter's opening, Śakra asks Bodhisattva Dharmamati: How great is the merit of a bodhisattva's initial generation of bodhicitta? Dharmamati first explains with the analogy of benefiting and gladdening beings. The meaning of the passage is roughly: Suppose there were a person who, with all pleasurable provisions (material goods that bring benefit and happiness to sentient beings), made offerings to as many beings as there are in the worlds of the ten directions, up to ten asaṃkhyeyas in number, for a hundred eons; then taught them to cultivate the ten wholesome paths, continuing this Dharma offering for a thousand eons; then taught them to cultivate the four dhyānas for a hundred thousand eons; then taught them to cultivate the four immeasurables for a hundred million eons; then guided them in cultivating the four formless absorptions for ten billion eons; then guided them in practicing the path of liberation, enabling them to attain the fruit of stream-entry, for a hundred billion eons; then guided them in practice enabling them to attain the fruit of once-return, for ten trillion eons; then guided them in abiding in the practice of the non-returner's fruit, for a hundred million nayutas of eons; then guided them in the practice of the arhat's fruition, for a hundred thousand nayutas of hundred-millions of eons; and then taught them to accomplish the path of the pratyekabuddha.
After this series of analogies, Dharmamati asked Śakra in reply: Son of the Buddha! How great do you think this person's merit is? Śakra answered: This person's merit is truly beyond the imagination of ordinary beings; only a buddha could know it.
Dharmamati continued: Although this person's merit is inconceivable, compared with the merit of a bodhisattva's initial generation of bodhicitta, it does not reach one hundredth, one thousandth, one hundred thousandth, or even one upaniṣat part. In other words, the merit of a bodhisattva's initial generation of bodhicitta surpasses the above merit a hundredfold, a thousandfold, a hundred thousandfold, and an upaniṣat-fold. Upaniṣat is a Sanskrit numeral, the largest unit of quantity.
Dharmamati then proceeded to present ten more analogies in succession, each advancing further than the last, all comparatively measuring the merit of a bodhisattva's initial generation of bodhicitta. In these ten analogies, each subsequent merit surpasses the previous one. Thus, each analogy begins with "Setting aside this analogy," letting go of the former to raise the latter, so as to highlight the extraordinary, inconceivable, and unsurpassed merit of a bodhisattva's initial generation of bodhicitta.
Having learned of the extraordinary merit of the initial generation of bodhicitta, we may feel admiration yet also a touch of doubt: Why does a bodhisattva's initial generation of bodhicitta possess such immense merit? What is it that truly distinguishes it from the aspirations of ordinary beings and those of the two vehicles? In response, Dharmamati further explains: Śakra! When all buddhas first generated bodhicitta, they not only made offerings of all provisions to all beings in the worlds of the ten directions; not only taught beings to cultivate the five precepts and ten wholesome paths, the four dhyānas, the four immeasurables, and the four formless absorptions, helping them attain the fruits of stream-entry, once-return, non-return, arhatship, and the pratyekabuddha path. Bodhisattvas at the initial generation of bodhicitta are not satisfied with this; on this foundation, they further aspire to ensure the lineage of the Tathāgatas never ceases and spreads to all worlds, and they aspire to liberate all sentient beings and guide them to accomplish the Buddha path.
From this we can see the fundamental difference between the initial generation of bodhicitta by bodhisattvas and the aspirations of ordinary beings and the two vehicles: the former engages in vast wholesome deeds with a boundless mind, while the latter is limited. The limitations here involve two aspects. First, the quantity is limited---although the number "ten directions and ten asaṃkhyeyas" is already unimaginably vast, it is, after all, finite. Second, the attainment is limited---whether providing beings with provisions for happiness or guiding them to achieve the four fruits of the śrāvaka or even the pratyekabuddha path, these are all finite, limited fruitions, not the limitless, unsurpassed fruit of buddhahood.
Starting from a limited aspiration, liberating a limited number of beings, and achieving a limited fruition---the merit ultimately accomplished can only be limited. No matter how many finite quantities we add together, the result is only a larger, greater finite quantity; it can never compare with the infinite. By contrast, a bodhisattva's initial generation of bodhicitta takes limitless sentient beings as the object of benefit and the unsurpassed fruit of buddhahood as the goal of attainment.
Some may wonder: Sentient beings are countless as particles of dust---can the buddhas and bodhisattvas ever liberate them all? Throughout vast eons, countless buddhas have already attained buddhahood. If every buddha must liberate all sentient beings before realizing enlightenment, why are there still countless beings drowning in the cycle of birth and death? Beings have not all been liberated, yet buddhas have already attained enlightenment---how is this to be understood?
We must understand that when a bodhisattva aspires to liberate all sentient beings and guide them to accomplish the Buddha path, this does not mean their merit can only be perfected after every last being has become a buddha. If that were the case, probably no one could ever attain buddhahood. Since beings are limitless, and buddhas' and bodhisattvas' appearance in the world to liberate beings requires the convergence of causes and conditions, only when beings' own roots of virtue, merits, and karmic conditions are ripe can the buddhas and bodhisattvas successfully liberate them. Otherwise, even their efforts would be in vain.
If a bodhisattva aspires to liberate all sentient beings and gradually fulfills this aspiration through practice, then when they can generate boundless, impartial compassion toward all beings, they have also perfected the mental patterns and qualities possessed by all buddhas, and at that very moment they are no different from the buddhas. Conversely, if in their mind there remains even a single being they reject, the bodhisattva cannot perfect unsurpassed buddhahood, because their compassion is not yet complete.
The *Practices and Vows of Samantabhadra*, widely circulated in Buddhist circles, is precisely the shortcut to practice that Bodhisattva Samantabhadra has provided us for accomplishing the boundless merit of all buddhas. Its core content is the ten great vows of Samantabhadra: first, to pay homage to all buddhas; second, to praise the Tathāgatas; third, to make abundant offerings; fourth, to repent karmic obstacles; fifth, to rejoice in others' merit; sixth, to request the turning of the Dharma wheel; seventh, to request the buddhas to remain in the world; eighth, to constantly follow the Buddha's teachings; ninth, to accord with all sentient beings; tenth, to dedicate all merit universally. These may seem quite ordinary and are familiar to most Buddhists, yet they have always been honored as the "king of vows." Why is this?
The *Practices and Vows* comes from the *Avatamsaka Sutra*, and its practice is grounded in the Huayan vision. This is shown mainly in the opening and closing statements of each vow. Take "paying homage to all buddhas": it begins, "Throughout the entire Dharma-realm, the realm of empty space, all buddha-lands in the ten directions and three times, as numerous as the finest particles of dust---relying on the power of Samantabhadra's practice and vows, with deep faith and understanding, I behold them as if they were before my very eyes." It concludes, "Only when the realm of empty space is exhausted will my homage be exhausted; but because the realm of empty space is inexhaustible, my homage shall have no end. So too, only when the realm of sentient beings is exhausted, the karma of sentient beings is exhausted, and the afflictions of sentient beings are exhausted will my homage be exhausted; but because the realm of sentient beings, and even their afflictions, are inexhaustible, my homage shall have no end. Thought after thought in continuous succession, without interruption, in action of body, speech, and mind, without weariness."
"Paying homage to all buddhas"---it seems most Buddhists can do this. But when ordinary people do it from a narrow ordinary mind, the content of their homage is also narrow. In Samantabhadra's vast practice and vows, however, the object of homage is all buddhas throughout the entire Dharma-realm, the realm of empty space, in the ten directions and three times. And it is not homage for a day, a year, or even a lifetime, but endlessly into the future, without interruption. Even if oceans dry up and rocks crumble, even if the realm of empty space is exhausted, this practice of homage will continue eternally in accordance with Samantabhadra's practice and vows.
The scope of the other nine vows is exactly the same. From this we can understand why Samantabhadra's practice and vows are honored as the king of vows: the key lies in their grounding in boundlessness---engaging in boundless wholesome deeds with a boundless mind. Paying homage to all buddhas takes all buddhas as its object; liberating sentient beings likewise takes all sentient beings as its object---and both extend into the endless future. The object is boundless, with not a single being excluded; the time is also boundless, with neither a moment of rest nor a day of conclusion.
To generate aspiration and practice based on the Huayan view is to take boundlessness as the starting point. And the word "boundlessness" is precisely the key to understanding why the merit of a bodhisattva's initial generation of bodhicitta is inconceivable. Based on a limited aspiration, no matter how many deeds benefiting beings we perform, the result will ultimately be limited. If we wish to accomplish the boundless merit of buddhahood, it must be built on a boundless aspiration. We know that any number multiplied by infinity must result in infinity. By the same principle, when we cultivate wholesome deeds with a boundless mind, though the deeds themselves are finite, what we obtain is infinite. Therefore, if a bodhisattva at the initial generation of bodhicitta performs deeds benefiting beings with a boundless mind, they can accomplish boundless merit in every moment, perfecting the provisions for the Buddha path.
> 2. Bodhicitta Is the Gateway to the Mahayana
How do we distinguish the Mahayana from the Hinayana? Many people think that those who study Mahayana scriptures are Mahayana practitioners and those who study Hinayana scriptures are Hinayana practitioners, rarely considering the matter from the standpoint of their own aspiration. Chinese Buddhism is Mahayana, and therefore Chinese Buddhists mostly identify as Mahayana practitioners, as if this identity were a matter of course.
What is the Mahayana? In the *Lamrim*, Master Tsongkhapa states: "The Buddha taught the Pāramitāyāna and the Mantrayāna; apart from these two, there is no other Mahayana. Through what gate does one enter these two? It is bodhicitta alone. The moment this arises in one's body and mind, even if no other qualities have arisen, one is established in the Mahayana." Here, bodhicitta is the criterion for determining whether one is truly Mahayana. Only when one has generated bodhicitta is one a Mahayana practitioner. Conversely, even if one realizes emptiness and attains various qualities, one is still a śrāvaka practitioner who can only liberate oneself.
Bodhicitta and the wisdom of emptiness are the two great pillars of Buddhist practice, like the two wings of a bird, neither dispensable. The *Lamrim* states: "This unsurpassed bodhicitta is the uncommon cause, like the seed, among the causes of buddhahood. The wisdom that realizes emptiness is the common cause of the three kinds of enlightenment, like water and fertilizer." This tells us clearly: the wisdom of emptiness is the common cause of buddhahood, while bodhicitta is the uncommon cause. A common cause means that all sages of the three vehicles attain realization through the wisdom of emptiness---it is the mother of the three vehicles' practice. An uncommon cause means that among the three vehicles, only bodhisattva path practice absolutely requires bodhicitta. In other words, only after generating bodhicitta is one a true child of the Buddha, a qualified Mahayana practitioner.
However, in the tradition of Chinese Buddhism, there seems to be greater emphasis on the wisdom of emptiness. Doctrinal school practitioners spend decades of study mainly to gain right view and, based on it, practice calm abiding and insight to realize emptiness. The Chan school places even more emphasis on seeing the nature, regarding this as the fundamental goal, as though seeing the nature encompasses the entirety of practice. Perhaps because of this special emphasis on the wisdom of emptiness, the bodhisattva path of the six perfections and four means of gathering---though emphasized in many Mahayana scriptures---has not drawn widespread attention among the fourfold assembly, and even fewer have put it into genuine practice.
The bodhisattva path is the concrete practice of bodhicitta. In fact, because the foundation on which Mahayana Buddhism is built---bodhicitta---has been neglected, a considerable number of people's practice has already fallen into the Hinayana or even the human and heavenly vehicles. They have neither the compassionate spirit of benefiting the world nor the sense of mission that says, "Who else but me?" Perhaps they have never reflected: As a Mahayana practitioner, what qualities should I truly develop? This widespread problem has caused many people's practice to resemble the transcendent, world-renouncing path of liberation more than the active, altruistic bodhisattva path.
V. Types of Bodhicitta
Bodhicitta is the aspiration to attain buddhahood and the mind that seeks to benefit all sentient beings. The unsurpassed enlightenment of buddhahood is precisely the perfect fulfillment of bodhicitta. The various Mahayana scriptures and treatises classify bodhicitta in different ways.
The *Bodhicaryāvatāra* divides it into aspiring bodhicitta and engaging bodhicitta. The text says: "In brief, bodhicitta should be understood as having two kinds: the aspiring mind for enlightenment and the mind that sets forth toward enlightenment. Just as one knows the difference between wanting to go and actually going, so the wise should understand the sequential distinction between these two."
