Commit translated books batch0 and in-progress works

batch0-21/55/70/75/76/77/78/79/91: nine reviewed books — each with
source.dj, target.dj, edit-suggestions.dj, review-findings.dj and source
docx. All nine pass the 11-check translation gate; reviews applied in the
direct-edit pass on 2026-08-07 (bilingual.dj regenerated, not committed).

我们靠什么认识世界: incorporate human review into source/target; drop
stale review files.

第22课 传递善意,点亮心灯, 静心学堂学员手册: new in-progress projects.
This commit is contained in:
iacore
2026-08-08 12:54:18 +08:00
parent 63150a9f26
commit 7b92da7335
53 changed files with 15137 additions and 147 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
# Edit Suggestions for 净土法门与五大要素
Translator: AI
Reviewer: AI (self-review)
Date: 2026-08-06
## Summary
Translation is accurate and natural, with consistent terminology and good preservation of the speaker's voice. Two terminology issues found during self-review.
## Terminology Issues
### 1. Five essential elements enumeration — use noun forms
**Location:** Line 62 (target.dj), source line 62
**Source:** "皈依、发心、戒律、正见、止观"
**Current:** "taking refuge, aspiration, precepts, right view, and śamatha-vipaśyanā"
**Suggested:** "refuge, aspiration, precepts, right view, and śamatha-vipaśyanā"
**Reason:** Per the practice element list rule in mpi-translation skill: when translating lists of named practice components, render each as a noun phrase, not a gerund. "Refuge" not "taking refuge." The heading "Taking Refuge" is correct as a section title; only the enumeration in the element list needs the noun form.
**Applied:** Yes — changed target line 62.
### 2. "pessimistic" → "disengaged" for 消极
**Location:** Line 100 (target.dj), source line 100
**Source:** "大众觉得佛教是消极的,对社会没什么用处"
**Current:** "the public to perceive Buddhism as pessimistic and of no use to society"
**Suggested:** "the public to perceive Buddhism as disengaged and of no use to society"
**Reason:** 消极 in this context means "passive," "withdrawn," or "disengaged from worldly affairs" — not "pessimistic," which carries a specific philosophical connotation (pessimism vs. optimism) not present in the source. The sentence pairs 消极 with "of no use to society," so "disengaged" captures the intended meaning: a religion seen as withdrawing from rather than engaging with social concerns.
**Applied:** Yes — changed target line 100.
## Notes
- "self-centered streak" for 自了成分 is a deliberate choice: 自了 literally means "self-liberation focused," but "self-centered streak" better conveys the pejorative tone and flows more naturally in English. Not changed.
- "taking refuge" as section heading and in body text is correct; only the element-list enumeration needed the noun form.
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
# Review Findings for 净土法门与五大要素
Reviewer: AI
Date: 2026-08-07
Scope: Full review of target.dj against source.dj (accuracy, terminology, fluency, completeness)
## Summary
The translation is accurate, complete, and fluent throughout, with a consistent
terminology system (自我 grasping → "self-grasping", 凡夫心 → "ordinary mind", 觉性
→ "awakened nature", 串习 → "habitual patterns", 信愿行 → "faith, aspiration, and
practice", 三资粮 → "three provisions"). No source paragraph is omitted; no critical
mistranslations were found. Two major issues (both terminology) and a set of minor
issues are listed below.
Both items from edit-suggestions.dj were verified as applied: line 62 uses noun
forms ("refuge, aspiration, precepts, right view, and śamatha-vipaśyanā") and line
100 uses "disengaged" for 消极. No stale items.
## Critical
None.
## Major
### M1. 加行位 rendered "stage of earnest effort" — nonstandard term
**Location:** target.dj line 58, source line 58
**Source:** "所以教下的修行是从加行位、资粮位、见道位、修道位,直至究竟位。"
**Current:** "the path goes from the stage of earnest effort and the stage of
accumulation, through the stage of seeing and the stage of cultivation, all the way
to the ultimate stage"
**Issue:** 加行位 is the standard second of the five paths (pañcamārga), rendered
in English as the "path/stage of preparation" (or "application"). "Earnest effort"
is not a recognized rendering and will not be identified by readers of Buddhist
literature. Note also that the source lists 加行位 before 资粮位, reversing the
canonical order (资粮 accumulation → 加行 preparation); the translation mirrors the
source order, which is the correct editorial choice, but the term itself must be
standard.
**Fix:** Change "the stage of earnest effort and the stage of accumulation" to
"the stage of preparation and the stage of accumulation". Optionally add a
translator's note flagging that the source order differs from the canonical five-path
sequence.
### M2. 惑业 mistranslated and inconsistent — karma dropped at line 84
**Location:** target.dj line 84 (also lines 88, 90, 161 for the inconsistency)
**Source:** "就是深刻意识到轮回和惑业的过患" (line 84); elsewhere "以惑业为基础的
人生" (line 86), "解除惑业" (line 161)
**Current:** line 84: "the perils of samsara and the afflictions born of delusion";
lines 86/88 and 161: "deluded karma"
**Issue:** 惑业 is a technical compound — 惑 (affliction/delusion) + 业 (karma), the
two factors that drive samsara. Line 84's "the afflictions born of delusion" drops
业 entirely and reframes the compound as a single concept, while other passages
render it as the single noun phrase "deluded karma". The same term should not be
split two ways, and karma must not disappear from the sentence.
**Fix:** Render consistently as "delusion and karma" or "afflictions and karma".
Line 84: "the perils of samsara, with its afflictions and karma". Line 86: "a life
based on affliction and karma". Line 161: "dissolve affliction and karma".
## Minor
### m1. 万亿 understated as "millions and billions"
**Location:** target.dj line 46, source line 46
**Source:** "然后是百千次,万亿次......"
**Current:** "then hundreds and thousands of times, then millions and billions of
times..."
**Issue:** 万亿 = 10^12, i.e. trillions; "millions and billions" understates the
escalation.
**Fix:** "then hundreds and thousands of times, then trillions of times..."
### m2. 发心 ("Aspiration") collides with 愿 ("aspiration")
**Location:** target.dj lines 11 (TOC), 80 (heading), 82; collision with lines 90,
94, 96 (愿 rendered "aspiration")
**Issue:** The section title 发心 is rendered "Aspiration", while 愿 (as in 信愿行,
愿离娑婆) is also rendered "aspiration". In line 94 both senses appear in adjacent
sentences ("Aspiration is setting the mind..."), and a reader cannot tell 发心 from
愿. The body text manages the distinction, but the heading invites confusion.
**Fix:** Consider heading III as "Setting the Intention" or "Arousing the Mind"
(keeping "aspiration" for 愿). If "Aspiration" is retained, no change is strictly
required — the surrounding text disambiguates.
### m3. 万德洪名 rendered "greatly virtuous name"
**Location:** target.dj line 151, source line 151
**Source:** "不知道弥陀乃万德洪名"
**Current:** "without knowing that Amitābha is the greatly virtuous name"
**Issue:** 万德洪名 is a stock Pure Land epithet — "the august/great name of myriad
virtues". "Greatly virtuous name" is weak and reads as generic praise.
**Fix:** "without knowing that Amitābha is the great name of myriad virtues"
### m4. 同圆种智 rendered "share the same perfect wisdom"
**Location:** target.dj line 116, source line 116
**Source:** "就和十方诸佛同圆种智了"
**Current:** "you share the same perfect wisdom as all the Buddhas of the ten
directions"
**Issue:** 种智 (一切种智, sarvajñāna) is specifically omniscience/all-knowing
wisdom, the Buddha's distinctive knowledge. "Perfect wisdom" flattens this and
risks confusion with prajñā.
**Fix:** "you equally perfect omniscience with all the Buddhas of the ten
directions" or "you share the same all-knowing wisdom as the Buddhas of the ten
directions".
### m5. 西天 rendered "Western Paradise" — wrong connotation
**Location:** target.dj line 67, source line 67
**Source:** "学佛三年,佛在西天"
**Current:** "Practice three years --- the Buddha is off in the Western Paradise."
**Issue:** Here 西天 means the distant western heavens (India), i.e. the Buddha
receding ever farther away as faith fades. "Western Paradise" evokes the Pure Land
of Ultimate Bliss, a specific and unintended referent in a talk about Pure Land
practice.
**Fix:** "Practice three years --- the Buddha is far off in the west."
### m6. 光头俗汉 loses the pejorative
**Location:** target.dj line 29, source line 29
**Source:** "出家人不过是剃发染衣的光头俗汉"
**Current:** "they remain merely bald-headed laypeople in dyed robes"
**Issue:** 俗汉 ("worldly fellow") is derogatory; "laypeople" is neutral and
softens the rebuke. The point is that untransformed monastics are worldlings in
disguise.
**Fix:** "they remain nothing more than shaven-headed worldlings in dyed robes"
### m7. 相似的利他 rendered "apparent altruism" — ambiguous
**Location:** target.dj line 102, source line 102
**Source:** "必须是真正而非相似的利他。所谓相似的利他,就是……"
**Current:** "genuine and not merely apparent... What I call apparent altruism..."
**Issue:** 相似 here is the technical sense of "semblance/seeming" (as in 相似般若).
"Apparent" in English defaults to "obvious", nearly reversing the meaning.
**Fix:** "genuine and not merely seeming... What I call seeming altruism..." (or
"a semblance of altruism").
### m8. 心路规则 rendered "rules of the mental road" — awkward
**Location:** target.dj line 123, source line 123
**Source:** "戒律是修行过程中的心路规则"
**Current:** "The precepts are the rules of the mental road in the course of
practice."
**Issue:** "Rules of the mental road" is not idiomatic; the road-trip metaphor
("行驶在三善道") works better if introduced naturally.
**Fix:** "The precepts are the rules of the road for the mind in the course of
practice."
### m9. 三善道 rendered "three wholesome realms"
**Location:** target.dj line 123, source line 123
**Source:** "保护我们安全行驶在三善道"
**Current:** "protect us as we travel safely along the path of the three wholesome
realms"
**Issue:** 三善道 (gods, asuras, humans) is standardly "the three fortunate
rebirths/destinies". "Wholesome realms" blurs the rebirth-destination sense; the
parallel 三恶道 is elsewhere "the three lower realms" (lines 132, 141), which is
fine — but the pair should match.
**Fix:** "the three fortunate destinies" (and optionally align 三恶道 as "the three
unfortunate destinies", though "lower realms" is acceptable).
### m10. 救度 rendered "help" — too weak
**Location:** target.dj line 173, source line 173
**Source:** "怎么救度他们?"
**Current:** "How can we help them?"
**Issue:** 救度 is soteriological — to save/deliver beings. "Help" loses the
deliverance sense.
**Fix:** "How can we bring them to the Dharma?" or "How can we deliver them?"
### m11. 缘起 rendered inconsistently
**Location:** target.dj line 132 ("the empty nature of conditioned arising") vs
line 187 ("dependently arisen"); also "causes and conditions" at lines 44, 181
**Issue:** 缘起 shifts between "conditioned arising" and "dependent arising" within
one text. Both are standard, but one should be chosen.
**Fix:** Prefer "dependent arising"/"dependently arisen" throughout: line 132
"contemplating that dependent arising is empty by nature".
### m12. 见道位/修道位 mix "path" and "stage" in one sentence
**Location:** target.dj line 58, source line 58
**Current:** "realizing awakened nature through the path of seeing... During the
path of cultivation... through the stage of seeing and the stage of cultivation"
**Issue:** The same 位 is "path" in one clause and "stage" in the next.
**Fix:** Use "stage" (or "path") uniformly within the passage.
### m13. 横超 rendered inconsistently
**Location:** target.dj line 75 ("lead us directly beyond the three realms") vs
line 151 ("the shortcut directly transcending the three realms")
**Issue:** 横超三界 is a technical Pure Land expression (transverse/direct
transcendence of the three realms, vs. vertical exit through gradual attainment).
Two different renderings obscure that the same term is in play.
**Fix:** Unify, e.g. "lead us straight out of the three realms" / "the shortcut
straight out of the three realms", or keep "transcend the three realms directly" in
both places.
### m14. 在选择过程中 rendered "In the process of searching"
**Location:** target.dj line 73, source line 73
**Source:** "我们在选择过程中发现,唯有三宝才能让人走向解脱"
**Current:** "In the process of searching, we discover that only the Three Jewels
can lead us to liberation."
**Issue:** 选择 = choosing, not searching; the passage is about weighing options
(wealth, status), not seeking.
**Fix:** "In the process of choosing, we discover..."
### m15. Unmarked addition of Avataṃsaka attribution
**Location:** target.dj line 108, source line 108
**Source:** "我们知道,《行愿品》是关于菩提心教法的重要典籍"
**Current:** "the *Avataṃsaka Sūtra*'s 'Chapter on the Vows of Samantabhadra' is a
classic text..."
**Issue:** The attribution is factually correct (《普贤行愿品》 is the final chapter
of the Avataṃsaka), but it is an addition to the source. Given that the chapter
title is used bare later, a one-time gloss is helpful — but it should be marked as
a translator's clarification or trimmed.
**Fix:** Either "the 'Chapter on the Vows of Samantabhadra' (of the *Avataṃsaka
Sūtra*)" as an explicit gloss, or drop the attribution.
### m16. 心、佛、众生三无差别 paraphrased
**Location:** target.dj line 50, source line 50
**Source:** "正是在这个层面上说,心、佛、众生三无差别"
**Current:** "It is at this level that we say mind, Buddha, and sentient beings are
not three separate things."
**Issue:** "Not three separate things" suggests ontological merging; the formula
means there is no difference among the three. The standard rendering is well known.
**Fix:** "It is at this level that we say there is no difference among mind,
Buddha, and sentient beings."
### m17. Yogācārabhūmi quote: "for oneself" is interpretive
**Location:** target.dj line 96, source line 96
**Source:** "如是发心定自希求无上菩提,及求能作有情义利"
**Current:** "Such an aspiration is determined to seek unsurpassed bodhi for
oneself, and to seek the welfare of sentient beings."
**Issue:** 定自希求 is "certainly aspires" (定自 as an adverbial modifier), not
"seeks for oneself". The current reading is defensible as a contrast with
有情义利 but introduces a self/other split the grammar does not require.
**Fix:** "Such an aspirant surely seeks unsurpassed bodhi, and seeks to accomplish
the welfare of sentient beings."
## Completeness
Verified complete. All source sections are present in target.dj: title, dateline,
table of contents (all seven entries with matching anchors), opening remarks, the
six numbered sections, closing summary, all ten Q&A exchanges, and Master Da'an's
concluding remarks. Line alignment is 1:1 (195/195); no paragraph, quotation, or
list item was omitted, and no unmarked additions beyond m15 were found.
## Terminology Consistency (positive findings)
The following are rendered consistently and to standard; no action needed:
- 我执 → "self-grasping"; 法执 → "grasping at phenomena"
- 觉性 → "awakened nature"; 菩提心 → "bodhicitta" (愿菩提心 → "aspirational
bodhicitta", 世俗/胜义 → "conventional/ultimate")
- 串习 → "habitual patterns"; 相应 → "resonate/resonance"
- 信愿行 → "faith, aspiration, and practice"; 三资粮 → "three provisions"
- 出离心 → "renunciation"; 娑婆 → "Sahā world"; 极乐 → "Ultimate Bliss"
- 善知识 → "virtuous teacher"; 四众弟子 → "fourfold assembly"
- 戒定慧 → "precepts, concentration, and wisdom"; 正见 → "right view"
- 前行/正行 → "preparatory practice/main practice"; 他力 → "other-power"
- Quoted scriptures (*Platform Sutra*, *Śūraṅgama Sūtra*, *Yogācārabhūmi Śāstra*,
*Lamrim*, "Chapter on the Vows of Samantabhadra") are titled consistently and
quotations are faithful.
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
净土法门与五大要素
------2009年夏讲于庐山东林寺
济群法师
[一、学佛的重心 [2](#一学佛的重心)](#一学佛的重心)
[二、皈 依 [5](#二皈-依)](#二皈-依)
[三、发 心 [7](#三发-心)](#三发-心)
[四、戒 律 [11](#四戒-律)](#四戒-律)
[五、正 见 [12](#五正-见)](#五正-见)
[六、止 观 [13](#六止-观)](#六止-观)
[讲座问答 [13](#讲座问答)](#讲座问答)
尊敬的大安法师、各位法师和居士,早上好!
我一直想来朝拜净土祖庭东林寺,也通过各种渠道看到大安法师在轰轰烈烈地开展弘法事业,深深随喜。这次有缘前来,觉得名不虚传。佛法在世间的流传,所有寺院乃至出家人都是有责任的,所谓道在人弘,非道弘人。自古以来,寺院的职能无非是两方面:一是内修,成就四众弟子修行;二是外弘,面向社会大众弘扬佛法。只有每座道场都能立足于内修外弘的定位做好本分事,佛教才能健康发展,正法才能久住世间。东林寺在这两方面都做得很好,值得赞叹。
这几天寺院正在开展弘法辅导员培训班,我觉得很有意义。弘扬佛法不该只是少部分人的事,而是每一位佛子的责任所在。过去,我们仅仅指望高僧弘法,在家居士觉得,弘法是出家人的事;出家人觉得,弘法是高僧大德的事。问题是,高僧大德能有几个?当他们不堪重负,就没人弘法了。可见这种观念是有问题的。所以我提倡的是"弘扬佛法,人人有责”------每个佛教徒都有责任弘扬佛法,都应该尽到自己的力量。当然这并不是说每个人都要讲经说法,但可以根据自己的能力,以所知所学和大家分享,或是护持讲经、助印等弘法活动。只有让四众弟子意识到自身责任,积极参与到弘法队伍中,佛教才有希望。
当今教界最缺的是什么?很多富丽堂皇的寺院修起来了,但只是作为礼佛敬香的场所,甚至参观旅游的景点,却没有内修外弘的功能。大众来到这里,除了满足朝拜的需要,不过是参观建筑和造像,并没有因此对佛教有更多了解,更谈不上从中受益。为什么会这样?正是缺乏法的引导。
法,才是寺院的根本所在。内修,修的是法;外弘,弘的也是法。如果没有法的内涵,寺院不过是徒有其表的建筑,不能成为真正的道场;如果没有被戒定慧改造过,出家人不过是剃发染衣的光头俗汉,不能成为合格的僧宝;如果不能闻法、学法、依法修行,在家居士也不过是名义上的佛教徒,甚至会流于迷信。东林寺举办这样的活动,让更多佛子接受培训,提高弘法能力,意义重大。讲净土宗不是我的擅长,大安法师才是专家。在此,主要就我多年修学的心得和大家分享。
{#一学佛的重心}
## 一、学佛的重心
今天是一个网络时代,资讯空前发达,人心也空前混乱,以混乱的心面对混乱的资讯,势必带来选择上的混乱。学佛同样存在这个问题。现在我们有机会接触到各种法门和经论,但如果没有足够的见地作出判断,就会四处涉猎,莫衷一是。这正是很多人学佛多年依然不得要领的症结所在。
修行的关键是具足正见,善用其心。有了这两个前提,我们的闻思、实修、做事才能成为真正的修行,否则就可能流于形式。学教的容易夸夸其谈,用不起来;实修的容易盲修瞎炼,偏离方向;做事的容易被境所转,忘失初心。忙来忙去,自以为很精进,结果却和解脱毫不相干,何其可惜!