In the *Āryavācāprakaraṇa-śāstra* and the *Yogācārabhūmi Śāstra*, bodhicitta is divided into conventional aspiration and aspiration that realizes the Dharma-nature (ultimate bodhicitta). The former text states: "This reception and generation of bodhicitta has two kinds: first, conventional generation of bodhicitta; second, generation of bodhicitta through realizing the Dharma-nature."
The *Yogācārabhūmi Śāstra*'s *Viniścaya-saṃgrahaṇī* section enumerates ten kinds, primarily distinguishing between conventional bodhicitta and ultimate bodhicitta: "Conventional reception and generation of bodhicitta, realization of the Dharma-nature as generation of bodhicitta; indeterminate generation, determinate generation; impure generation, pure generation; inferior generation, vigorous generation; unattained-result generation, attained-result generation. Conventional reception and generation of bodhicitta refers to the aspiration of bodhisattvas who have not yet entered the noble bodhisattva's stage of definitive deliverance from birth. Realization of the Dharma-nature as generation of bodhicitta refers to the aspiration of bodhisattvas who have already entered the noble bodhisattva's stage of definitive deliverance from birth."
Consolidating these, we can broadly classify bodhicitta into aspiring bodhicitta, engaging bodhicitta, and ultimate bodhicitta.
> 1. Aspiring Bodhicitta
Aspiring bodhicitta is the power of vows regarding bodhicitta. In Buddhist study, we must first make vows, which is what is usually called setting one's resolve. "Set your aspiration high." The higher the aspiration, the greater the achievement. Generating bodhicitta is not an empty slogan. How can we embody our bodhicitta? The most basic expression is making vows.
The *Yogācārabhūmi Śāstra*'s *Bodhisattva-bhūmi* chapter on generating bodhicitta says: "The initial generation of bodhicitta by bodhisattvas, with regard to all the correct vows of bodhisattvas---this initial correct vow universally encompasses and embraces all other correct vows. Therefore, the generation of bodhicitta has the initial correct vow as its essential nature. Moreover, when bodhisattvas arouse the mind of correct vows and seek enlightenment, they generate such a mind and speak such words: 'May I definitively realize unsurpassed perfect enlightenment, be able to bring about all that is meaningful and beneficial for sentient beings, and ultimately establish them in final nirvāṇa and in the vast wisdom of the Tathāgatas.' Such generation of bodhicitta is defined by seeking unsurpassed enlightenment for oneself and seeking to accomplish what is meaningful and beneficial for sentient beings. Therefore, the generation of bodhicitta has definite seeking as its mode of operation. Further, bodhisattvas take great enlightenment and all that is meaningful and beneficial for sentient beings as their objects, generating aspiration and seeking; it is not objectless. Therefore, the generation of bodhicitta takes great enlightenment and all that is meaningful and beneficial for sentient beings as its focal objects."
This passage covers the essential nature, mode of operation, and objects of bodhicitta. The essential nature refers to the initial correct vow made by the bodhisattva, namely "May I definitively realize unsurpassed perfect enlightenment, be able to bring about all that is meaningful and beneficial for sentient beings, and ultimately establish them in final nirvāṇa." This aspiration to seek unsurpassed enlightenment and benefit all sentient beings is the essential substance of bodhicitta. Aspiring bodhicitta represents the beginning of bodhisattva practice and is the initial stage of cultivating bodhicitta.
Aspiring bodhicitta is a wish. Its mental characteristic is that it takes seeking as its mode of operation, and it takes benefiting all sentient beings and unsurpassed enlightenment as its objects. Seeking is an extremely common mental activity. Every day we live amid all sorts of seeking: seeking delicious food, a luxurious house, a comfortable environment, and so on. Then we work hard to fulfill these various wishes. Buddhist practice also begins with seeking. The difference is that what we now seek is not money and status, clothes and food, but unsurpassed enlightenment and benefiting all sentient beings. The only difference lies in the content of our seeking---from hoping for personal gain, we turn toward hoping to benefit all. This different kind of seeking determines two utterly opposite life directions: one is liberation and buddhahood, the other is continuing samsara. Because bodhicitta takes unsurpassed enlightenment and benefiting all sentient beings as its objects, when we seek these two things and put them into action, we step onto the path to buddhahood.
Therefore, the primary issue after generating bodhicitta is making vows---transforming bodhicitta into a power of resolve that advances tirelessly. The attainment of all buddhas throughout the ten directions and three times is precisely the best model for our practice. Amitābha Buddha, in his causal stage, was the monk Dharmākara. Because he drew near to Lokeśvararāja Buddha and heard the Dharma, he generated the mind of unsurpassed enlightenment, hoping to create a magnificent buddha-land to benefit sentient beings. He then consulted Lokeśvararāja Buddha, who displayed for him twenty-one billion buddha-lands, enabling him to understand the good and evil of the gods and humans in those lands and the coarseness or excellence of those lands. After observing them, Dharmākara spent five eons in contemplation before forming the blueprint for the Land of Ultimate Bliss and the design of the forty-eight vows. Thereupon, Dharmākara made his forty-eight great vows in the presence of Lokeśvararāja Buddha, and thus came into being the Western Land of Ultimate Bliss and the attainment of Amitābha Buddha.
The bodhisattva path has four great pillars: great compassion, great wisdom, great vows, and great action. Their representative figures are, respectively, Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva of Great Compassion, Mañjuśrī Bodhisattva of Great Wisdom, Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva of Great Vows, and Samantabhadra Bodhisattva of Great Action. The *Sutra of the Fundamental Vows of Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva* records: "Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva-Mahāsattva, incalculable eons ago, beyond reckoning, was the son of a great elder. At that time, a buddha appeared in the world named Siṃhavikrīḍitapūrṇavikāsatathāgata. The elder's son, seeing the buddha's magnificent marks, adorned with a thousand blessings, asked that buddha: What practice and vows must one undertake to attain such marks? That buddha replied: To attain this body, one must for a long time deliver and liberate all suffering sentient beings. Mañjuśrī, the elder's son thereupon made this vow: From now until the end of future time, throughout incalculable eons, for the sake of beings suffering for their transgressions in the six realms, I will widely devise skillful means and liberate them all; only then will I myself attain the Buddha path." The beings in the evil destinies are immeasurable and inexhaustible, yet Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva was utterly fearless, boldly taking responsibility, willing to liberate them all before realizing enlightenment. What a deeply moving and admirable power of vows this is. Because Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva made such a great vow in the presence of Siṃhavikrīḍita Tathāgata, he has passed through hundreds of thousands of myriads of hundred-millions of nayutas of eons and still appears in the form of a bodhisattva, extensively liberating sentient beings.
Moreover, the familiar figures of Bhaiṣajyaguru, the Medicine Master Tathāgata of the East, Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva, Mañjuśrī Bodhisattva, and Samantabhadra Bodhisattva all made vast vows during their causal stages. These vows share a common feature: benefiting all sentient beings. For ordinary people, life is always about pursuing personal interests---what I want to achieve, what I want to obtain. But the power of the buddhas' and bodhisattvas' vows centers on altruism; every vow starts from benefiting sentient beings. Whether Amitābha Buddha's forty-eight vows, Bhaiṣajyaguru Tathāgata's twelve great vows, or Samantabhadra's ten great vows---there is not a single exception.
The four great vows we often recite are a high-level summation of the bodhisattvas' power of vows and can be said to be the universal vows of bodhisattva practitioners. "Sentient beings are boundless, I vow to liberate them all; afflictions are endless, I vow to cut them all off; Dharma gates are countless, I vow to study them all; the Buddha path is unsurpassed, I vow to achieve it." For the boundless multitudes of sentient beings, we vow to deliver them; for the afflictions accumulated since beginningless time, we resolve to eliminate them; for the Dharma gates revealed by all buddhas, we commit to diligent study; for the unsurpassed fruit of buddhahood, we strive to attain it. All these aspirations belong to aspiring bodhicitta. What vast compassion and majestic vows these are.
Some may think: that is the realm of the buddhas and bodhisattvas---how could ordinary beings like us ever aspire to such heights? We should know that when the buddhas first generated bodhicitta, they too had not yet attained it; they were ordinary beings just like us. After making their vows, they did not instantly become buddhas and bodhisattvas either; rather, they practiced through long eons, doing what is difficult to do, traveling what is difficult to travel, and only then did they perfect enlightenment. If they had never taken that first step, how could they have achieved unsurpassed enlightenment? And if we keep delaying that first step, we too will forever remain in the position of ordinary beings.
Studying Buddhism, ultimately, is studying what the Buddha did. The practice of all buddhas and bodhisattvas began with making vows, and we should follow their example, taking the seeking of unsurpassed enlightenment and the benefiting of sentient beings as our life's purpose. Whether we can earnestly give rise to this extraordinary aspiration depends on the depth of our understanding. If our understanding is only superficial, we will naturally be unable to generate a sincere and earnest mind. Only when we deeply realize that this is the one and only way out for life can we generate intense seeking.
But making vows is only the beginning of practice. If after generating them we no longer recollect or consolidate them, this single thought of aspiration may soon weaken or even disappear. This is because making vows merely plants a seed of bodhicitta in our life. Compared with the ordinary mind formed through endless births and deaths, its power is utterly negligible. How can we make this seed grow strong? The methods for cultivating bodhicitta found in the Mahayana scriptures and treatises are well worth our study.
Generating bodhicitta is the foremost matter in practice. Therefore, after generating aspiration, we should confirm it through a solemn ceremony of reception with vows, formalizing this aspirational intention. The practitioner, kneeling on the right knee before the ācārya with palms joined, generates this thought and speaks: "Ācārya, please bear witness. I, [name], in this life and in future lives, with all roots of virtue of generosity, discipline, and cultivation, whether done by myself, caused to be done by others, or rejoiced in when seen done by others---with these roots of virtue, just as all past Tathāgatas, Arhats, Perfectly Enlightened Ones, and the great bodhisattvas dwelling on the stages generated bodhicitta for unsurpassed perfect enlightenment, so too do I, [name], from now until enlightenment, generate bodhicitta for unsurpassed, vast, perfect enlightenment. For all beings not yet liberated, may they be liberated; for all not yet freed, may they be freed; for all not yet emerged from suffering, may they emerge; for all not yet fully entered nirvāṇa, may they fully enter nirvāṇa." This is spoken three times.
After receiving bodhicitta, to ensure the vow once generated never retreats, we should recite day and night, three times each, three repetitions each time: "In the Buddha, Dharma, and Noble Sangha, I take refuge until enlightenment. By the merits of my practice, may I attain buddhahood for the benefit of all." Through the repeated cultivation of receiving and reciting, bodhicitta will implant firm seeds in our life. The more devout the recipient and the more solemn the atmosphere of reception, the stronger the seeds thus implanted. Mental patterns need conditions to nourish them. Constant grasping at self causes self-grasping to grow thought by thought. By the same principle, constantly recollecting the extraordinary nature of bodhicitta is like watering the seeds we have planted, causing the power of aspiration to grow day by day.
We must be clear: the mode of generating bodhicitta is seeking, and its objects are unsurpassed enlightenment and benefiting all sentient beings. If we take wealth, beauty, fame, food, or sleep as our seeking and our objects, we fall into the ordinary mind. If we only want to benefit a few beings or our own family and friends, we are also far removed from bodhicitta. Therefore, we must constantly remind ourselves to take the seeking of unsurpassed enlightenment and benefiting all sentient beings as the sole purpose of life.
> 2. Engaging Bodhicitta
Engaging bodhicitta means transforming vows into action. Once we have the aspiration to benefit others, we need to implement it in conduct. The entire bodhisattva path falls within the scope of engaging bodhicitta, its main content being the six perfections and the four means of gathering. The six perfections are generosity, discipline, patience, diligence, meditation, and wisdom. Some scriptures also speak of ten perfections, adding skillful means, vows, power, and knowledge to the six. The four means of gathering are generosity, kind speech, beneficial action, and sharing the work.
Judging by their names, the bodhisattva practices do not seem particularly unusual. These same elements appear in the human and heavenly vehicles and in the path of liberation. So what makes the six perfections and four means of gathering on the bodhisattva path distinctive? On this question, the *Madhyānta-vibhāga*'s chapter on the unsurpassed vehicle proposes twelve kinds of supremacy to demonstrate the extraordinary nature of the six perfections as practiced by Mahayana practitioners.