我们要明确学佛的重心在哪里,本立方可道生。这个重心又有内外之分。
外在的重心是以三宝为依托,以此引导我们走出混乱的心行轨道。否则,多半会跟着感觉走。这个感觉是什么?无非是我执,是贪嗔痴,跟着这样的感觉,生命是没有出路的。所以我们要至诚皈依三宝,从唯我独尊转向以三宝为尊。对于修学净土法门来说,就是以阿弥陀佛为依止,由净念相继,而与弥陀心心相印。这种转换代表真正学佛的开始,也意味着生命轨道的改变。以自我为中心,将在六道随业流转,无尽轮回;只有以三宝为中心,才能走向解脱,成就菩提。
内在的重心就是我们自己。也就是说,所有修学都是帮助我们解决自身问题。三藏十二部典籍、八万四千法门都是为认识和改造自己服务的。当然,这和上面所说的以自我为中心完全不同,前者是随顺现有的凡夫心,而后者是开发自身本具的觉性,这才是生命的真正宝藏。
我们每天会有很多想法,包括工作、学习、家庭等等。这些念头是缘起的,代表无尽生命的积累。问题是,它们往往是由贪嗔痴驱动,在不知不觉中形成的。贪的时候,不由自主就贪了,没想过这么做对不对,也没想过是否还有其他选择,只是惯性使然。可以说,贪嗔痴早已成为凡夫的本能,如果不加改变,我们的所思所想必然是在随顺贪嗔痴,强化贪嗔痴。
修行,就是要消除妄念,建立正念。念佛之所以天天念,时时念,就是为了串习正念。我们选择弥陀名号为所缘,然后安住于此,念念相续。念一声佛,有关阿弥陀佛的正念就得到一次重复和强化,然后是百千次,万亿次......在不断忆念的过程中,这个念头就会日益壮大。相应的,其他妄念就会失去现行机会,从而不断弱化。
但仅仅念还不够,关键是全身心地念,以对弥陀的至诚归投之心在念,以离娑婆、生净土的愿心在念。我们的心力越强,投入的心灵能量越大,念头得到的滋养就越多,成长也越快。如果只是有口无心地念着,虽然口中在发声,手上也在拨着念珠,内心依然妄念纷飞,其实是没什么力量的。所以我们在念佛过程中,一定要深刻意识到其中的重要性,用心忆念,才能形成强大的正念,成为心灵世界的主导。如果正念没有力量,主导我们的依然会是妄念,是贪嗔痴。
凡夫多半活在妄心的世界,颠倒梦想,念念无明。但佛法告诉我们,在妄心背后还有真心,那就是觉性,是成佛潜质。这两种心正是凡圣不同生命品质的基础。在常人看来,凡夫和圣者有着天壤之别,可在禅宗见地上,不过是一念之差,所谓"前念迷即众生,后念悟即是佛”。迷失觉性,即是众生;体认觉性,当下就是佛。当然,这个佛和圆满悲智功德的十方诸佛是有差别的,但从体认到的觉性来说是一样的,差别在于是否圆满。正是在这个层面上说,心、佛、众生三无差别。
《坛经》还告诉我们,"前念著境即烦恼,后念离境即菩提。”我们为什么著境?因为妄心是有粘性的,而且将一大堆错误想法和混乱情绪当作是"我”,发展出现有的凡夫心。当这样的心遇到境,自然会粘著其上,起贪起嗔。事实上,这个"我”只是无明的产物,是幻有的。这就使得我们必须四处寻找支撑,不断地证明它,强化它,痛苦、生死和轮回由此而来。
而在觉性层面,没有任何需要,也没有随之而来的恐惧、孤独乃至一切烦恼。因为觉性本身有无住的特点,就像镜子,虽能照见山河大地,但物来影现,物去影灭,没有任何染著,是为离境。这也就是《楞严经》所说的"觉明虚静犹如晴空,无复粗重前尘影事,观诸世间大地河山如镜鉴明”。
净土宗的"即心念佛,即心是佛”,正是依觉性而建立。在这个见地上,佛和众生有相同的本质,所以念佛的心当下就是佛。但要知道,这绝不是凡夫的妄心。我们通过学佛了解自己,看到现有人格是无明的产物,目的就是为了瓦解它,进而体认隐藏在凡夫心背后的觉性------这正是解脱的力量。
佛法所说的明心见性,就是由见道体认觉性。但这并不是结束,还要在修道过程中不断运用觉性,瓦解串习。所以教下的修行是从加行位、资粮位、见道位、修道位,直至究竟位。当凡夫心彻底瓦解,智慧究竟圆满,才能最终成就佛果。对于净土法门的修行来说,就是"花开见佛悟无生”。和其他法门的主要区别在于,净土法门偏向他力。虽说惑业尚未断尽,但可借助弥陀愿力的接引,带业往生西方,在清净的环境中继续修行,不必担心在轮回中退转。这是净土法门的殊胜所在。
但我们还要知道,走出轮回的关键不在于时空,而是解除内心的迷惑烦恼,解除对自己和世界的错误认定。这才是轮回的真正根源。事实上,心既能制造生死和痛苦,也具备自我解脱的能力。我们要去了解这种能力,找到打开它的钥匙。三藏十二部典籍,南传、藏传、汉传三大语系,净土、禅宗、天台等八大宗派、种种法门,都是佛陀针对不同根机者施设的方便善巧。
但对个人修行来说,重要的并不是知道各个法门的差异,而是了解其中的共同核心。现在很多人之所以修不上去,正是忽略基础导致的。根据多年修学,我发现不同法门虽各有侧重,但都离不开"皈依、发心、戒律、正见、止观”五大要素。抓住这些纲领,也就抓住了修行根本。反之,忽略其中任何一点,修行必然是不完整的。其中,前三点是一切宗派的共同基础,后两项则是不同宗派的特色所在。
{#二皈-依}
## 二、皈 依
学佛首先要皈依,这是区别佛教徒和非佛教徒的关键。现在教界普遍存在信仰淡化的问题,换言之,就是信仰在内心没有足够的地位和分量,无法镇住凡夫心。刚开始,我们觉得自己在信佛,渐渐地,还是像以往一样信钞票,信地位,信感情,信孩子,信人际关系,信有权就是一切。为什么会这样?就是因为我们对信仰对象缺乏认识,对三宝和修行找不到感觉。当信仰不能成为内心主导,自然会被边缘化,出现"学佛一年,佛在眼前;学佛两年,佛在大殿;学佛三年,佛在西天”的现象。如果不加调整,佛菩萨就会渐行渐远,远在天边。
所以我从2004年开始就把弘扬皈依作为重点,在《皈依修学手册》中详细阐述了"皈依三宝在修学佛法中的地位、皈依之因和皈依的选择、认识三宝、如何皈依、皈依的正行、皈依的学处、皈依的利益、皈依的修习”等问题,希望帮助大家深化对三宝的认识,真正了解为什么要皈依,怎样才能如法皈依。此外,还编写《皈依修习仪轨》,推广皈依共修,希望大家把忆念三宝作为日常定课,通过反复修习,强化三宝在心目中的分量。
信仰阿弥陀佛,修习净土法门,同样要建立在皈依三宝的基础上。我们在十方诸佛中选择阿弥陀佛为归宿,是皈依佛;依止净土法门修行,是皈依法;选择净宗历代祖师大德为师长和修学楷模,是皈依僧。可以说,皈依代表人生最重要的选择。
当我们意识到内心的困惑、生死的痛苦、轮回的过患,怎样才能解脱?财富可以让人解脱吗?地位可以让人解脱吗?我们在选择过程中发现,唯有三宝才能让人走向解脱。虽然这是我们自己的选择,是出于精神的需要,但除了信仰之外,人生还有感情、权力、人际关系等种种需要,要让信仰在内心占据主导地位,并非易事。在此过程中,必须不断深化对三宝功德的认识,不断修习皈依。否则的话,这一信仰就会因为得不到强化而被逐渐弱化。
对于净土学人来说,修习皈依的重点,就是认识到阿弥陀佛的大愿,西方极乐世界的殊胜,认识到念佛可以引领我们横超三界,出离轮回。具备这些认识,才能全身心地投入。如果认识不到其中分量,心很容易被现实的需要带走。所以我们要强化三宝在心目中的地位,至诚皈依阿弥陀佛,不断思维念佛对人生的重要性。如果不做这样的观察修,要把这句"阿弥陀佛”念好,是很不容易的。
净土法门的三资粮为信、愿、行。首先就要有信。信什么?凭什么去信?如果对这些问题缺乏认识,就是迷信、盲信,是没有力量的。确实有些人信根极利,听到善知识怎么说,就能生起深信切愿,一门深入地照做,并不需要懂得多少道理。但对多数受过现代教育的人来说,如果没有理性思考,很难真正生起信心。更何况,仅仅生起是不够的,还要进一步强化,让信心成长壮大,就像参天大树那样,才能在充满串习、妄念的动荡内心安住。所以说,皈依是我们走出轮回的起点,也是往生净土的保障。
{#三发-心}
## 三、发 心
发心并不是学佛的专利,事实上,我们每天都在发心,只不过发的是贪嗔痴,最终成就的是凡夫人格。现在我们深刻意识到这种人格的过患,就要从发心开始调整,将凡夫心转变为出离心和菩提心。
所谓出离心,就是深刻意识到轮回和惑业的过患,发愿摆脱这种状态。对今天的人来说,逃避痛苦的方法似乎比以往任何时代更多。虽说我们活得并不轻松,压力重重,却很善于通过各种方式逃避,甚至沉溺在虚拟世界中,不愿面对现实。事实上,逃避是不解决任何问题的,虚拟世界更不是久留之地,只要内心还有烦恼,就会不断地制造问题,制造痛苦。
我们不断改善环境,目的就是缓解痛苦,可同时也带来了新的问题。比如我们需要汽车代步,赚钱买了车,暂时开心一下,但和汽车有关的麻烦也会随之而来。在以惑业为基础的人生中,不可能有本质的快乐,有的只是对痛苦的暂时缓解。所谓本质的快乐,就是无论什么时候享受,也无论享受多长时间,它都是快乐的,不会减少,更不会乐极生悲。只有涅槃才是那样的快乐,而以惑业为基础的快乐,都不具备有这些特点。
我们唯有深刻意识到轮回本质是痛苦的,才能对轮回盛事不再有任何期盼,真切地生起出离心。否则的话,今天觉得诸事不顺,赶快到寺院念佛修行,似乎什么都可以放下;一旦顺境来了,又义无反顾地投入红尘中,照样什么都放不下。那不是出离心,只是暂时的厌离和逃避。
事实上,出离心是一种智慧、积极、勇敢的选择,是认清生命真相后,以慧剑斩断对世间名利、事业、感情的执著。进而以大丈夫的气概精进修行,忍人所不能忍,行人所不能行。只有这样,解脱才有希望,往生才有把握。因为你对世间种种已不再贪恋,也就不会为其左右,为其干扰。念佛往生必须有信、愿、行,这个愿就是"愿离娑婆,愿生净土”。如果没有强烈的出离愿望,对世间尚存贪恋,怎么能往生净土?
只有作出明确选择------西方极乐世界就是我的归宿,只有那里是唯一的家,除此以外,不想去任何地方。同时深信阿弥陀佛慈悲接引的大愿,加上一心念佛、积极利他的修行资粮,必定往生。关键是很多人信不纯、愿不够、行不足,虽然表面看起来每天都在念佛,但内心还是有很多牵挂,觉得福报还没享够,在面临诱惑时就会被其他选择所吸引,在生死关头就会被轮回盛事挂碍,怎么可能往生?
所以信和愿非常重要。其中,信是皈依,选择自己的依止和归宿;愿是发心,生起真切的出离轮回之心。而菩提心是出离心的延伸和圆满,把"我要出离轮回”的愿望延伸到一切众生身上。不仅自己出离,还要推己及人,不忍众生在轮回中受苦,发愿带领他们共同解脱。这种广泛利他的行为就是菩萨行,不仅能成就慈悲,还能成就智慧。这正是佛菩萨所成就的两大品质。菩萨又叫觉有情,就是令有情觉悟。如果仅仅想着自己出离,只能成就解脱,是声闻乘而非菩萨道的修行。
作为一种崇高的利他主义愿望,菩提心的特点在于希求,即《瑜伽师地论》所说的"如是发心定自希求无上菩提,及求能作有情义利,是故发心以定希求为其行相”。从希求的角度来说,这和"我要买房子,要买汽车”的用心方式是同样的,区别只是在于愿望的内容。常人的希求是出于欲望,属于众生的本能,而菩提心的希求是为了利他,是"我要利益一切众生,帮助众生解除轮回痛苦”的愿心。
这就带来一个问题:为什么要利他?众生和我有什么关系?现实生活中,我们对很多众生是没感觉,甚至不喜欢的,怎么说服自己去利益他们?这是发菩提心的难点所在,必须从观念和心态来调整。省庵大师的《劝发菩提心文》中,讲到发菩提心的十个理由。当我们通过反复思维,认识到这些理由是正确的,这么做是有意义的,才能由衷地发起菩提心。宗喀巴大师的《道次第》中,则是通过七因果和自他相换,阐述了为什么要发菩提心和怎样发心的方法。当我们接受这些认识,也就接受了这种选择。
我们通常觉得,发菩提心只是一种利他行,和慈悲有关,和个人解脱没有必然的关系,所以老实念佛就够了,为什么要帮助别人,做种种利他行,不是浪费时间吗?这就使得很多学佛人在行为上有浓厚的自了成分,也使大众觉得佛教是消极的,对社会没什么用处。原因就在于,我们对利他的认识严重不足。
事实上,利他不仅能长养慈悲,和解脱也关系密切。我们现有的人格,乃至烦恼、生死、轮回,都是以我执为基础的。有些人虽然在念佛,但没有正确发心,一心只是为了自己,所以碰到一点不如意的事,和自己抵触的事,还是会生起种种烦恼,根源正是在于我执。如果每天总想着自己,就会使我执不断得到强化。而利他的修行恰恰可以弱化我执,把对自己的关注转向众生,多想众生一分,相应的,就会少想自己一分。但这么做的前提,必须是真正而非相似的利他。所谓相似的利他,就是通过利他善行,使我执变得更高尚。用社会上的话来说,就是作秀式的善行。如果这样的话,利他将成为增长我执的另一种方式。
发菩提心必须是纯粹的利他,不论动机还是行为,完全以利益众生为目的,没有丝毫为了自己。当一个人处处为自己打算时,才会患得患失,烦恼重重。反之,当一个人全心全意地想他人所想,做他人需要的事,其实是没时间为自己烦恼的。这么做的过程中,我执自然会被弱化,从而在根本上扫除解脱的障碍。
从另一个角度来说,我们虽然有悲悯心,但非常狭隘。在修利他行的过程中,时时想着利益一切众生,心量就会不断打开,慈悲也会得到增长,所以菩提心和修习慈悲是相辅相成的。
我们知道,《行愿品》是关于菩提心教法的重要典籍,也是净土五经之一。经中告诉我们:"诸佛如来以大悲心而为体故,因于众生而起大悲,因于大悲生菩提心,因菩提心成等正觉。”以慈悲为前提,才能生起菩提心,而菩提心又能进一步成就慈悲心。圆满的慈悲是平等、无限的,这离不开智慧。所以从修行上说,利他有两方面的意义:一是利益众生,成就慈悲;一是开启智慧,导向解脱。因为有菩提心,才能使智慧和慈悲不断增长,最终圆满佛菩萨那样的大智慧和大慈悲。
如果我们以菩提心修净土法门,可以成为往生的重要资粮,并在往生后由此愿心引导,在十方世界度化众生。正如《行愿品》所说的那样,当人临命终时,"唯此愿王不相舍离,于一切时引导其前。一刹那中即得往生极乐世界,到已即见阿弥陀佛......其人自见生莲华中,蒙佛授记;得授记已,经于无数百千万亿那由他劫,普于十方不可说不可说世界,以智慧力随众生心而为利益。不久当坐菩提道场,降伏魔军,成等正觉,转妙法轮。能令佛刹极微尘数世界众生发菩提心,随其根性,教化成熟,乃至尽于未来劫海,广能利益一切众生。”
为什么《行愿品》被称为"十大愿王”?因为其中的每个愿力都是以十方三世诸佛,以尽虚空、遍法界的众生为所缘。虽然不少人把《行愿品》作为早晚功课,但重点只是念诵,却不了解其中蕴含着殊胜的修行方法。我在1996年就讲过《行愿品》,后整理成《学佛者的信念》,其后又多次宣讲《普贤行愿品的观修原理》。之所以重视这部经典,因为其中阐述的修行原理,不仅可以作为修习其他法门的前行,本身也是正行,是普贤菩萨成佛的法门。
从前行的角度,《行愿品》的观修可以使我们快速集资净障,是成佛的第一生产力。以《行愿品》的方法念一句"阿弥陀佛”,或是修任何善行,念和行的当下就是一切。就像任何数字乘以无限,结果都是无限的。同时,《行愿品》也是至高的正行,是建立在华严见地的基础上。《华严经》历来被称为经中之王,它的修行就是导归普贤行愿。我在讲述《普贤行愿品的观修原理》时,将其中的修行方法总结为------菩提心的无上观修,佛陀品质的临摹方法。我们知道练书法要临摹字帖,如果按《行愿品》的引导去观修,去念佛,就是在用自己的心临摹佛陀品质,进而调整到佛菩萨那样的心。
为什么我们可以把心调整到佛菩萨那样的频道?因为在生命的某个层面,众生和佛菩萨是无二无别的。只是我们因无明而迷失,落入自我制造的陷阱,才成了凡夫。在临摹过程中,就是逐步撤除自我的设定和局限。当这些障碍被彻底铲除,证悟无我、无相、无限的心,就和十方诸佛同圆种智了。如果我们内心不具有成佛潜质,是成不了佛的。正因为众生本具如来智慧德相,才能通过修行成就。
菩提心有世俗菩提心和胜义菩提心之分。前面所说的愿菩提心,只是世俗菩提心,而胜义菩提心则是我们内在觉醒的心。这才是究竟的,是生命内在的无价之宝,也是一切众生本自具足的。作为佛弟子,不论修习什么法门,最终都是为了认识觉醒的心,成就解脱乃至无上菩提。
{#四戒-律}
## 四、戒 律
戒律是修行过程中的心路规则,作用是帮助我们止息轮回串习,保护我们安全行驶在三善道,行驶在解脱道和菩萨道。它的首要原则是"诸恶莫作”,而恶的基础是贪嗔痴。这是生命内在的强大串习,如果不刻意防范,很容易为其左右。只有不陷入串习,我们才有力量安住正念,修习正定,开启内在觉性。
戒具有防非止恶的力量,如果我们受戒时发心正确,仪式如法,就能因此获得戒体,在内心建立自制力和防范系统。但这不是受了就一劳永逸的,还要通过不断持戒和忆念戒的功德来强化,需要把戒律落实到身口意,落实到修行和生活的方方面面,最终使持戒成为我们的修养。这样才能抵挡无始以来的不良串习,使身心乃至人格清净无染。
如果不以戒律为规范,我们的所思、所言、所行往往是充满贪嗔痴的。在这样的心行基础上,能和阿弥陀佛的愿力相应吗?如果不能相应,所谓的念,不过是有口无心的形式而已,无法成为往生资粮。所以对于念佛法门来说,戒律也是不可或缺的基础。
{#五正-见}
## 五、正 见
从念佛来说,除了净土法门特有的见地,我们还要重视各宗共同的正见。如念轮回苦、三恶道苦,可以帮助我们真切地发起出离心,断除贪嗔痴,也就是四谛法门说的,由知苦而能断集、慕灭、修道。可以说,念苦正是修行的动力所在。无常无我是告诉我们,从外在世界到内在身心都是刹那生灭、朝不保夕的。只有认识妄心背后的觉性,才能亲见生命的本来面目。缘起性空则是帮助我们认识到,无明构建的轮回只是梦境,是因缘假相,并不真实,也就是祖师所说的"梦里明明有六趣,觉后空空无大千”。我们觉得这个世界很热闹,很可爱,所以才不想出离。如果看清它在本质上是荒谬而不真实的,也就没必要执著不舍了。
我们修念佛法门,必须深刻认识到轮回本质是痛苦的,认识到阿弥陀佛的万德庄严,认识到西方净土的无比殊胜。具足这些正见,才能全身心投入,让这句佛号念得得力,念得相应。我们的见地越高,念佛时和阿弥陀佛的相应程度就越高,往生的可能性就越高,往生后的品位也越高。如果带着凡夫心在念,既没有见地,也没有出离心和菩提心,不过是在念一些音节而已,自己都没有入心,还能和弥陀心心相印吗?