The twelve supremacies are: Bodhisattvas cultivating the six perfections never take delight in worldly glory, wealth, or honor; their aspiration is vast (supremacy of vastness). They cultivate them over countless eons (supremacy of duration). They do so for the universal benefit and happiness of all sentient beings (supremacy of basis). They dedicate them to unsurpassed perfect enlightenment (supremacy of inexhaustibility). They realize the equality of self and other (supremacy of uninterruptedness). Toward all the wholesome practices of all sentient beings, they deeply rejoice (supremacy of ease). They rely on the Gagana-gañja and other samādhis (supremacy of mastery). They are embraced by non-conceptual wisdom (supremacy of being sustained). They are initiated at the stage of superior patience on the path of conviction (supremacy of initiation). At the stage of great joy, ultimate bodhicitta is realized and flawless practice is initiated (supremacy of attainment). At the eighth stage (supremacy of outflow) and up to the stage of buddhahood (supremacy of culmination).
Regarding bodhisattva path practice, the foundational text of the Yogācāra school, the *Yogācārabhūmi Śāstra*'s *Bodhisattva-bhūmi*, elaborates extensively and meticulously on the differences in cultivating the six perfections and four means of gathering through the chapters on generosity, discipline, patience, diligence, meditation, wisdom, and the means of gathering. Among these, the "chapter on discipline" is the well-known *Yogācāra Bodhisattva Precepts*, separately translated by Xuanzang and widely circulated in Buddhist circles.
The *Yogācāra Bodhisattva Precepts* consists of three parts: the precepts of restraint, the precepts of cultivating wholesome dharmas, and the precepts of benefiting sentient beings. The precepts of restraint are the individual liberation precepts for the seven assemblies received by bodhisattvas, emphasizing the cessation of evil---stopping all evil, with no evil not stopped. The precepts of cultivating wholesome dharmas refer to wholesome dharmas of body, speech, and mind, as well as the three wisdoms of listening, reflection, and cultivation, focusing on cultivating goodness---cultivating all goodness, with no goodness not cultivated. The precepts of benefiting sentient beings refer to all altruistic practices of bodhisattvas, such as the four immeasurables of loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity.
The complete content of the *Yogācāra Bodhisattva Precepts* comprises four root precepts and forty-three secondary precepts. These rules are formulated based on the six perfections and four means of gathering, as well as the obstacles likely to arise in benefiting others, to ensure the stability and continuity of altruistic practice. That is to say, not only are precepts established for stopping evil, but doing good is also codified as precept rules, so that practitioners know "what I must do for the benefit of sentient beings, and how I should do it." Otherwise, the ordinary mind will find countless excuses for laziness. Especially when altruism temporarily conflicts with personal interests, self-grasping will instinctively resist benefiting others. This requires some binding rules that leave no room for avoidance.
Among these, seven rules are established based on obstacles to the perfection of generosity, seven for obstacles to discipline, four for obstacles to patience, three for obstacles to diligence, three for obstacles to meditation, eight for obstacles to wisdom, and eleven for obstacles to the four means of gathering. If the six perfections lean more toward the perfection of self-benefit, the four means of gathering lean more toward the practice of benefiting others---benefiting sentient beings through generosity, guiding their minds through kind speech, helping them through beneficial action, and influencing them through shared endeavor. Compared with self-benefit, benefiting others requires special attention to skillful interaction with people; we must offer help in ways the other person is willing to accept. Otherwise, we will not achieve the desired effect and may even make things worse, provoking resistance. If we examine our own attitudes and conduct against these standards, we can implement the bodhisattva path in daily life, not just in slogans.
It is especially important to note that among the six perfections, the perfection of wisdom is the root: "The other five perfections are blind; prajñā is their guide." If we do not rely on the wisdom of prajñā to cut off the ordinary mind, the generosity, discipline, patience, diligence, and meditation we cultivate may merely be worldly wholesome deeds, and what we ultimately achieve may only be the lesser fruits of the human and heavenly realms---causes with outflows. Only under the guidance of prajñā can generosity and other wholesome deeds become provisions for the Buddha path. Therefore, the correct view of emptiness is indispensable in the process of cultivating the six perfections.
Prajñā and skillful means are vital components of the bodhisattva path. As the *Abbreviated Lamrim* says: "If one practices only one of skillful means and wisdom, one cannot attain buddhahood." The *Mahāvairocana Sutra* also states: "That omniscience arises from the root of great compassion, arises from the cause of bodhicitta, and reaches culmination through skillful means." Buddhahood possesses the two qualities of compassion and wisdom. The great loving-kindness and great compassion attained by the Buddha have bodhicitta as their cause and are achieved through altruistic skillful means such as generosity. If bodhicitta is not generated, even if one realizes the wisdom of emptiness like a śrāvaka practitioner, this can only bring personal liberation and cannot perfect unsurpassed enlightenment.
The practice of engaging bodhicitta is built on the foundation of aspiring bodhicitta. The bodhisattva path follows from the aspiring mind, and through the six perfections and four means of gathering, the aspiring mind is strengthened. The bodhicitta we initially generate is only conventional bodhicitta, and its power is still very weak. If this bodhi seed does not receive care and nourishment, it may soon wither. Only by tending it wholeheartedly, timely replenishing its nutrients, and creating a healthy space for it to grow can the seed grow into a towering tree. Therefore, after generating bodhicitta, we must also receive the bodhisattva precepts. These vast bodhisattva practices are the very best nourishment for bodhicitta.
In addition to the *Yogācāra Bodhisattva Precepts*, another set mainly upheld in China is the *Brahmā's Net Bodhisattva Precepts*, from the *Brahmā's Net Sutra*'s chapter on the bodhisattva mind-ground precepts, which has ten root and forty-eight secondary precepts. Both of these apply to both monastics and lay practitioners. There is also the lay bodhisattva precepts from the *Upāsaka Precepts Sutra*'s chapter on receiving precepts, with six root and twenty-eight secondary precepts.
> 3. Ultimate Bodhicitta
Although we vow to benefit sentient beings and put it into action, for ordinary beings, these vows and actions are still not ultimate. This is because they are built on a conventional mental foundation---they are conditioned, limited, and full of inequality. Hence, they are called conventional bodhicitta. How can we transform this limited aspiring mind into boundless compassion? It requires purification and expansion through the wisdom of emptiness, gradually removing the impurities that have become mixed in during the process of aspiration. Only by thoroughly realizing emptiness can we truly awaken to the fact that we and all sentient beings are fundamentally one, and only then can we give rise to the unconditional great compassion and shared-essence compassion of the buddhas and bodhisattvas. Therefore, ultimate bodhicitta can only arise after realizing emptiness---in other words, it is something only first-stage bodhisattvas can achieve.
VI. The Causes and Conditions for Generating Bodhicitta
How can we generate bodhicitta? The root of bodhicitta is altruism. But this "other" is not a specific "other" in our minds, nor our beloved family and friends, but all sentient beings. Benefiting all sentient beings is no easy matter. If we shut the door and imagine benefiting all beings inwardly, that is relatively easy---because there are no concrete beings involved, none of those people we dislike. But in reality, sentient beings come in all shapes and forms, and a fair number of them may be people we dislike or even resent, the very people we normally try to avoid. Yet the Buddhadharma tells us that we should give rise to a mind of equality toward all sentient beings. Even if they are our enemies, even if they have repeatedly harmed and vexed us, we must treat them equally, without the slightest grudge. And not only that---we must further generate gratitude toward them, thanking them for helping us perfect our practice. For most people, this is truly an enormous challenge.
Almost everyone has people they especially cherish and care about---children in their parents' eyes, lovers in young people's eyes. Why can't we extend this care and concern to all sentient beings? The root lies in our mind. In our current state, we have not yet developed a mind that cares for all beings. What plays the dominant role in our mind is usually emotion, and emotion is full of preferences and inequalities. With such a mindset, can we truly treat enemies and loved ones equally? Can we regard all beings with an equal eye? Even if we can manage a little on the surface, it is often very forced.
Benefiting others with a mind of impartial awakening sets an extremely high bar for our mental patterns. Yet it is precisely through this that the qualities of buddhas and bodhisattvas are cultivated---there is no second path. Faced with such difficulties and inner conflicts, we can first use visualization and the corresponding skillful means to overcome our limitations and activate the positive inner forces such as impartial altruism. Within our life, we are fundamentally endowed with the same mind as the buddhas and bodhisattvas, endowed with the same boundless compassion. The key is to awaken this long-dormant mind and allow it to take effect.
Bodhicitta is also dependently arisen. As Master Xing'an said in his *Exhortation to Generate Bodhicitta*: "This bodhicitta is the king of all wholesome dharmas. It must have its causes and conditions in order to arise." Bodhicitta is the mental state with the highest level and greatest energy among all wholesome dharmas, and its fulfillment is the most perfect. But such wholesome dharma does not emerge out of thin air; it depends on the convergence of various causes and conditions. The generation of bodhicitta usually follows these paths.
> 1. The Sevenfold Cause and Effect
In the *Seven Points of Mind Training*, Atiśa taught the sevenfold cause-and-effect method, progressing from recognizing all beings as our mothers, recollecting their kindness, repaying their kindness, cultivating loving-kindness, cultivating compassion, and generating the extraordinary attitude to entering bodhicitta. Among these, recognizing all beings as our mothers, recollecting their kindness, and repaying their kindness are the prelude to generating bodhicitta, while cultivating loving-kindness and compassion belong to the content of bodhicitta.
"Recognizing all beings as our mothers" means seeing all sentient beings as our own birth mothers. Throughout beginningless time, all beings have at some point been our flesh-and-blood relatives---parents, elders, older or younger siblings. As the *Brahmā's Net Sutra* says: "All men have been my fathers; all women have been my mothers." Many other Buddhist scriptures also discuss this relationship. But for modern people, whether "recognizing mothers" can actually arouse the mind of repaying kindness is highly questionable. A considerable number of people are unwilling even to honor and serve their present-life mothers, let alone mothers from past lives. Some might think that treating all beings as our own children would work better, since the overwhelming majority of people care deeply and lovingly for their children. There are indeed similar teachings in the sutras, saying that bodhisattvas should regard all beings as their only children. But why emphasize "recognizing mothers" here? Because what follows involves "recollecting kindness" and "repaying kindness." People's love for their children is instinctive, born of nature, but we cannot generate the same natural love for all sentient beings. Hence, we must still "recognize mothers." Seeing all beings as mothers is the start of the bodhicitta cultivation method and also its key.
"Recollecting kindness" means remembering the nurturing kindness our mothers have shown us. Starting from the ten months of pregnancy, they not only gave us this physical body and nourished our growth but also cared for us meticulously throughout the entire process of growing up, investing untold labor and love. When we contemplate in this way, we should frequently recite the *Sutra on the Profound Kindness of Parents*, which elaborates in detail on parental kindness.
The kindness of parents is as weighty as a mountain---how could we know of this kindness and not repay it? We must give rise to the mind of repaying kindness not only toward our present-life parents but also toward the parents of all our lives, and further toward all mother-like sentient beings. Since beginningless time, all sentient beings have at some point been our most intimate parents---not only human beings but all sentient beings in every life form.
Next is cultivating loving-kindness---the wish to give happiness. Having recognized the kindness of our parents, we should do our utmost to repay it, bringing them joy and well-being, and bringing joy and well-being to all sentient beings as well. Only when we feel gratitude toward all beings can loving-kindness become universal. Cultivating loving-kindness also requires skillful means: we can begin with our own family members and people we like, gradually extending to those toward whom we feel neutral or indifferent, and finally to our enemies and adversaries. Step by step in this sequence, we can progressively expand our heart's capacity, improving our own mental state even as we benefit others. When our heart can accommodate more and more beings, the narrow self dissolves accordingly. Our mind falls into limitation precisely because of the two graspings of self and phenomena; it becomes narrow and petty. If we can give rise to loving-kindness toward all sentient beings, we can break free from the bonds of these two graspings and return to boundlessness.
Cultivating compassion means removing the suffering of all sentient beings. Suffering can be classified into three kinds or eight kinds. The former are the suffering of suffering, the suffering of change, and the all-pervasive suffering of conditioning. The latter are the suffering of birth, aging, illness, death, separation from what we love, meeting what we hate, not getting what we seek, and the suffering of the five aggregates. From the Buddhist perspective, all sentient beings are drowning in the ocean of suffering. Even those who temporarily enjoy some happiness are still sowing the causes of future eons of suffering. Therefore, we must give rise to compassion and vow to rescue them from pain. At the same time, we must actively uphold and propagate the Buddhadharma, for without the illumination of the Buddha's wisdom, the world would sink into utter darkness. This feeling of "unable to bear the suffering of sentient beings, unable to bear the decline of the noble teaching" is precisely the driving force behind our seeking the Buddha path above and transforming sentient beings below.