{#六止-观}
## 六、止 观
凡夫心是很不安静的,即使没有面对其他人和事的时候,念头也会此起彼伏。这就需要通过制心一处的训练,让心系念于善所缘。一旦跑开,就再拉回来;再跑开,就再拉回来。通过反复训练,逐步平息躁动,培养持续、稳定的专注。当我们体认到这种安静后,无论面对什么,都是如如不动的,不会随境左右。
以大家熟悉的念佛来说,把心安住在佛号上就是止。在这个基础上,每一声佛号才能真正念得相应,念得有力。而观是一种观照力,在念佛过程中了了分明。如何让念佛和止观修行相结合?首先要有前行,思维暇满义大,念死无常,念三恶道苦,并且深刻认识到阿弥陀佛和西方净土的殊胜,生起"愿离娑婆,愿生极乐”的强烈愿心。然后通过修止,专心念佛,让这一正念逐渐强大,相续不断,成为生命的主导力量。最后通过观禅,观照念佛的心本空,念佛的心即是佛,也就是祖师所说的"即心念佛,即心是佛”。如此念佛,就能念念与佛相应,是至高无上的修行。
以上,围绕修学重点和五大要素,给大家介绍了我的修学思考。我觉得,这五大要素对念佛法门也很有借鉴意义。今天的因缘非常殊胜,希望我的心得能对大家有所启发。
## 讲座问答
问:禅宗的闻思修,和净土法门的信愿行有何关系?
答:闻思修主要是教下的内容,并不是禅宗特别提倡的。当然禅宗也讲藉教悟宗,以闻思经教辅助修行,但不是重点。教下所说的闻思修,闻是亲近善知识,听闻正法;思是如理思维;修是按如理思维建立的正见修习某个法门,并在正见指导下生活。
净土法门的信愿行,同样离不开闻思修的基础。否则我们连阿弥陀佛和净土法门都不知道,信什么?即使听说了一点,但不知道弥陀乃万德洪名,净土法门乃横超三界的捷径,还是难以生起信心。即使知道了弥陀功德和念佛殊胜,但不通过思维来理解、接受,不通过修行来验证,信心依然是不坚定的。所以说,闻思修是建立信愿行不可或缺的基础。离开这个基础说信愿行,往往是空洞的。
问:无明和执著有什么不同?根本无明、枝末无明和我法二执是什么关系?
答:无明是执著的基础。我们之所以执著,正是因为无明。当然无明的表现方式有很多,贪嗔痴、八万四千烦恼都是无明的结果,执著是其中一项重要内容。
根本无明也叫无始无明,是与生俱来的,枝末无明则是由根本无明派生的。至于我法二执,其实也是无明的表现。在《道次第》中,甚至把我执和无明说成一体的两面,由无明而有我执,有法执。因为我们看不清自己,所以才会对自己产生错误认定,为我执;对世界产生错误认定,为法执。如果我们看得清自己和世界,对一切洞然明白,就不再有错误认定,也不再有我法二执了。
问:出离心和菩提心是什么关系?
答:从愿望本身来说,出离心和菩提心是一致的,都是要出离轮回,但所缘对象有宽窄不同。出离心只是"我要出离”的愿望,而菩提心不仅是自己出离,还要带领一切众生出离。从心行基础来说,二者也是一致的。真正的出离心是空性慧的作用,而菩提心的基础也是空性慧。如果没有空性慧,仅仅建立于世俗心的愿望,是无法究竟出离并解除惑业的。从世俗层面上说,出离心和菩提心都是愿望;从究竟本质上说,二者都是空性慧,都是觉悟。佛教所说的觉悟,不仅有诸佛菩萨成就的无上菩提,还有声闻菩提、缘觉菩提。
问:当代佛教的发展方向如何,是趋向人间佛教还是山林佛教?
答:佛教的发展不能单纯走向人间,也不能都走入山林,否则谁来弘扬佛法?这么多芸芸众生怎么办?从另一个角度说,如果没有社会大众的土壤,也就失去佛陀设教的本意,佛教将无以生存。而在走向人间的同时,也离不开山林的静修。
静修可以直面自己,做事可以历境炼心。东林寺的闭关中心就很好,我们定期到这里来修一修,再到红尘中滚一滚,这两方面对修行都有必要。做事是修习菩提心的过程,可以通过利他来瓦解串习,同时考察自己:正念有没有力量?贪嗔痴还强不强?如果有任何一件事可以影响我们,就说明内心还有相应的烦恼在作用,正是修行的入手处。否则的话,这个世界没有任何境界会影响我们。
问:末法时期为什么要提倡净土法门?为什么众生的根机最适合净宗,而不是禅宗、密宗?
答:佛法弘扬应该是多元的。当然,净土法门在中国有广泛的信众群体,需要像东林寺这么好的道场来弘扬,但其他宗派同样重要。佛陀之所以施设八万四千法门,就是因为众生有各种根机。尤其在今天这个多元的社会,各个宗派都有存在价值。如果净宗道场把净土宗弘扬好,禅宗道场把禅宗弘扬好,唯识宗道场把唯识宗弘扬好,就是众生之福。因为众生的根机不同,需要不同法门来引导和摄受,佛教才能全面、健康地发展。所以,我并不提倡只弘扬一个宗派。任何道场能如理如法地弘扬某个宗派,都值得随喜赞叹。
问:很多学佛人只求眼前福报,觉得净土或佛是看不见的,怎么救度他们?
答:确实有些学佛者只求眼前福报,这需要有针对性地引导。从现代人所受的教育来说,直接和他们说轮回,说西方极乐世界,接受起来会有困难,甚至觉得这是迷信。在这种情况下,我们可以多向他们介绍人间佛教------你想不想这一生过得好?过得开心?佛教是人生的大智慧,可以引导我们解除烦恼,使当下的生活更幸福。当他们愿意接受佛法后,可以再进一步讲出离心、菩提心、西方净土等高深的道理。
佛陀说法时,也常常"先说端正法,再说正法要”。众生想要福报,就说怎么拥有福报。当他们有了福报之后,感觉光有福报还不行,再来说佛法,就容易接受了。就像很多人没钱时以为有钱就有一切,结果有钱后发现还是痛苦,就会寻找新的解决办法。现在的国学热、佛学热就说明了这一点。因为很多人已不满足于现前福报,开始思考"幸福是什么”,思考"我是谁”"活着为什么”。当他们开始追问这些问题,再来介绍佛法,就是顺其所思、予其所需、投其所好,效果自然不同。
问:如何将佛法落实到生活中?
答:一方面,要让佛法智慧真正变成你的观念。对于佛法所说的暇满人身、无常无我、因缘因果,我们在听闻后,还要通过深入思维来理解。当我们认识到佛法所说的就是世间真理,才能心悦诚服地接纳,成为自己的观念。这样的话,佛法自然能落实到生活中。很多人虽然在学佛法,知道不少道理,但面对问题时,运用的还是固有观念,"佛法是佛法,我还是我”。之所以有这种知行脱节的情况,其实就在于没有真正的"知”,没有把概念转变成观念。
另一方面,要根据佛陀所说建立如法、健康的生活规范。依戒定慧、八正道的指导,受持戒律,正命生活;同时每天有一定时间来禅修或念佛,保持智慧观照。做到这些的话,佛法一定能走入生活。
问:对父母的执著太深,如何才能看淡?