So, how can we give rise to this feeling of being unable to bear the suffering of sentient beings? Faced with the suffering of others, we often turn a blind eye, displaying an indifference that says, "This has nothing to do with me." If we see someone we dislike suffering, we might even gloat. These are all common problems in the process of cultivating compassion. Sometimes, when people come seeking the Dharma or asking for help, we might blurt out without thinking, "I don't have time." Why are we more accustomed to refusing than offering help? Precisely because we cannot feel the suffering of sentient beings as our own. We may even find ourselves a high-sounding excuse: "I'm busy with more important matters right now."
Self-grasping is extremely cunning. When we don't want to be compassionate toward sentient beings, it will find all sorts of justifications, allowing us to forgive our own faults with a clear conscience and easily regain psychological equilibrium. In fact, how many justifications we have is not what matters. What matters is: is the motive behind those justifications altruistic? If not, then no amount of justification is anything more than self-deception, merely making our existing faults more entrenched, more concealed, and harder to correct. To transform from the ordinary mind into the great loving-kindness and great compassion of buddhas and bodhisattvas, we must not only treat sentient beings with a tender heart and deeply feel their suffering, but also face ourselves with a resolute heart, never indulging the self's tricks for any reason.
Cultivating loving-kindness and compassion involves visualization on the one hand. According to Tibetan Buddhist requirements, one must practice the bodhicitta ritual three times a day. The purpose of both ritual practice and visualization is to nurture this mental pattern. Each time we visualize, the power of compassion is strengthened once in our thinking. In Buddhist practice, the power of visualization can be used to transform mental states, because what practice accomplishes is not an objective result. If we were building a school, then an objective building would be the goal. But the fruit of practice is primarily an inner transformation, and its key lies in the dynamics of mental functioning.
Daily visualization is a necessary process for transforming mental patterns. In Yogācāra terms, it is the process of "seeds giving rise to manifest activity, manifest activity perfuming seeds." If we have just practiced loving-kindness and compassion meditation on the cushion, then when we see a person we normally dislike, we are less likely to feel strong aversion. Even if we fail to control our thoughts well, we are more likely to recognize the mistake afterward and feel ashamed. Thus, cushion practice and off-cushion application are complementary aspects. While practicing the bodhicitta ritual in seated meditation, we must also constantly apply and adjust it in daily life. It is like drilling wood to make fire: two sticks must be rubbed together continuously before the spark of compassion and wisdom can be struck.
The highest attainment in Buddhist study is none other than the perfection of bodhicitta, the perfection of compassion. If we could achieve buddhahood by cultivating just one practice, it would surely be compassion. As the *Avatamsaka Sutra* says: "Even empty space can be measured, but bodhicitta is beyond knowing---and the reason it cannot be measured is that great compassion is immeasurable." Some might ask: Isn't buddhahood the attainment of both compassion and wisdom? Why would cultivating compassion alone suffice? This is because perfect compassion necessarily includes wisdom. Without the wisdom of emptiness, compassion cannot reach ultimate perfection, cannot free itself from the defiled ordinary mind, and remains merely a conditioned, limited worldly good deed. For a long time, the propagation of bodhicitta has tended to emphasize altruism without stressing the relationship between wisdom and compassion. In fact, cultivating compassion likewise depends on the guidance of prajñā wisdom. If there is compassion without wisdom, good intentions can easily lead to bad outcomes. Therefore, we should simultaneously nurture both compassion and wisdom, without neglecting either.
Once compassion is present, we should further generate the extraordinary attitude---that is, an intense altruistic intention. This is the guiding force that leads to the generation of bodhicitta and a special condition for its arising.
> 2. Exchanging Self and Other
In addition to the seven points of mind training, Śāntideva's "exchanging self and other" is another important teaching for cultivating bodhicitta. Theoretically, exchanging self and other is highly convincing. What characterizes ordinary beings? Precisely the cherishing of self and the discarding of sentient beings---always thinking of oneself, indifferent toward others. Self-grasping originates from ignorance. It is an innate force, continually nourished throughout the endless continuity of lives. Hence, this grasping pervades almost every mental activity and is the fundamental force shaping the ordinary personality.
Although on some level of life we are no different from the buddhas and bodhisattvas, at present we are still ordinary beings. Why? Precisely because of ignorance and self-grasping. Once these two are resolved, we will no longer be ordinary beings. All afflictions and unwholesome karma also stem from this. Self-grasping is constantly packaging itself, protecting its own interests, and finding every way to avoid anything unfavorable to itself. Killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying---which of these is not due to my greed, my hatred, my ignorance? We are entangled in greed, hatred, and ignorance, yet we do so only to seek happiness, never intending to create suffering. But in the end, it brings us endless bitter results. Thus, it is said that self-grasping is the door to all decline and ruin.
So what exactly is this "self" that we construct and grasp? When we speak of what is grasped, we first must consider the grasper, that is, conscious activity. But everything consciousness grasps---whether the mental or the physical aspect---is illusory and impermanent; no fixed substance can be found. Where is the foothold of life? Where is our place of true security? The wealth, family, and career we cling to are all temporary, in a state of flux and change. The true foothold of life is surely not what consciousness grasps; it cannot be fully captured by either "self" or "non-self." What is certain is that the self constructed by consciousness is absolutely mistaken. Yet this mistaken construction has, since beginningless time, become the source of all suffering. We have set up an unstable object as our basis, but as the self, we must try with all our might to protect this instability. To protect instability as if it were stable---how exhausting that is. Lamentably, we have always been caught up in this meaningless struggle, almost without exception. The primary purpose of studying Buddhism is to destroy self-grasping. It is precisely because they transcended self-grasping that the arhats were able to realize nirvāṇa and cut off afflictions.
The practice of exchanging self and other, though it begins from the ordinary mind, requires one cognitive prerequisite: a genuine recognition that "self-grasping is the door to all decline and ruin, and altruism is the root of all merit." These two statements are extremely important. The reason the buddhas and bodhisattvas have been able to liberate themselves from birth and death and accomplish boundless merit is precisely that all their thoughts and actions proceed from altruism.
Altruism may seem quite ordinary---many people engage in altruistic acts, including many who have not studied Buddhism. But to what degree is their altruism pure? If we measure altruistic purity on a hundred-point scale, the buddhas' purity is one hundred, while the purity of ordinary beings is at most several dozen or even just a few points, mixed in with greed, self-grasping, arrogance, and other afflictions. As ordinary beings, even when we act altruistically, the compassion we generate is often outweighed by the self-grasping or attachment to merit mixed in.
The purest altruism is the most thorough compassion. Its standard is twofold: realizing the threefold purity, and taking all sentient beings as its object. To achieve these two, we must deeply recognize the faults of self-grasping. Self-grasping is not only powerful; it is also skilled at disguise. No matter what we do, even the most selfish thing, we can usually find a respectable excuse. That is precisely what makes self-grasping so formidable. Let us look inward, and then observe others: we will find that people can always find reasons for whatever they do. There are reasons for doing good and reasons for doing bad; reasons we can speak aloud and reasons we cannot; reasons for answering others and reasons for comforting ourselves. Therefore, we must become skilled at unmasking the true face of the self. In truth, exposing the self's tricks and schemes is like uncovering one's own unsightly scars---pain is inevitable. But we have no other choice; we must act decisively. Otherwise, we will continue, as always, to be directed by self-grasping and continue, as always, to wander through birth and death.
Altruism not only develops compassion but also breaks down self-grasping. If self-grasping is strong, we certainly cannot be purely altruistic. When we resolve to benefit others, the first to oppose us will surely be self-grasping, and the one creating obstacles will likewise be self-grasping. This also proves, from the other side, that altruism is a powerful weapon for destroying self-grasping.
Once we have fully recognized the faults of self-grasping and the merit of altruism, we are qualified to practice exchanging self and other. Take the mind that cherishes the self, protects the self, and seeks every way to benefit the self, and turn it toward benefiting sentient beings. Take the mind that discards sentient beings, remains indifferent to them, and keeps a safe distance, and turn it toward oneself. This is how exchanging self and other works. If we can develop the same kind of loving-kindness toward sentient beings that we normally reserve for ourselves, the seed of bodhicitta begins to sprout. Further, we treat all sentient beings equally, without the slightest distinction between close and distant, so that altruism extends to all. The practice of exchanging self and other is a special skillful means for giving rise to bodhicitta. As long as we do it earnestly, step by step, we will gradually achieve the unconditional great compassion and shared-essence compassion of the buddhas and bodhisattvas.
> 3. The Ten Causes and Conditions
Among the teachings on bodhicitta in Chinese Buddhism, the most widely circulated is undoubtedly Master Xing'an's *Exhortation to Generate Bodhicitta*. In it, he discusses the eight aspects of bodhicitta: deviant and correct, genuine and false, great and small, partial and perfect. When we first generate aspiration, it is difficult to get it completely right. This requires constant examination: Is this aspiration deviant or correct? Genuine or false? Great or small? Partial or perfect? Each has its corresponding criteria, enabling us to check ourselves point by point, see where our problems lie, and make timely adjustments.
In his *Exhortation to Generate Bodhicitta*, Master Xing'an summarizes ten causes and conditions for generating bodhicitta. If we frequently contemplate these points, we will feel that generating bodhicitta is the only choice in life; apart from it, nothing is more meaningful. The ten causes and conditions are: recollecting the Buddha's profound kindness, recollecting parents' kindness, recollecting teachers' kindness, recollecting benefactors' kindness, recollecting the kindness of sentient beings, recollecting the suffering of birth and death, honoring one's own spiritual nature, repenting karmic obstacles, seeking rebirth in the Pure Land, and ensuring the Dharma endures for long.
First is recollecting the Buddha's profound kindness. Because the Buddha proclaimed the essential Dharma, the Buddhadharma has been transmitted in the world, and sentient beings have thus found the path to liberation. With his great loving-kindness and great compassion, the Buddha earnestly taught the Dharma and liberated beings for forty-five years. How can we repay such incomparable kindness? We must generate bodhicitta: "Offering this body and mind to the lands as numerous as dust particles---this is called repaying the Buddha's kindness." Merely liberating ourselves is insufficient to repay it. Of course, the prerequisite is that we must recognize how profound the Buddha's kindness truly is. This recognition, in turn, is based on an intense concern for our own life. If we do not take seeing the path and liberating ourselves from birth and death seriously, we cannot appreciate the Buddha's kindness to us or recognize the Buddhadharma's significance for life. But if, in the course of our life's journey, we have searched high and low, studied all worldly philosophies and religions without finding the path to liberation, and finally found the way out through the Buddhadharma---for such a person, the Buddha's profound kindness can be deeply felt. Modern people have easy access to the Dharma; we can even sit at home and listen to Dharma masters' teachings through recordings and videos. This makes it difficult to develop a sense of rarity and preciousness. In fact, our attitude toward hearing the Dharma directly affects how much we benefit from it. The more we treasure the Dharma, the greater the benefit, and vice versa.
Second is recollecting parents' kindness. The kindness of nurturing is beyond repayment. Only by generating bodhicitta can we best repay our parents. When Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva was cultivating in his causal stage, his mother, due to wrong views and lack of faith in the Three Jewels, fell into the evil destinies. To save his mother, Kṣitigarbha made great vows. But the very moment he made those vows, not only was his mother born from hell into the heavens, but all the beings in the Avīci Hell that day were also born into the heavenly realms. This shows that after generating bodhicitta, we can repay not only the kindness of our present-life parents but also the kindness of parents from countless past lives. Otherwise, if we ourselves have no way out, how can we repay our parents' profound kindness?
Third is recollecting teachers' kindness. In our process of growing up, it is thanks to worldly teachers that we come to understand various fields of knowledge and moral principles; it is thanks to world-transcending teachers that we can hear the Buddhadharma and understand the path to liberation. The Tibetan tradition's great emphasis on the guru truly has deep significance. The guru not only transmits the authentic Dharma to us but also guides us in applying it to practice. The buddhas of the ten directions are indeed important, but without the guru as a bridge, we could not become Buddhist disciples, could not develop faith in the Buddha, or begin practicing the Dharma and benefiting from it. A realized guru is himself or herself a symbol of the Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha. Through reverence for the guru, we can also help destroy self-grasping and receive the true benefit of the Dharma from that reverence. How can we repay the kindness of our teachers? We must also generate bodhicitta and perpetuate the lineage of the Buddha. Our teachers have transmitted the path of practice to us; the only proper repayment is for us to earnestly carry it on, propagate it, and thereby benefit sentient beings.