答:执著是凡夫的串习,尤其是对父母,关系最为密切,执著也最为坚固。如何解决这个问题?一方面是从轮回的眼光,认识到我们和父母的关系也是缘起的,同时认识到,执著这种关系不能给双方带来任何好处,只有引导父母学佛,把世俗关系转为清净的法缘,才是最好的报恩。另一方面,要把感情的重点转移到信仰上,从以自我为中心转向以三宝为中心,可以弱化对世间感情的执著。我们修净土法门,就要对阿弥陀佛、极乐世界建立依赖。
当然也要注意方式方法。有些人学佛后,就不管家庭、不做事业,最后反而给自己带来诸多违缘。作为在家居士来说,我们要完成世俗责任,做父母的当好父母,做子女的当好子女,也就是印光大师所说的敦伦尽分。在和家人相处的过程中,既是在完成责任,也可以修习菩提心。我们要慈悲一切众生,首先应该从父母、兄弟姐妹开始。如果对身边亲人都不慈悲,怎么慈悲众生?当然,这不是用人间情爱,而是用慈悲大爱,先从至亲开始,然后扩充到更多的人。只要带着菩提心去做,这些努力同样会成为往生净土的资粮,和修行并不对立。
## 大安法师结束语
大家听了济群法师的开示,相信会受到很大的教育。本人也受益良多,感觉法师真是把高深的佛法,用大家都能理解的现代语言阐释得非常到位。对于净土行人来说,通途的持戒、菩提心、正见和念佛法门有什么关系,法师也讲得很好,让人想到蕅益大师所说的,净土法门"横与一切法门浑同,竖与一切法门迥异”。有时我们更强调迥异的一面,而忘记浑同的一面。实际上,浑同的部分是基础。不是说你念佛了,仰靠他力了,大乘通途的菩萨道就可以置之不理。在念佛过程中,我们要重视通途的科目菩提道的基础,而在往生这一点上全凭他力。这样修净土法门才会比较圆融。
济群法师所讲的佛教多元化发展的观点也很好。八万四千法门,是面对种种不同根机的众生而施设。每个道场都有各自的修学定位,可以发挥特有风格,让大乘八宗都能开花结果,利益众生。站在东林寺的定位,我们专修专弘净土法门,但对禅宗、律宗和教下的道场,我们要随喜赞叹。具有这样的认知和胸怀,才能共持法运。希望大家听闻之后深入思维,落实在行动中。
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
The Pure Land Method and the Five Essential Elements
------A talk given at Donglin Temple on Mount Lu, summer 2009
Venerable Master Jiqun
[I. The Focus of Buddhist Practice [2](#一学佛的重心)](#一学佛的重心)
[II. Taking Refuge [5](#二皈-依)](#二皈-依)
[III. Aspiration [7](#三发-心)](#三发-心)
[IV. Precepts [11](#四戒-律)](#四戒-律)
[V. Right View [12](#五正-见)](#五正-见)
[VI. Śamatha-Vipaśyanā [13](#六止-观)](#六止-观)
[Q&A Session [13](#讲座问答)](#讲座问答)
Venerable Master Da'an, Dharma masters, and lay practitioners, good morning!
I have long wished to pay homage at Donglin Temple, the ancestral seat of the Pure Land tradition. I have also followed, through various channels, how Master Da'an has been vigorously carrying out the work of spreading the Dharma, and I deeply rejoice in this. Now that this karmic connection has brought me here, I can say the temple fully lives up to its reputation. In this world, every monastery and every monastic bears a responsibility for the transmission of the Buddha Dharma. As the saying goes, the path is propagated by people, not people by the path. From ancient times, monasteries have served two functions: inward cultivation, supporting the practice of the fourfold assembly, and outward propagation, bringing the Dharma to society at large. Only when every practice center grounds itself in this dual role of inner cultivation and outer propagation, and does its proper work, can Buddhism develop in a healthy way and the true Dharma endure in the world. Donglin Temple has done well on both fronts and deserves our admiration.
In recent days the temple has been holding a training workshop for Dharma propagation instructors, which I find very meaningful. Spreading the Buddha Dharma should not be the work of a small minority --- it is the responsibility of every Buddhist disciple. In the past, we pinned our hopes solely on eminent monks to propagate the Dharma. Lay practitioners felt that propagation was the monastics' job; monastics felt that propagation was the job of eminent monks and great masters. The problem is, how many eminent monks and great masters are there? When they are overburdened, no one is left to propagate the Dharma. Clearly, this mindset is flawed. That is why I advocate: "To spread the Buddha Dharma, everyone has a part to play" --- every Buddhist has a responsibility to propagate the Dharma and should contribute what they can. This does not mean everyone must give lectures on sutras. You can share what you have learned and understood according to your ability, or support propagation activities by assisting with Dharma talks, sponsoring sutra printing, and so on. Only when the fourfold assembly recognizes its own responsibility and takes an active part in the propagation effort can Buddhism have a future.
What is most lacking in today's Buddhist world? Many magnificent temples have been built, yet they serve merely as places to offer incense and pay homage to the Buddha, or even as tourist attractions, without the functions of inner cultivation and outer propagation. When people come here, apart from satisfying their need to worship, they do little more than admire the architecture and statues. They do not gain a deeper understanding of Buddhism, let alone real benefit. Why is this? Precisely because of a lack of guidance through the Dharma.
The Dharma is the very foundation of a monastery. Inner cultivation means cultivating the Dharma; outer propagation means propagating the Dharma. Without the substance of the Dharma, a monastery is nothing more than an impressive building and cannot become a genuine place of practice. If the monastics have not been transformed by precepts, concentration, and wisdom, they remain nothing more than shaven-headed worldlings in dyed robes, not qualified members of the Sangha jewel. And if lay practitioners cannot hear, study, and practice the Dharma, they remain Buddhists in name only, and may even drift into superstition. That Donglin Temple is holding events like this --- enabling more disciples to receive training and strengthen their capacity to spread the Dharma --- is enormously significant. Teaching the Pure Land school is not my specialty; Master Da'an is the expert. Here, I will mainly share insights I have gathered from my own years of study and practice.
{#一学佛的重心}
## I. The Focus of Buddhist Practice
We live in an internet age, with an unprecedented flood of information and unprecedented turmoil in people's minds. When a confused mind confronts confused information, confusion in our choices is inevitable. The same problem applies to Buddhist practice. Nowadays we have access to all kinds of Dharma methods, sutras, and treatises. But without sufficient insight to make sound judgments, we end up dabbling everywhere, unable to settle on anything. This is precisely why many people practice for years yet never grasp the essentials.
The key to practice is to have right view firmly in place and to use the mind skillfully. With these two prerequisites, our hearing and contemplation, our actual practice, and our service work can all become genuine practice. Otherwise, they easily become empty formalities. Those who focus on doctrinal study tend to become eloquent talkers who cannot put anything to use; those who focus on practice tend to grope in the dark and veer off course; those who focus on service tend to be swayed by circumstances and lose sight of their original intention. Busy, busy, busy --- they think they are being highly diligent, but in the end none of it has anything to do with liberation. What a pity!
We need to be clear about where the focus of Buddhist practice lies. Once the root is established, the path can unfold. This focus has an outer and an inner dimension.
The outer focus is to rely on the Three Jewels, using them to guide us out of our confused mental tracks. Otherwise, we will mostly just follow our impulses. And what are these impulses? Nothing other than self-grasping, greed, hatred, and ignorance. Following such impulses, life has no way out. So we must take refuge in the Three Jewels with wholehearted sincerity, turning from self-centeredness to centering on the Three Jewels. For those who practice the Pure Land method, this means taking Amitābha Buddha as your refuge. Through a continuous stream of pure mindfulness, your mind resonates with Amitābha's mind. This shift marks the true beginning of Buddhist practice and a change in the course of your life. Centered on the self, you drift through the six realms driven by karma, in endless samsara. Only by centering on the Three Jewels can you walk the path to liberation and awaken to bodhi.
The inner focus is ourselves. That is to say, all study and practice are meant to help us resolve our own problems. The entire Tripitaka --- the twelve divisions of the canon --- and the eighty-four thousand Dharma methods all serve to help us understand and transform ourselves. This is, of course, entirely different from the self-centeredness mentioned above. The former goes along with our existing ordinary mind; the latter is about unlocking the awakened nature inherent within us --- the true treasure of life.
Every day we have countless thoughts --- about work, study, family, and so on. These thoughts arise from causes and conditions; they represent the accumulated deposits of countless lives. The trouble is, they are mostly driven by greed, hatred, and ignorance, and take shape before we even know it. When greed arises, we are swept along by it automatically. We never pause to ask whether this is right or whether there might be another choice --- it is sheer force of habit. You could say that greed, hatred, and ignorance have long become an ordinary being's instinct. If we make no effort to change, everything we think and feel will necessarily follow along with greed, hatred, and ignorance, reinforcing them all the more.
Practice means eliminating deluded thoughts and establishing right mindfulness. The reason we recite the Buddha's name day after day, moment after moment, is to cultivate right mindfulness through repetition. We choose the name of Amitābha as our object, rest our mind there, and sustain the mindfulness moment after moment. Each time you recite the Buddha's name, the right mindfulness associated with Amitābha Buddha is repeated and strengthened once, then hundreds and thousands of times, then trillions of times... Through this continual recollection, this thought will grow stronger and stronger. Correspondingly, other deluded thoughts will lose their chance to surface and gradually weaken.
But recitation alone is not enough. The key is to recite with your whole being --- with a heart of genuine refuge in Amitābha, with an aspiration to leave the Sahā world and be born in the Pure Land. The stronger the force of your mind, the greater the spiritual energy you invest, the more nourishment your thought receives, and the faster it grows. If you merely recite with your lips while your mind wanders --- mouthing the words, fingering the beads, yet inwardly aflutter with deluded thoughts --- there is actually very little power in it. So in the course of reciting the Buddha's name, we must deeply recognize its importance and recollect with full attention. Only then can we build a powerful right mindfulness that becomes the guiding force of our inner world. If right mindfulness lacks strength, what guides us will still be deluded thoughts, greed, hatred, and ignorance.
Ordinary beings mostly live in the world of the deluded mind --- upside-down views and illusory thoughts, each thought steeped in ignorance. Yet the Buddha Dharma tells us that behind the deluded mind there is the true mind: awakened nature, the potential for Buddhahood. These two kinds of mind form the basis of the different qualities of life between ordinary beings and sages. From an ordinary perspective, ordinary beings and sages are worlds apart. Yet from the standpoint of Chan insight, they are but a single thought apart. As it is said, "The previous thought, deluded, is the ordinary being; the subsequent thought, awakened, is the Buddha." Lose touch with your awakened nature, and you are an ordinary being. Realize your awakened nature, and right then and there, you are a Buddha. Of course, this Buddha differs from the Buddhas of the ten directions who have perfected their compassion, wisdom, and merit. But the awakened nature that is realized is the same; the difference lies only in whether it is fully perfected. It is at this level that we say there is no difference among mind, Buddha, and sentient beings.
The *Platform Sutra* also tells us: "The previous thought clinging to objects is affliction; the subsequent thought released from objects is bodhi." Why do we cling to objects? Because the deluded mind is sticky. Moreover, it takes a great heap of mistaken ideas and turbulent emotions to be the "self," developing into what we call the ordinary mind. When such a mind encounters an object, it naturally sticks to it, giving rise to greed or aversion. In truth, this "self" is nothing but a product of ignorance --- it is illusory. Because of it, we must constantly search for support, continually proving it and reinforcing it. And from this arise suffering, birth and death, and samsara.
But at the level of awakened nature, there is no need and none of the fear, loneliness, or any affliction that comes in its wake. Awakened nature has the quality of non-abiding --- like a mirror that clearly reflects mountains and rivers, yet when an object appears, its reflection arises, and when the object departs, the reflection vanishes, leaving no trace of clinging. This is what it means to be released from objects. It is as the *Śūraṅgama Sūtra* describes: "The awakened luminosity, empty and still, is like the clear sky, free of the coarse shadows of past sense-objects. Observing all the lands, rivers, and mountains of the world, it is as a bright mirror reflecting forms."
The Pure Land principle that "it is the mind that recites the Buddha's name, and this very mind is the Buddha" is established precisely on the basis of awakened nature. From this perspective, the Buddha and sentient beings share the same essential nature. Therefore, the mind that recites the Buddha's name, right in that very moment, is the Buddha. But we must be clear: this is by no means the ordinary deluded mind. We study the Buddha Dharma to understand ourselves, to see that our present personality is a product of ignorance. The purpose is to dismantle it and then realize the awakened nature hidden behind the ordinary mind --- and this is precisely the power of liberation.
What the Buddha Dharma calls "illuminating the mind and seeing one's nature" means realizing awakened nature through the stage of seeing. But this is not the end. During the stage of cultivation, we must continue to apply awakened nature and dismantle our habitual patterns. Thus, in the teachings of the scriptural schools, the path goes from the stage of preparation and the stage of accumulation, through the stage of seeing and the stage of cultivation, all the way to the ultimate stage. Only when the ordinary mind is thoroughly dismantled and wisdom is fully perfected can one finally attain Buddhahood. For a practitioner of the Pure Land method, this is expressed as "when the lotus blooms, seeing the Buddha and awakening to the unborn." The main difference from other methods is that the Pure Land method relies more on other-power. Although our afflictions and karma have not yet been fully eradicated, through the receptive power of Amitābha's vows we can be reborn in the Western Pure Land with our karmic residue, continuing our practice in a pure environment without fear of backsliding in samsara. This is the special excellence of the Pure Land method.
Nevertheless, we must also understand that the key to leaving samsara behind is not a matter of time and space. It is about dissolving the confusion and afflictions within our minds, dissolving our mistaken identification of ourselves and the world. That is the real root of samsara. In fact, the mind not only creates birth and death and suffering --- it also possesses the capacity for self-liberation. We need to come to know this capacity and find the key to unlocking it. The Tripitaka and its twelve divisions, the three great traditions of Theravāda, Tibetan, and Chinese Buddhism, the eight major schools --- Pure Land, Chan, Tiantai, and so on --- and all the various Dharma methods: these are all skillful means that the Buddha established for people of different capacities.
But for an individual's practice, what matters most is not knowing the differences between the various methods, but understanding the common core they all share. The reason many people today cannot make progress in practice is precisely that they neglect the foundations. Based on my years of study and practice, I have found that although different methods each have their own emphasis, none can be separated from five essential elements: refuge, aspiration, precepts, right view, and śamatha-vipaśyanā. Grasp these guiding principles, and you have grasped the root of practice. Neglect any one of them, and your practice is bound to be incomplete. Of these five, the first three form the common foundation of all schools, while the latter two represent the distinctive features of each school.
{#二皈-依}
## II. Taking Refuge
The first step in Buddhist practice is taking refuge, and this is what distinguishes a Buddhist from a non-Buddhist. Today's Buddhist world is afflicted by a widespread weakening of faith. In other words, faith does not hold enough weight or standing in people's hearts to keep the ordinary mind in check. At first, we feel that we are practicing Buddhism. But gradually, just as before, we find ourselves putting our faith in money, status, relationships, children, social connections, the idea that power is everything. Why does this happen? Because we lack understanding of the object of our faith; we cannot find a felt connection to the Three Jewels and to practice. When faith cannot become the guiding force within, it is naturally pushed to the margins. This is what lies behind the saying: "Practice Buddhism one year --- the Buddha is right before your eyes. Practice two years --- the Buddha is in the shrine hall. Practice three years --- the Buddha is far off in the west." Unless we make adjustments, the Buddhas and bodhisattvas will drift further and further away, until they are beyond the farthest horizon.
That is why, since 2004, I have made teaching the subject of taking refuge a priority. In my *Handbook for the Study and Practice of Taking Refuge*, I have elaborated in detail on topics such as the place of taking refuge in the Three Jewels within the study and practice of the Buddha Dharma, the causes for taking refuge and how to make the right choice, understanding the Three Jewels, how to take refuge properly, the correct practice of refuge, the precepts related to refuge, the benefits of taking refuge, and the cultivation of refuge. My hope is to help everyone deepen their understanding of the Three Jewels and truly grasp why we take refuge and how to do so in accordance with the Dharma. In addition, I have compiled the *Liturgy for the Cultivation of Taking Refuge* and promoted communal refuge practice. I hope that everyone will make recollection of the Three Jewels a daily commitment, strengthening their presence in your heart through repeated practice.
Faith in Amitābha Buddha and practice of the Pure Land method must likewise be built on the foundation of taking refuge in the Three Jewels. When we choose Amitābha Buddha from among all the Buddhas of the ten directions as our ultimate destination, this is taking refuge in the Buddha. When we rely on the Pure Land method for our practice, this is taking refuge in the Dharma. When we take the Pure Land patriarchs and great masters of successive generations as our teachers and models of practice, this is taking refuge in the Sangha. It can be said that taking refuge represents the most important choice in life.
When we become aware of the confusion in our minds, the suffering of birth and death, and the perils of samsara, how can we gain liberation? Can wealth liberate us? Can status liberate us? In the process of choosing, we discover that only the Three Jewels can lead us to liberation. Although this is our own choice, born of our spiritual need, faith is not the only need in life --- there are also relationships, power, social connections, and so many other needs. Making faith the dominant force in our hearts is no easy task. In this process, we must continually deepen our recognition of the qualities of the Three Jewels and continually practice taking refuge. Otherwise, without reinforcement, this faith will gradually weaken.
For a Pure Land practitioner, the key point in cultivating refuge is to recognize the great vows of Amitābha Buddha and the extraordinary excellence of the Western Pure Land of Ultimate Bliss, to recognize that reciting the Buddha's name can lead us straight out of the three realms and out of samsara. Only with this recognition can we devote ourselves wholeheartedly. If you cannot feel its weight, your heart will easily be carried away by the demands of daily life. So we must strengthen the place of the Three Jewels in our hearts, take refuge in Amitābha Buddha with the utmost sincerity, and continually reflect on the vital importance of reciting the Buddha's name for our lives. Without this kind of analytical meditation, reciting "Amitābha Buddha" with real depth is far from easy.
The three provisions of the Pure Land method are faith, aspiration, and practice. Faith comes first. Faith in what? And on what basis do we believe? If we lack clarity on these questions, our faith is blind and superstitious --- it has no power. There are indeed people whose faculty of faith is exceptionally sharp. When they hear what a virtuous teacher says, they can give rise to deep faith and earnest aspiration, wholeheartedly follow through, and have no need to grasp many principles. But for the majority of people who have received a modern education, it is very difficult to bring forth genuine faith without rational reflection. What is more, simply giving rise to faith is not enough --- you must further reinforce it, letting it grow and become sturdy, like a great towering tree, so that it can abide securely in a mind constantly agitated by habitual patterns and deluded thoughts. Thus, taking refuge is both our starting point for leaving samsara and our assurance of rebirth in the Pure Land.
{#三发-心}
## III. Aspiration
Aspiration is not the exclusive domain of Buddhist practice. In fact, we are setting an aspiration every day --- except that what we set is greed, hatred, and ignorance, and what we ultimately produce is an ordinary person's personality. Now that we have deeply realized the flaws of such a personality, we must begin adjusting from the point of aspiration, transforming the ordinary mind into renunciation and bodhicitta.
What is renunciation? It is to deeply recognize the perils of samsara, with its afflictions and karma, and to resolve to break free from this state. For people today, there seem to be more ways to escape suffering than ever before. Although life is hardly easy, and pressures weigh on us from all sides, we are quite skilled at evading them in various ways --- even to the point of losing ourselves in virtual worlds and refusing to face reality. Yet the truth is, avoidance solves nothing, and virtual worlds are no place to dwell for long. As long as the mind still harbors afflictions, it will keep generating problems and producing suffering.