Fourth is recollecting benefactors' kindness. Making a living in modern times is not easy; people toil all day for their livelihood. They live to survive, and survive to live. As monastics, we do not need to struggle for survival; we can lead a life devoted to seeking truth and liberation---this is truly an immense blessing. Therefore, no matter what our living conditions are like, we should be full of gratitude toward the Three Jewels and the wider society. How can we repay the support of the faithful donors who have created these conditions for our study and practice? Again, by generating bodhicitta, practicing diligently, and spreading the Dharma to benefit beings. Only in this way do we have the merit to properly receive the offerings of the faithful.
Fifth is recollecting the kindness of sentient beings. Since beginningless time, all sentient beings have at some point been our parents and siblings, and all have shown us kindness. But in the wandering of birth and death, some have fallen into the hell realms, some are immersed in the realm of hungry ghosts, some are circling through the animal realm. Even those fortunate enough to be born in happy destinies cannot enjoy happiness forever; once their blessings are exhausted, they are bound to fall. If we think only of our own liberation and simply leave them behind, how could we bear it in our hearts? Thinking of sentient beings' kindness to us, thinking of their suffering, we have no choice but to generate bodhicitta, taking the deliverance of all mother-like sentient beings as our personal mission---repaying the four great kindnesses above and relieving the sufferings of the three lower realms below. Only thus can we give back to society and to all sentient beings.
Sixth is recollecting the suffering of birth and death. Through endless births and deaths, we have experienced everything---fallen into the hells, been animals. Even when born human, we have not necessarily lived happily. In the journey of our past lives, we were probably like many people who never heard the Buddhadharma, living mediocre, confused, and perplexed lives. Day after day, we squander our time; life after life, we waste our existence. In the torrent of life, the only thing we can grasp is this present thought, this present moment. We cannot even be sure about tomorrow. Can we guarantee that we will still be alive tomorrow? The past is already gone, beyond our grasp; the future has not yet arrived, also beyond our grasp. How can we use this present identity to improve our life? The only thing we can do is still to generate bodhicitta. Of course, we could also generate renunciation. But if we only generate renunciation, we cannot benefit all sentient beings, and it is ultimately not the perfect aspiration.
Seventh is honoring one's own spiritual nature. We may never have imagined that we and all the buddhas, bodhisattvas, and patriarchs through the ages are fundamentally no different. In our own mind-nature, we share the same dimension as they do. Yet they have already become buddhas and patriarchs while we are still wandering in samsara. We are born with a priceless treasure within, yet we live as beggars. How can we face our own inner riches? Out of respect for this life quality, we should also generate bodhicitta. Otherwise, we can never unearth this treasure; it can only lie buried. Of course, śrāvakas also uncover it, but not completely. Only the buddhas and bodhisattvas who have generated bodhicitta can thoroughly uncover this treasure and bring all its functions to full perfection.
Eighth is repenting karmic obstacles. There are many ways to repent, but the best is generating bodhicitta. Once bodhicitta is generated, what governs our life is bodhicitta, not karmic obstacles. We know that karma is the force propelling the continuity of life. Our present identity is the result of one phase of karma. What we call destiny is also intimately related to karma. The guiding karma and completing karma constitute the general and specific results of life and follow certain laws. But destiny can also be changed. The moment bodhicitta is generated, our destiny will unfold along the trajectory of bodhicitta, no longer drifting along the course set by karmic forces. This is because bodhicitta is the king of all wholesome dharmas; its power is fierce and unstoppable. Having generated bodhicitta, we have already taken hold of the rudder of destiny. Therefore, once bodhicitta is truly generated, there is no need for any further worry, because the power of bodhicitta can destroy everything. How great is the power of the entire universe? Yet bodhicitta can concentrate the power of the whole universe into a single thought. What could possibly obstruct it? Thus, the best way to repent is also generating bodhicitta.
Ninth is seeking rebirth in the Pure Land. Pure Land practitioners recite the Buddha's name seeking rebirth in the Land of Ultimate Bliss. In fact, the best method for rebirth in the Pure Land is also generating bodhicitta. When we practice based on bodhicitta, at the moment of death, the king of bodhicitta vows can, in a single thought, propel us to the Western Pure Land, where we will attain perfect enlightenment and then, according to our own wishes, travel to worlds in the ten directions to teach the Dharma and liberate beings. As the *Practices and Vows of Samantabhadra* states: "Further, when this person is on the verge of death... only this king of vows does not abandon them; at all times, it guides them forward. In a single instant, they attain rebirth in the Land of Ultimate Bliss. Upon arrival, they see Amitābha Buddha, Mañjuśrī Bodhisattva, Samantabhadra Bodhisattva, Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva, Maitreya Bodhisattva, and others. These bodhisattvas, with their majestic forms and perfect merits, surround them. The person sees themselves born from a lotus flower and receives the Buddha's prediction of enlightenment. After receiving the prediction, over countless hundreds of thousands of myriads of hundred-millions of nayutas of eons, throughout untold worlds in the ten directions, they employ the power of wisdom and, according to the minds of sentient beings, bring them benefit. Before long, they will sit at the seat of enlightenment, subdue the armies of Māra, attain perfect enlightenment, turn the wondrous Dharma wheel, and enable beings as numerous as the finest particles of dust in buddha-lands to generate bodhicitta, teaching and maturing them according to their faculties, and for eons as vast as oceans in the future, they will broadly benefit all sentient beings."
Tenth is ensuring the Dharma endures for long. Upholding the Buddhadharma fundamentally depends on generating bodhicitta. After generating bodhicitta, our strength becomes inexhaustible. If we work from the ordinary mind, we are inevitably of two minds. Today we think of liberating sentient beings; tomorrow we think it is better to retreat and practice in seclusion. This is the mental state monastics are most prone to: one moment advancing, the next wanting to retreat. Why do worldly people consider monastics passive? Because we can find scriptural support for both advancing and retreating. The Buddhadharma is vast and profound; there seems to be solid justification for almost any course of action. The reason for this is simply that different stages of practice have different emphases. If we have generated bodhicitta, we should take whether or not we can benefit sentient beings as our measure.
Frequently contemplating these ten reasons can lay a solid foundation for generating bodhicitta. When we comprehensively examine life, we will see that generating bodhicitta is the only meaningful choice. Were it not grounded in the ultimate concern for life, it would seem that life offers many choices---we could develop in this direction or in that one. But none of these choices is ultimate; they bring only temporary benefit. To waste a precious human life, so rare and endowed with leisure and opportunity, for a little immediate gain---the price is far too high. Can we afford it? We may not be able to when we want to turn back. Only by generating bodhicitta can life find its true direction and be thoroughly liberated from samsara---not only liberating ourselves but also bringing liberation to all sentient beings.
VII. The Characteristics of Bodhicitta
In the mental world of ordinary beings, each kind of mental activity has its own characteristics: greed has the characteristics of greed, hatred has the characteristics of hatred, arrogance has the characteristics of arrogance. So what are the characteristics of bodhicitta? The *Avatamsaka Sutra* tells us: "To generate bodhicitta means to generate the mind of great compassion, to universally rescue all sentient beings; to generate the mind of great loving-kindness, to equally protect all worlds; to generate the mind of peace and joy, to cause all sentient beings to extinguish their sufferings; to generate the mind of benefiting, to cause all sentient beings to depart from unwholesome dharmas; to generate the mind of empathy, to protect all those who are fearful; to generate the mind without obstruction, to abandon all hindrances; to generate the vast mind, to pervade the entire Dharma-realm; to generate the boundless mind, reaching wherever empty space reaches; to generate the capacious mind, to behold all Tathāgatas; to generate the pure mind, with wisdom unhindered regarding the dharmas of the three times; to generate the mind of wisdom, to universally enter all oceans of wisdom."
In addition, many Mahayana scriptures and treatises elaborate on the content of bodhicitta from different angles, and the material is extremely rich. Based on my own study and practice, I have summarized several key points below. If we can grasp these essentials, our aspiration will never go astray in direction.
> 1. Awakening
The characteristic of the ordinary mind is non-awakening, also called ignorance. Deluded by ignorance, we fall into the two graspings of self and phenomena and the three poisons of greed, hatred, and ignorance, thereby creating the karma of samsara. That is why the first link of the twelvefold dependent origination is ignorance. Ordinary beings, due to ignorance, are unawakened in every thought. When self-grasping arises, because of non-awakening, we sink into the mire of self-grasping. When greed arises, because of non-awakening, we sink into the bondage of greed. When hatred arises, because of non-awakening, we sink into the flames of hatred. Continuously grasping at greed, hatred, ignorance, and their perceived images, we sink deeper and deeper, with the result that we wander through long eons.
Bodhicitta, by contrast, represents the power of awakening. As the *Mahāyāna Sutra on the Contemplation of the Originally Arisen Mind-Ground* states: "The mind of self-awakening can generate bodhi; this awakening mind is bodhicitta; the two are not different." The distinction between ordinary beings and sages hinges on the single thought of delusion or awakening: "The preceding thought deluded is the ordinary being; the succeeding thought awakened is the buddha. The preceding thought attached to objects is affliction; the succeeding thought free of objects is bodhi." The generation of bodhicitta marks the awakening of sentient life. This awakening dispels the long night of ignorance and illuminates the dream of birth and death. In bodhicitta practice, we must take awakening as fundamental, maintaining wakefulness in every thought, seeing the five desires and six sense objects as illusory dreams and bubbles, and clearly recognizing the manifestations of greed, hatred, ignorance, and the ordinary mind without being carried away by them. Thus, the *Mahāsaṃnipāta Sutra* says: "What is called generating bodhicitta? Clearly knowing the nature of greed is called generating bodhicitta. Moreover, clearly knowing hatred, ignorance, miserliness, jealousy, the aggregates, sense bases, and realms; ignorance, formations, consciousness, name-and-form, the six sense bases; and even birth, aging, sickness, death, and great suffering---this is called generating bodhicitta." We can see that clearly knowing the truth of greed, hatred, and ignorance is also an important aspect of generating bodhicitta.
As a bodhisattva, one not only clearly knows that self-grasping is the root of all faults but also clearly knows that altruism is the source of all merit. The term "bodhisattva" comes from the Sanskrit *bodhisattva*, "awakened sentient being". Therefore, while awakening themselves, bodhisattvas take awakening others as their mission, liberating sentient beings through the four immeasurables---loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity---and moving together toward the state of perfect awakening and action.
> 2. Selflessness and Altruism
The ordinary mind grasps at "self." In daily life, what people think of most often is precisely themselves. Their whole lives are spent struggling for their own clothing, food, shelter, and transportation; for fame, profit, status; for career and wealth. Yet all the afflictions, suffering, conflicts, and disputes in the world also arise from nothing other than this "self."
Selflessness is the core teaching that distinguishes Buddhism from worldly and non-Buddhist paths; in Buddhism, it is listed as one of the three Dharma seals. Whether in the śrāvaka path or the bodhisattva path, practice is built on the foundation of selflessness. Śrāvaka practitioners achieve liberation by knowing selflessness; bodhisattva practitioners can be completely altruistic by thoroughly realizing selflessness. In the process of generating bodhicitta and walking the bodhisattva path, the greatest obstacle is self-grasping. This is because the ordinary mind habitually thinks of "me" in everything---a deeply ingrained tendency. When we resolve to benefit all sentient beings, we inevitably face sharp conflicts with self-interest. Only by removing the obstacles on the road ahead can we advance boldly on the great path of bodhi. So how do we remove this obstacle? The Buddhadharma tells us that self-grasping is caused by ignorance---because we do not understand the truth of life, we either cling to the physical body as the self, or cling to various ideas as the self, or cling to property and career as the self. If we illuminate with the wisdom of prajñā, we can clearly see that all phenomena are illusory appearances produced by the convergence of causes and conditions, impermanent and selfless.
Once we thoroughly see the illusory and insubstantial nature of the "self," grasping at it becomes meaningless, and the chasm between self and other will vanish. Only by thoroughly realizing selflessness can we be completely altruistic; and through the practice of altruism, we can continue to dismantle self-grasping. The *Diamond Sutra* particularly emphasizes applying the insight of selflessness in practice: "A bodhisattva who generates the mind of unsurpassed, perfect enlightenment should give rise to this thought: I must liberate all sentient beings, causing them to enter the realm of nirvāṇa without remainder. Yet having thus liberated all sentient beings, not a single sentient being has truly been liberated. Why? Subhūti, if a bodhisattva clings to the notion of a self, a person, a sentient being, or a life span, they are not a bodhisattva. Why? Subhūti, there is in fact no dharma called 'generating the mind of unsurpassed, perfect enlightenment.'" Similar passages appear repeatedly throughout the sutra, earnestly instructing practitioners who have generated bodhicitta that in the process of cultivating the bodhisattva path, they must use the wisdom of emptiness to know that there is "no notion of self, no notion of person, no notion of sentient being, no notion of life span"---only thus can they become qualified bodhisattvas.
> 3. Boundlessness
The ordinary mind is limited. All its mental activities come from the accumulation of certain experiences in the continuity of life, and they have specific objects. Greed has the objects of greed, hatred has the objects of hatred, arrogance has the objects of arrogance---and these objects are necessarily limited. People only develop attachment toward pleasant and delightful circumstances; they cannot be attached to everything. They only develop hatred toward disagreeable conditions; they cannot hate everything.
Bodhicitta is different: its objects are boundless. Generating bodhicitta takes all sentient beings in the ten directions as its object and benefiting all sentient beings as its mission. This point is mentioned in many Mahayana scriptures. The *Avatamsaka Sutra* states: "A bodhisattva does not generate bodhicitta merely to teach and tame a single sentient being, nor to teach and tame a hundred sentient beings, nor even to teach and tame an inexpressibly inexpressible number of sentient beings... Therefore, O son of good family, only when all worlds are purified will my vows be fulfilled; only when the afflictive habits of all sentient beings are uprooted will my vows be complete." What vast and profound power of vows this is.
In the *Diamond Sutra*, the Buddha likewise gave this teaching on generating aspiration: "A bodhisattva-mahāsattva should thus subdue the mind: all the various kinds of sentient beings, whether egg-born, womb-born, moisture-born, or transformation-born; whether with form or without form; whether with thought or without thought, or neither with nor without thought---I shall cause them all to enter the nirvāṇa without remainder and liberate them." This similarly tells us that bodhisattvas should take the deliverance of all sentient beings as their object. Regardless of which realm they are in or what life form they take, all are the objects of the bodhisattva's full effort to deliver, without exception.
In the *Devarāja-pravara-prajñāpāramitā Sutra*, there is this dialogue: "World-Honored One, how does one generate bodhicitta? The Buddha said: Great king, by giving rise to great compassion. World-Honored One, how does one give rise to great compassion? The Buddha said: By not abandoning any sentient being." The heart of the buddhas and bodhisattvas, because they do not abandon any sentient being, is vast and boundless. In the familiar ten great vows of the *Practices and Vows of Samantabhadra*, whether paying homage to all buddhas or according with all sentient beings, every vow takes as its object all buddhas throughout the entire Dharma-realm, the realm of empty space, the ten directions and three times, or all sentient beings throughout the entire Dharma-realm, the realm of empty space, the oceans of worlds in the ten directions---fully embodying the vastness and boundlessness of bodhicitta.
> 4. Equality
The ordinary mind is unequal. Because ordinary beings have self-grasping and grasping-at-mine, they are destined to be unable to treat all equally. Because there is a self, there is the division between self and other; because there is "mine," there is the distinction between close and distant. As ordinary beings, we always cling to self and discard others, and in our relationships with people, we are full of likes, dislikes, preferences, and rejections---thus giving rise to all kinds of inequality in the world.
The practice of bodhisattvas requires breaking free from this unequal ordinary mind. After generating bodhicitta, on the one hand, we must recognize through listening and reflecting on the teachings that all dharmas are equal and all sentient beings are equal. On the other hand, we must, through meditative cultivation and actual practice, give rise to a genuine mind of equality toward all sentient beings. For a bodhisattva practitioner, if there remains even the slightest discrimination between those we like and dislike, close and distant, we cannot be qualified bodhisattvas. As Master Tsongkhapa points out in the *Lamrim*: "If one does not first eliminate the categorization of attachment to one kind of sentient being and aversion to another and cultivate equanimity, then however one may generate compassion, it will still have categories." Therefore, the equanimity of impartiality is also an essential practice for bodhisattva practitioners.
The compassion of bodhisattvas is unconditional great compassion and shared-essence great compassion. Unconditional means without any added conditions; shared essence means without distinction between self and other, liked and disliked, close and distant. Such compassion is built on the equality of self and other. The *Practices and Vows of Samantabhadra* tells us: "Because the mind is equal toward all sentient beings, one can achieve perfect great compassion." Because of impartial equality toward all sentient beings, perfect great compassion is achieved. In fact, it is not only bodhisattva practitioners who should maintain equality---the Buddha himself set this example for us. In the *Sāgaramati-paripṛcchā Sutra*, the assembled bodhisattvas praised him thus: "Knowing the bodhicitta of equality, the World-Honored One constantly practices the Dharma of equality." The World-Honored One's conduct precisely illustrates the significance of cultivating the mind of equality.
> 5. Signlessness and Non-Attainment
The ordinary mind clings to signs. Because ordinary beings are full of the view of intrinsic nature, they experience everything in the world of body and mind as substantially real, clinging to real notions of beautiful and ugly, pure and impure, real self and real mine. Hence, whatever they do is done with a mind seeking attainment. If we stand on the ground of the ordinary mind---which is attached to signs and attainment---then no matter how hard we try, what we ultimately develop is still the ordinary mind.
Bodhicitta, by contrast, is signless. First, "a bodhisattva should generate the mind of unsurpassed, perfect enlightenment free from all signs"---the generation itself is signless. Second, in the process of walking the bodhisattva path, we must also not dwell on signs. As the *Diamond Sutra* says: "(When giving) one should not give rise to a mind that dwells on form, nor on sound, smell, taste, touch, or mental objects; one should give rise to a mind that dwells nowhere." In this passage, the Buddha instructs us: when giving, do not dwell on the sign of giving; do not cling to the notion of a giver who gives, a recipient who receives, or a gift that is given. Only with the threefold purity can the perfection of generosity be fulfilled and become provision for the bodhisattva path. Otherwise, how would it differ from the wholesome deeds of humans and gods? This applies to generosity, and the same holds for all six perfections and myriad practices. Third, when bodhisattvas cultivate all Dharma gates, they must not only avoid dwelling on signs but must also not give rise to a mind of attainment. This is what the *Diamond Sutra* emphasizes: "There is in fact no dharma called arhat. World-Honored One, if an arhat should think, 'I have attained the path of the arhat,' that would be clinging to self, person, sentient being, and life span. World-Honored One, the Buddha has said that I have attained the samādhi of non-contention and am foremost among humans, the foremost arhat free from desire. Yet I do not think, 'I am an arhat free from desire.' World-Honored One, if I were to think, 'I have attained the path of the arhat,' the World-Honored One would not call Subhūti one who delights in dwelling free of contention. Because Subhūti truly has nothing that he practices, he is called one who delights in dwelling free of contention." Whether dwelling on signs or on attainment, both are expressions of the ordinary mind. Only by thoroughly realizing signlessness and non-attainment can we achieve ultimate bodhicitta and perfect unsurpassed buddhahood.
The practice of bodhicitta moves from aspiring bodhicitta into engaging bodhicitta. Whether in making vows or in actual practice, we should examine ourselves against the characteristics of bodhicitta, checking: Is this mental state awakened or not? Is it selfless or self-centered? Is it self-serving or altruistic? Is it equal or discriminatory? Is it limited or boundless? Is it dwelling on signs or free from signs? Is it seeking attainment or free from attainment? The process of bodhicitta practice is precisely the process of continually adjusting our mental patterns. If our aspiration is unawakened, self-centered, self-serving, discriminatory, limited, sign-dwelling, and attainment-seeking, then it shows we are still thoroughgoing ordinary beings. Conversely, if our aspiration is endowed with the characteristics of awakening, selflessness, altruism, equality, boundlessness, non-dwelling, and non-attainment, then it is qualified bodhicitta, a mental state no different from that of all buddhas and bodhisattvas.
VIII. Models for the Practice of Bodhicitta
When we speak of models for the practice of bodhicitta, the buddhas and bodhisattvas come first. When we read Mahayana scriptures such as the *Sutra of the Merits of the Fundamental Vows of the Medicine Master Tathāgata of Lapis Lazuli Radiance*, the *Sutra of Immeasurable Life*, and the *Sutra of the Fundamental Vows of Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva*, we should not merely focus on what the buddhas and bodhisattvas can do for us. We should also see how they themselves attained realization. Their practices and Dharma gates during their causal stages are the best models for our own study and practice. Each buddha and bodhisattva has their own power of vows and approach to practice, some starting from great compassion, some from wisdom, displaying different paths of cultivation for us.
If we feel a particular affinity with Mañjuśrī Bodhisattva, we can choose Mañjuśrī's Dharma gate and study it, delving into the treasury of sutras until wisdom is as vast as the ocean, just as Mañjuśrī did. If we feel a particular affinity with Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva, we can choose Kṣitigarbha's Dharma gate and study it, vowing not to become a buddha until the hells are empty, just as Kṣitigarbha did. If we take Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva as our model for study, we should take Avalokiteśvara's vows as our own vows and Avalokiteśvara's conduct as our own standard of behavior, responding to the cries of the suffering, answering whenever called upon, as the bodhisattva does. If we take Amitābha Buddha as our model, we should take Amitābha's forty-eight vows as our guiding principles for practice, always remembering that our goal is to create a pure land and benefit boundless sentient beings.
We can even visualize ourselves as emanations of Avalokiteśvara or Amitābha Buddha. Establishing this identity can further inspire us to take the great vows of the buddhas and bodhisattvas as our personal mission, generating bodhicitta to seek true awakening and forgetting the self to benefit all beings. Buddhist practitioners should certainly be humble and modest, but this spirit of courageous commitment is extremely important. Otherwise, if we are content to remain at the level of ordinary beings, only knowing to beseech the buddhas without knowing to walk the buddhas' path, how can we ever develop the qualities of buddhas and bodhisattvas within ourselves? After we position ourselves as emanations of the buddhas and bodhisattvas, we must also continually draw closer to them in our mental patterns, until ultimately our awakening and action are perfect and we are no different from Avalokiteśvara or Amitābha.
In fact, this is exactly how Avalokiteśvara and Amitābha attained realization during their causal stages. And not only they---all buddhas and bodhisattvas attained realization this way. Before Śākyamuni Buddha, there were many other Śākyamuni Buddhas; before Amitābha, there were many other Amitābha Buddhas, as expressed in the phrase, "Homage to the thirty-six trillion, one hundred nineteen thousand five hundred Amitābha Buddhas of the same name in the Western Land of Ultimate Bliss." When they first began their practice, they too sought an ancient buddha as their model. Avalokiteśvara studied under the ancient Avalokiteśvara Buddha and then cultivated the Dharma gate of great compassion to achieve realization. Since the buddhas and bodhisattvas did it this way, we can also do exactly the same. To directly start from a particular buddha's or bodhisattva's power of vows and approach to practice, visualizing ourselves as emanations of Avalokiteśvara or Amitābha, will bring tremendous blessings and make it much easier to connect than relying solely on our own effort.
In Tibet, we often hear that a certain master is an emanation of Avalokiteśvara, or that another master is an emanation of Mañjuśrī. In fact, when we take a particular buddha or bodhisattva as our yidam and practice accordingly, what we ultimately realize are precisely the qualities of that buddha or bodhisattva. Seen from this angle, such statements are not without basis and need not be treated as myth. Of course, this is not to deny that some accounts involve embellishment or exaggeration. Yidam practice is not mysterious; we can perfectly well apply its methods to the cultivation of bodhicitta.
I normally live on the rear mountain of Nanputuo Monastery, which is a sanctuary of Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva. During my meditation, I visualize the entire Wulao Peak as Avalokiteśvara's maṇḍala and myself as an emanation of the bodhisattva, endowed with the same great loving-kindness and great compassion, and then I radiate this compassion throughout the worlds of the ten directions, wishing that all sentient beings, through this boundless compassion, may leave suffering and attain happiness. When we visualize in this way, our mental state resonates with the bodhisattva's. Of course, we have not yet reached the purity and intensity of Avalokiteśvara; the quality still needs further improvement. But through continuous practice and reinforcement, we can gradually draw closer in our mental patterns. Over time, not only can we generate boundless compassion toward sentient beings during seated meditation, but we can also gradually bring it into daily life. At that point, we will truly be emanations of Avalokiteśvara in both name and substance.
We can compile the important buddhas and bodhisattvas and their related Dharma gates from the Mahayana scriptures. Material about Avalokiteśvara can be organized as "Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva and the Avalokiteśvara Dharma Gate"; material about Kṣitigarbha can be organized as "Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva and the Kṣitigarbha Dharma Gate." This requires work in two areas: first, understanding how this bodhisattva practiced during their causal stage; second, understanding the distinctive features of this Dharma gate. In this way, it will not only greatly benefit our own study and practice but also provide learning resources for fellow practitioners who aspire to cultivate the bodhisattva path. The Mahayana sutras and treatises are not lacking in practice methods; it is just that we have not paid attention to them or found the right way to connect with them.
The *Avatamsaka Sutra* states: "Mind, Buddha, and sentient beings---among these three there is no difference." On the level of Dharma-nature, we and the buddhas and bodhisattvas are not essentially different. On the contrary, we share the same essence. When we merge ourselves with the buddhas and bodhisattvas in visualization, what takes effect in our mental patterns is precisely the qualities of the buddhas and bodhisattvas. Through this visualization, through emulating the conduct of the buddhas and bodhisattvas, we can activate the noble qualities within our life that are no different from theirs. Otherwise, our practice will remain at the level of the ordinary mind and cannot achieve an essential transcendence.
Although we are essentially the same as the buddhas and bodhisattvas, we still feel in our hearts that they are far beyond our reach. The reason is that what has always played the dominant role in our life is the ordinary mind, and what we ultimately develop can only be the ordinary mind. If we can practice according to the power of the buddhas' and bodhisattvas' vows, our mental patterns will gradually draw closer to theirs. In the early stages of practice, this aspiring mind still belongs to conventional bodhicitta, not ultimate bodhicitta. But we need not be discouraged. If conventional bodhicitta can be properly tuned, it is like the open sky seen through a pane of glass---though separated from the actual sky by one layer, it is already close. As long as we persevere unremittingly, the day will come when that pane of glass is smashed to pieces and we merge into the ocean of emptiness.
I believe that if we carefully study the practice approaches of all Mahayana bodhisattvas, we can fully organize them into concrete practice guidelines with strong applicability, leading us step by step along the path. In fact, beginning from the approach to practice is more powerful than beginning from theory. Among Buddhists, a fair number practice in a very detached manner, and most of these are people who start from theory, overly immersed in doctrinal study and indifferent to the real world. If we start from bodhicitta, taking the buddhas' and bodhisattvas' practice approaches as our starting point, and then use view to adjust our mental patterns, our study and practice will be very active. We will proactively spread the Dharma and benefit beings, voluntarily shouldering the work of the bodhisattvas rather than being content with "few activities, few undertakings, and few expectations."
IX. Conclusion
The foregoing introduction to bodhicitta has given you only a broad outline of the essentials of generating aspiration. In truth, every Mahayana scripture can serve as a textbook for bodhicitta and can be interpreted from the perspective of bodhicitta. Whether the *Avatamsaka Sutra*, the *Diamond Sutra*, or the *Mahāprajñāpāramitā Śāstra* and the *Yogācārabhūmi Śāstra*, all contain complete methods for generating aspiration, representing different levels of aspiration.
That we are fortunate enough to hear the Buddhadharma and find the method for liberating ourselves from afflictions is truly the fruit of blessings accumulated over many lifetimes. Since beginningless time, the two graspings of self and phenomena have been continually harming us. If we cannot make a breakthrough in practice, afflictions will trouble us endlessly into the future---this is the fundamental problem that Buddhist study must solve. Compared with the inner transformation of life, everything external is trivial. A little more knowledge or an extra diploma is like a dream, an illusion, a bubble, a shadow. Even to be a king with dominion over the entire world is only a few decades of glory and splendor, brief and illusory. In the boundless torrent of life, practice is our only way out. Only by walking the path of liberation pointed out by the Buddha can we find the light and awaken from the great dream of birth and death.
Generating bodhicitta is an enormous challenge to the self, and this is also the great difficulty we face in the process of aspiration. But as long as bodhicitta is generated properly, all afflictions become inconsequential. For afflictions arise from nothing other than the two graspings of self and phenomena, and bodhicitta is the best weapon for destroying these two graspings. In the Buddhadharma, different methods are usually employed to counter different afflictions. But the highest Dharma gate can resolve everything in a single move, dealing with the ever-changing by remaining constant. The bodhicitta teaching is precisely that one move of matchless power. Once applied, all problems are solved with ease.
I sincerely hope that this extraordinary teaching of bodhicitta will spread far and wide, so that the seeds of bodhicitta may be sown across the land of China. Of course, enthusiasm alone is not enough. While bodhicitta teachings lead the way, they must also be accompanied by profound methods of working with the mind as deeper guidance. As the scriptures say: "Bodhisattva-mahāsattvas also have two kinds of correct practice to solidify bodhicitta. What are the two? First, correctly recollecting bodhi practice; second, cultivating meditative concentration to cut off all afflictions." Prajñā and skillful means---one is the mother, the other the father; neither can be missing. Buddhahood is the fulfillment of compassion and wisdom. Specifically, it is the fulfillment of bodhicitta and the view of emptiness. If we work from both these directions and help produce a generation of genuine practitioners, the face of Chinese Buddhism will surely be transformed.
X. Questions and Answers
Student: Must the generation of bodhicitta be based on renunciation?
Venerable: Renunciation and bodhicitta belong to two different levels of aspiration. The Mahayana scriptures and treatises mainly focus on bodhicitta and rarely touch on renunciation. In the śrāvaka scriptures such as the Āgamas, renunciation is central, and bodhicitta is scarcely discussed. The linking of renunciation and bodhicitta is primarily found in the *Lamrim* as constructed by Master Tsongkhapa.
Early śrāvaka practitioners can be divided into two types: those fixed on tranquillity and those who turn from the small toward the great. The former generate renunciation and follow it all the way, directly realizing the fruit of arhatship without seeking further for the Buddha path. Their determination to leave the three realms is extremely intense; they seek nothing else. That is why, when the Buddha taught the *Lotus Sutra*, five thousand śrāvakas withdrew from the assembly---these belonged to the type fixed on tranquillity. The other type, after encountering the śrāvaka teachings, later had the opportunity to study the Mahayana and ultimately turned from the small toward the great, shifting from renunciation to bodhicitta.
During the Republican era, Master Taixu highly praised the *Lamrim* translated by Master Fazun, for this path is truly secure. The three principal paths constructed by Master Tsongkhapa---renunciation, bodhicitta, and the view of emptiness---corrected the widespread flaws that easily appear in practitioners' cultivation. Using renunciation as the foundation not only helps us break free from the ordinary mind but also gives rise to genuine, uncontrived bodhicitta---this is of great significance. Although many Mahayana scriptures do not emphasize this sequence and directly start from generating bodhicitta, liberation from the suffering of samsara is always the important prerequisite for practice.
If renunciation refers only to leaving samsara and attachment to the three realms, this content is already encompassed within bodhicitta. Bodhicitta possesses the characteristics of signlessness, non-dwelling, and non-attainment and is naturally free from attachment to the five desires and six sense objects. Thus, bodhicitta itself already includes part of what renunciation entails. Those with especially keen faculties can directly start from bodhicitta---this is also why the Mahayana scriptures often only discuss generating bodhicitta without emphasizing renunciation. It is just that for most people, bodhicitta is not easy to generate immediately, still less to generate properly. If our understanding is not clear, it is very easy in the course of aspiration to confuse bodhicitta with the ordinary mind, not even knowing what kind of mind we are actually generating, perhaps even mistaking the wholesome mind of the human and heavenly vehicles for bodhicitta. If renunciation is used as the foundation, the purity of bodhicitta is better assured.
We should also note that although aspiration can follow the conventional path from renunciation to bodhicitta, generating renunciation and realizing emptiness does not necessarily lead to the perfection of great loving-kindness and great compassion, nor does it necessarily lead to bodhicitta---otherwise, there would be no distinction between the śrāvaka vehicle and the bodhisattva vehicle. In Chinese Buddhism, whether Chan practitioners or Pure Land practitioners, although they study Mahayana Buddhism and recite Mahayana scriptures, they often only generate renunciation, treating personal liberation from birth and death as the entirety of practice while forgetting bodhicitta. Generating bodhicitta requires bringing forth compassion through corresponding observation and reflection. That is to say, it does not arise spontaneously; it still requires the convergence of causes and conditions, just as cultivating meditative concentration does not necessarily give rise to wisdom. In most people's impression, it seems that once concentration is attained, wisdom will burst forth immediately. This is not the case. Otherwise, why would non-Buddhist paths take the four dhyānas and eight concentrations as their ultimate goal, their final nirvāṇa? "From concentration arises wisdom" merely indicates that attaining concentration is one of the conditions for giving rise to wisdom; one must also cultivate the contemplation of impermanence, dependent origination, and selflessness to bring forth flawless wisdom.
Student: If bodhicitta is generated directly without renunciation as a foundation, can it cut off afflictions and bring liberation from birth and death? What is the relationship between Humanistic Buddhism and bodhicitta?
Venerable: If bodhicitta is generated, even the fruit of buddhahood can be achieved---how could it fail to cut off afflictions? Among all Dharma gates of practice, the merit and power of bodhicitta are supreme. On this point, the *Avatamsaka Sutra*'s verses in which Maitreya Bodhisattva praises bodhicitta contain an extremely detailed exposition.
As for the Humanistic Buddhism now being promoted, if it can be endowed with the content of bodhicitta and the view of emptiness, it can directly reach the fruit of buddhahood and truly realize what Master Taixu meant by "the perfection of the person is the perfection of buddhahood." But from the present situation, the propagation of Humanistic Buddhism does show a tendency toward superficiality, and there is a need to deepen its content. The path is upheld by people; the banner of Humanistic Buddhism is indeed timely. The key lies in how it is promoted and what view and depth are given to it.
Student: Are there also distinctions of sudden and gradual in generating bodhicitta? Is it possible to directly enter through ultimate bodhicitta?
Venerable: Whether a Dharma gate is sudden or gradual is determined by the level of one's view. The Huayan teaching that "the initial generation of bodhicitta is itself perfect enlightenment"---leaping directly into the Tathāgata's stage in a single bound---can be called the ultimate in perfect suddenness, unsurpassed. The teachings of Chan and Dzogchen also tell us that even on the level of the ordinary mind, the awakened mind can be touched. Because afflictions are without intrinsic nature, once we realize this, every thought can be liberated the moment it arises. It is like a snake that can untie its own coiled knots without needing any external help. However, these teachings require very high faculties; most people may not be able to practice them. By comparison, the Yogācāra teachings start from the level of the deluded mind and are easier to grasp. But when practicing according to Yogācāra doctrine, aspiration is just aspiration and the result is just the result---three great asaṃkhyeya eons slowly pass, and it is hard to believe that one can see the path and be liberated from birth and death in this very life. Therefore, Yogācāra students often tend to slacken in their practice. During the Republican era, many students of Yogācāra eventually turned it into philosophy, and the influence of this tendency persists to this day.
The normal path of practice proceeds from aspiring bodhicitta and engaging bodhicitta to ultimate bodhicitta. We can all begin from this conventional route, accumulating some provisions, and only then will we have the conditions and capacity to practice the teachings of direct entry.
Student: In the process of generating bodhicitta, what is the greatest obstacle?
Venerable: In the process of generating aspiration, the greatest enemy is precisely self-grasping. Self-grasping is utterly cunning; it will use all the knowledge we have learned, even the Buddhadharma itself, to disturb our mind, and its reasons are often high-sounding, making them hard to refuse. Therefore, we must clearly recognize: What do I truly want to achieve? This point is extremely important. Our aspiration determines our final attainment, but when it comes to specific tasks, it is often very difficult to tell which kind of mind is actually operating. For example, when we manage a practice center or teach the Dharma to benefit beings, on the surface it all seems to be bodhicitta at work. Perhaps we ourselves believe we are turning the great Dharma wheel and broadly liberating sentient beings, thinking we are not far from the buddhas and bodhisattvas. But what is the real mental basis? If we analyze carefully, it may be attachment, or it may be self-grasping. Such phenomena are everywhere. In the end, the larger the enterprise, the deeper the attachment to it. If this is the case, what we ultimately develop will inevitably be self-grasping and the thoroughgoing ordinary mind.
Student: Should we first benefit sentient beings, or should we first attain realization and then benefit them? Is there a sequential order between self-benefit and benefiting others?
Venerable: In the bodhicitta teachings, there are three different modes of generating aspiration: the king-like, the boatman-like, and the shepherd-like.
The first is the king-like aspiration, believing that one must first become a king before having the capacity to broadly aid the multitudes. This mode emphasizes self-benefit first, beginning altruistic activity only after reaching a considerable level of practice. Of course, the goal is always "for the sake of benefiting beings, may I attain buddhahood," not personal achievement. In Tibetan Buddhism, Milarepa exemplified this mode of aspiration. The second is the boatman-like aspiration: sharing the boat with passengers, practicing simultaneously, and reaching the other shore together. Many great masters throughout history actively spread the Dharma and benefited beings while simultaneously engaging in their own practice. The third is the shepherd-like aspiration: first drive the sheep and cattle home. Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva is the classic example of this, with his vow: "Only when all beings are liberated will I realize bodhi; until hell is empty, I vow not to become a buddha"---thinking only of sentient beings, not of himself at all.
Regarding these modes of aspiration, each person can choose according to their own situation. Some are suited to being a king, some prefer to be a boatman, and some wish to be a shepherd. Whichever mode is chosen, the common prerequisite and the foundation of aspiration must be altruism. That is to say, there must be no admixture whatsoever in the process of generating aspiration. If there is even the slightest defilement or tinge of self-interest, one will inevitably be unable to destroy self-grasping and perfect bodhi.
Student: Tibetan Buddhism teaches that one who has generated bodhicitta must not abandon any sentient being, yet it also particularly emphasizes keeping a distance from those who have broken their precepts. How should we resolve this contradiction?
Venerable: In the process of study and practice, we need to draw near to virtuous teachers and keep a distance from harmful companions. Confucius also said: Do not befriend those who are not your equals. That is, associate with friends who surpass you, so that you may learn from their example. This instruction is especially important for beginners. Because beginners often cannot distinguish good from bad and are easily influenced by their environment, the requirements for their environment must be strict---this benefits both academic progress and the perfection of character.
However, after reaching a certain level of attainment, one must take all sentient beings as the objects of deliverance. At that point, there is no longer any distinction between virtuous teachers and harmful companions. When Kṣitigarbha Bodhisattva vowed to go to the hells, he certainly did not go there to draw near to virtuous teachers. From the perspective of bodhisattva path practice, after generating bodhicitta, on the one hand, we should draw near to virtuous teachers; on the other, we should compassionately benefit others and not abandon any sentient being. When we speak of not abandoning sentient beings, the key lies in our mental state. As long as we are equal and impartial toward every sentient being, our compassion is perfect.
Thus, these two teachings are not contradictory. The Buddhadharma is adapted to the different faculties of sentient beings, and at different stages of practice, the requirements also differ.
Student: How can we perfect our aspiration? Must we liberate all sentient beings? What standard of merit must the fruit of buddhahood reach?
Venerable: To achieve unsurpassed bodhi, one certainly takes all sentient beings as the objects of deliverance. But this does not mean one must liberate all beings before becoming a buddha, because liberating beings is also a matter of causes and conditions---it is not something you can do just because you want to. Nor does the accumulation of the merits of buddhahood depend on reaching a certain quantity. In the common understanding, people tend to think that a bodhisattva's practice throughout three great asaṃkhyeya eons requires accumulating a certain amount of merit and liberating a certain number of beings to qualify---just as in society, earning a doctoral degree or professorship requires a certain number of achievements. But buddhahood is not an achievement on the phenomenal level, nor the attainment of external merit. If one clings to the mark of merit, one cannot perfect the fruit of buddhahood.
When we speak of liberating all sentient beings, we should not forget that we ourselves are also sentient beings. Of course, the key is not whether we have liberated ourselves or others, but whether our aspiration takes all sentient beings throughout the Dharma-realm as its object. When we practice, the key is not whether we are engaged in self-benefiting or other-benefiting practices, nor whether we are practicing calm abiding and insight or generosity---the key is: What is the aspiration behind this action? What is its object? This is the fundamental point. If our aspiration is perfect, all wholesome deeds we cultivate, including our own merit of practice and realization, are provisions for buddhahood.
Once we understand this principle, we will see that whether it is the king-like, boatman-like, or shepherd-like aspiration, there is essentially no difference. Even if we temporarily focus on self-cultivation and realization, our aspiration is still for the sake of benefiting others, not for ourselves. For example, is meditation self-benefiting or other-benefiting? If one meditates out of aversion to the world and avoidance of responsibility, lacking compassion for sentient beings and content merely with self-liberation, this is certainly not altruistic practice. Conversely, if one practices in order to better liberate sentient beings, then even the same act of meditation falls within the scope of altruistic practice. Clearly, the key lies in aspiration, not in the action itself. At different stages of practice, we may have different emphases, but our aspiration must be perfect---this point is extremely important.
In the past, practitioners placed greater emphasis on stopping unwholesome conduct. The bodhicitta teachings further require us to actively accomplish wholesome dharmas, benefit sentient beings, and perfect compassion. In this age, there is a special need to widely propagate the bodhicitta teachings. Once a vast aspirational mind has been generated, strength will flow forth continuously.
Student: At the beginning, the aspiration can be quite intense, but I often fail to sustain it. How should I deal with this?
Venerable: The difficulty of generating aspiration lies precisely in generating it accurately and sustaining it over the long term. This is the same principle as "doing one good deed is easy; what is difficult is doing good deeds for a lifetime." The power of mental patterns comes from accumulation. Generating aspiration once only has the power of one time, and that one time may not even be pure. The bodhicitta teachings are precisely meant to help us generate aspiration continuously and accurately, and to gradually consolidate it through view and practice. Among these, view is used to adjust our mental patterns, while practice brings bodhicitta into concrete reality, producing stable and sustained effects on the mind. In this way, the power of bodhicitta grows day by day.
Student: How should we put bodhicitta into practice?
Venerable: The practice of bodhicitta includes two aspects: visualization and altruistic action. Through visualization, we keep our mind constantly connected to sentient beings, never forgetting to benefit others whether walking, standing, sitting, or lying down. There are many concrete instructions for this way of working with the mind in the *Avatamsaka Sutra*'s chapter on pure conduct. When eating, we wish that all beings in the world may have ample food and clothing. When healthy and happy, we wish that all beings may likewise be healthy and happy. When encountering setbacks, we hope that whatever we endure may spare all beings from similar setbacks. By continuously visualizing in this way and bringing this mind to everything we do, bodhicitta will certainly grow rapidly.
When we have the opportunity to benefit others, we should see the other person as an auspicious condition for perfecting bodhicitta, feel grateful, and in the process never forget our original intention, acting thought after thought for the benefit of sentient beings. Before bodhicitta is perfected, this is indeed somewhat difficult. But as long as we have faith and practice perseveringly, this mental pattern can be consolidated. Over time, bodhicitta will arise spontaneously.
Student: What is the relationship between bodhicitta and right view?
Venerable: Once bodhicitta is generated, view finds its field of action. Whether Madhyamaka view or Yogācāra view, both can guide us in adjusting our mental patterns, removing the impurities that adhere to bodhicitta one by one. Emphasizing the importance of bodhicitta is by no means a denial of the role of doctrinal study. But what must be clear is that discoursing on emptiness and existence should not be taken as the purpose of study and practice.
In the process of Buddhist study, right view is extremely important. If one's view is not correct, practice cannot possibly advance. The Chan school places great value on the role of view, as expressed in the saying: "What matters is your view, not your conduct." This view is not merely the view of listening and reflection but, more importantly, the view of mental realization. If one's view has not reached the proper level, even if one practices diligently every day, what exactly is one practicing? Conversely, when view is correct, carrying firewood and drawing water, speech and silence, movement and stillness---all are unsurpassed wondrous practice. Thus, view and bodhicitta are non-dual. View needs a point of application to exert its function. When bodhicitta is generated, view finds its point of application.
Student: How should we regard the five lineages? If a person is destined to be without lineage, can they still generate bodhicitta?
Venerable: The Yogācāra school classifies lineages into five: śrāvaka, pratyekabuddha, bodhisattva, without lineage, and indeterminate. According to Yogācāra, the lineage determines future attainment. If one lacks the bodhisattva lineage, buddhahood is certainly hopeless. If one possesses the bodhisattva lineage, one's life starts from a higher point than that of the śrāvakas.
Although sentient beings are equal, the accumulations since beginningless time have indeed created differences in life's starting points. Some have deep roots of virtue; some have heavy obstacles and shallow wisdom; some are born with bodhisattva tendencies, enthusiastic about public welfare; others are naturally indifferent, unconcerned with society. But viewing the world through dependent origination, we should not understand these differences as fixed and unchanging. Therefore, I tend toward the view that all sentient beings can generate bodhicitta and all can be cultivated into the bodhisattva lineage. However, due to different starting points, the degree of difficulty will vary. For those who are eager to help others and full of compassion, bodhicitta aligns with their natural disposition and is relatively easy to generate. For those with cold and withdrawn temperaments, the difficulty of generating bodhicitta is naturally much greater. But as long as they make the effort with the right direction, they can ultimately achieve results.
Student: How should we decide between different altruistic actions? For example, if I have leftover cookies, should I feed them to fish or give them to a beggar? Some say that feeding fish does not create karma, while others lean toward giving to the beggar because a human birth is precious and closer to buddhahood than a fish.
Venerable: From the standpoint of the bodhicitta teachings, to say that we should first finish delivering human beings and only then begin to feel compassion for fish is itself incorrect. If that were the case, bodhicitta could never be perfected. Sentient beings are inexhaustible in number---when would we ever finish? Therefore, the key does not lie in the objective outcome of deliverance but in being full of compassion for every sentient being, never abandoning any one of them. Whether toward animals or humans, we must have the equally impartial mind of compassion---only such a mental state is perfect. If there is still a sense of higher and lower in the mind, what we ultimately develop can only be the unequal ordinary mind. The compassion of buddhas and bodhisattvas is uniformly equal: toward humans, it is one hundred percent; toward fish, it is also one hundred percent. Aspiration determines the final attainment---this point must be firmly kept in mind.
Of course, altruism also requires wisdom. In such a situation, who truly has the greater need? How can we distribute more reasonably? With wisdom, we will naturally know how to decide. According with sentient beings does not mean giving them whatever they want, still less following their desires, greed, hatred, and ignorance. We must consider whether it truly benefits them and use this as the criterion for choice. Therefore, in the practice of bodhicitta, first make the aspiration pure, and then decide with wisdom.
Student: What is the relationship between studying Madhyamaka and generating bodhicitta?
Venerable: The view of emptiness is an integral part of bodhicitta. The characteristics of bodhicitta---signlessness, selflessness, non-attainment, and so on---all belong to the scope of the view of emptiness. Without this understanding, bodhicitta can never be generated properly, nor can it be perfected. For bodhicitta is not a matter of words; it must be tested in reality. Why do we find it difficult to generate bodhicitta? Why do we feel resistance toward sentient beings? It is precisely because we perceive ourselves and sentient beings as solidly real, which creates opposition and discrimination. If we realize that all phenomena are signless, selfless, and unattainable, we can accept all sentient beings. Since self and other are one, generating altruistic bodhicitta is no longer a difficult matter.
The entire Tripiṭaka, all twelve divisions of the canon, and all Dharma gates of practice can be subsumed under bodhicitta and find their place in the process of cultivating bodhicitta. Thus, bodhicitta is the core of the Buddhadharma and can encompass all Mahayana Dharma gates.
Student: How should bodhicitta be brought into concrete reality?
Venerable: Although our current mental state is the ordinary mind, even at this level, if we have profound methods for working with the mind, we can still touch fundamental awakening. First, we must find the footing for our mental patterns. The footing of the ordinary mind is discrimination, grasping, and limitation. This needs to be adjusted, moving closer toward equality, signlessness, and boundlessness. Of course, doing this is indeed somewhat difficult, because the power of the ordinary mind is great. But do not let the mindset that "the bodhisattva path is hard, buddhahood is hard" take root---such fear of difficulty is a huge obstacle to generating aspiration.
In fact, every kind of mental power is built up through cultivation. Sand can be piled into a pagoda because of the accumulation of tiny grains. The Foolish Old Man could move mountains because of unremitting effort. One more key point: we must genuinely recognize the importance of bodhicitta, recognizing that it is the only way out in Buddhist study. Otherwise, let alone liberating sentient beings, we can barely take care of ourselves. Out of responsibility for our own life and compassion for sentient beings, we have no other choice but to give it our all. There are countless precedents for the perfection of bodhicitta. The buddhas as numerous as the Ganges' sands walked this path, and the great masters and patriarchs through the ages walked this path too.