We keep improving our environment with the aim of relieving suffering, yet this also brings new problems in its wake. For example, we need a car to get around. We earn money, buy a car, and feel happy for a while --- but the troubles that come with the car soon follow. In a life based on affliction and karma, there can be no essential happiness, only a temporary relief from suffering. By essential happiness, I mean a happiness that is joyful whenever and however long you enjoy it, never diminishing, and never turning into sorrow at the peak of joy. Only nirvana is that kind of happiness. The happiness that rests on affliction and karma does not possess these qualities.
Only when we deeply realize that the very nature of samsara is suffering can we stop harboring any expectations about its splendors and genuinely give rise to renunciation. Otherwise, when things are not going our way, we rush to the temple to recite the Buddha's name and practice, seeming to put everything down. But once favorable circumstances return, we plunge right back into worldly life with no hesitation, clinging to everything just as before. That is not renunciation --- it is only a temporary aversion and escape.
In truth, renunciation is a wise, proactive, and courageous choice. It means, after seeing the truth of life clearly, taking the sword of wisdom to cut through attachment to worldly fame, fortune, career, and relationships. Then, with the resolve of a great hero, you practice with vigor, enduring what others cannot endure and doing what others cannot do. Only in this way is there hope for liberation and assurance of rebirth in the Pure Land. Since you no longer crave anything in the world, nothing can sway or disturb you. Rebirth in the Pure Land through reciting the Buddha's name requires faith, aspiration, and practice. The aspiration here is the "aspiration to leave the Sahā world and be born in the Pure Land." Without a strong wish to leave, if you still harbor craving for the world, how can you be reborn in the Pure Land?
Only when you make a clear choice --- the Western Pure Land of Ultimate Bliss is my destination, that alone is my true home, and I have no wish to go anywhere else --- coupled with deep faith in the receptive power of Amitābha Buddha's compassionate vows, and sustained by the provisions of single-minded recitation and active benefitting of others, can you be sure of rebirth. The problem is that many people's faith is impure, their aspiration insufficient, and their practice inadequate. On the surface they seem to recite the Buddha's name every day, but inwardly they still have many attachments, feeling they have not yet enjoyed enough blessings. When temptation comes, they are drawn to other options. At the critical moment of life and death, they are obstructed by the splendors of samsara. How could they possibly be reborn in the Pure Land?
Thus, faith and aspiration are profoundly important. Faith is taking refuge --- it is choosing your support and destination. Aspiration is setting the mind --- it is bringing forth a genuine wish to leave samsara. And bodhicitta is the extension and perfection of renunciation, taking the wish "I want to leave samsara" and extending it to all sentient beings. Not only do you yourself leave, but you extend the wish to others, unable to bear the thought of sentient beings suffering in samsara, resolving to lead them all to liberation together. This broad practice of benefitting others is the bodhisattva path. It not only perfects compassion but also perfects wisdom. These are precisely the two great qualities perfected by the Buddhas and bodhisattvas. A bodhisattva is also called an "awakening being" --- one who brings sentient beings to awakening. If you only think of your own liberation, you can only attain the liberation of a hearer; that is the Śrāvakayāna, not the bodhisattva path.
As a noble wish of altruism, the defining characteristic of bodhicitta is its quality of aspiration, as described in the *Yogācārabhūmi Śāstra*: "Such an aspirant surely seeks unsurpassed bodhi, and seeks to accomplish the welfare of sentient beings. Therefore, the defining characteristic of this aspiration is this determined seeking." From the standpoint of aspiration, it is the same mental process as "I want to buy a house" or "I want to buy a car"; the only difference lies in the content of the wish. The aspiration of ordinary people arises from desire and is instinctive to sentient beings. The aspiration of bodhicitta is for the benefit of others --- it is the wish that "I will benefit all sentient beings and help them all find release from the suffering of samsara."
This raises a question: Why benefit others? What do sentient beings have to do with me? In real life, we feel no connection to many beings and may even dislike them. How do we persuade ourselves to benefit them? This is the difficult point in bringing forth bodhicitta. It must be approached by adjusting our views and mental attitudes. In Master Xing'an's *Essay Exhorting the Arousal of Bodhicitta*, ten reasons for arousing bodhicitta are given. When we reflect on them repeatedly and come to see that these reasons are correct and that this undertaking is meaningful, we can bring forth bodhicitta from the heart. In Master Tsongkhapa's *Lamrim*, the methods of the seven causes and effects and exchanging self and others are used to explain why we should arouse bodhicitta and how to do so. When we accept these perspectives, we accept this choice.
We often think that arousing bodhicitta is merely a practice of benefiting others, related to compassion but not essentially connected to personal liberation. So isn't it enough simply to recite the Buddha's name sincerely? Why help others or do all kinds of altruistic deeds --- isn't that just a waste of time? This kind of thinking has given many Buddhist practitioners a strong self-centered streak and also led the public to perceive Buddhism as disengaged and of no use to society. The root cause is our serious underestimation of the value of benefiting others.
In fact, benefiting others not only nourishes compassion but is also closely connected to liberation. Our present personality --- and indeed our afflictions, birth and death, and samsara --- are all based on self-grasping. Some people recite the Buddha's name but without a correct aspiration, directed entirely toward their own concerns. So whenever they encounter something disagreeable or contrary to their wishes, all kinds of afflictions still arise. The root is precisely self-grasping. If every day you are only thinking of yourself, self-grasping will be continuously reinforced. But the practice of benefiting others can actually weaken self-grasping: you shift your attention from yourself to sentient beings. The more you think of others, the less you think of yourself. However, this only works if your altruism is genuine and not merely seeming. What I call seeming altruism is when you use good deeds to make your self-grasping more refined --- what people in society call "performative" good deeds. If that is what you do, benefiting others will just become another way to strengthen self-grasping.
Bodhicitta must be pure altruism. Whether in motivation or in action, its sole purpose is to benefit sentient beings, without the slightest concern for oneself. When a person is always calculating their own interests, they are plagued by anxiety over gains and losses and burdened with afflictions. But when a person wholeheartedly considers what others need and does what serves them, they actually have no time to be troubled for themselves. In the process, self-grasping naturally weakens, thereby removing the fundamental obstacle to liberation.
Looked at from another angle, although we do possess compassion, it is very narrow. In the course of practicing altruism, when we continually hold the intention to benefit all sentient beings, the heart gradually opens, and compassion grows. Thus, bodhicitta and the cultivation of compassion are mutually reinforcing.
As we know, the "Chapter on the Vows of Samantabhadra" (of the *Avataṃsaka Sūtra*) is a classic text on the teaching of bodhicitta and is also one of the five Pure Land sutras. The text tells us: "All buddhas, the Tathāgatas, have great compassion as their essence. Because of sentient beings, they give rise to great compassion; because of great compassion, they give rise to bodhicitta; because of bodhicitta, they attain perfect awakening." Only with compassion as the foundation can bodhicitta arise, and bodhicitta in turn further perfects compassion. Perfect compassion is impartial and boundless, and this is inseparable from wisdom. So from the standpoint of practice, benefiting others has two meanings: one is benefiting sentient beings and perfecting compassion, and the other is opening up wisdom and moving toward liberation. It is through bodhicitta that wisdom and compassion can continually grow, until at last you attain the great wisdom and great compassion of the Buddhas and bodhisattvas.
If we practice the Pure Land method with bodhicitta, it becomes an important provision for rebirth in the Pure Land. After rebirth, guided by this vow, we can liberate sentient beings throughout the worlds of the ten directions. As the "Chapter on the Vows of Samantabhadra" says, when a person approaches the end of life, "only this king of vows does not abandon them --- at all times it guides them forward. In a single instant they attain rebirth in the Land of Ultimate Bliss, and upon arrival they see Amitābha Buddha... They see themselves born within a lotus flower and receive the Buddha's prophecy of enlightenment. Having received the prophecy, over countless hundreds of thousands of myriads of nayutas of eons, throughout inexpressibly inexpressible worlds in the ten directions, they employ the power of wisdom to benefit sentient beings according to their minds. Before long, they will sit upon the bodhi seat, subdue the army of Māra, attain perfect awakening, and turn the wondrous Dharma wheel. They will cause sentient beings in worlds as numerous as the finest dust particles in a buddha-land to bring forth bodhicitta, and according to their capacities, teach and bring them to maturity, until the end of the ocean of future eons, broadly benefitting all sentient beings."
Why is the "Chapter on the Vows of Samantabhadra" called the "King of the Ten Great Vows"? Because each of these vows takes as its object all the Buddhas of the ten directions and three times, and all sentient beings throughout the entirety of space and the dharma realm. Although many people recite this chapter as part of their morning and evening practice, the emphasis is merely on recitation, without understanding that it contains an extraordinary method of practice. I gave teachings on this chapter back in 1996, later compiled as *A Buddhist Practitioner's Faith*, and have since lectured on it several more times as *The Contemplation Principles of Samantabhadra's Vows*. The reason I value this scripture so highly is that the practice principles it sets forth can serve not only as a preparatory practice for other methods but are themselves the main practice --- the method by which Samantabhadra Bodhisattva attained Buddhahood.
From the standpoint of preparatory practice, the contemplations set forth in the "Chapter on the Vows of Samantabhadra" allow us to swiftly accumulate merit and purify obstacles. They are the primary productive force for attaining Buddhahood. When you recite "Amitābha Buddha" once, or perform any wholesome deed, using the method from this chapter, that single recitation or deed is, in that very moment, everything. It is like multiplying any number by infinity --- the result is infinite. At the same time, the "Chapter on the Vows of Samantabhadra" is also the supreme main practice, grounded in the insight of the Avataṃsaka. The *Avataṃsaka Sūtra* has long been called the king of sutras, and its practice culminates in Samantabhadra's vows and conduct. When I taught *The Contemplation Principles of Samantabhadra's Vows*, I summarized its practice method as: "the unsurpassed contemplation of bodhicitta, the method for copying the qualities of the Buddha." We know that in practicing calligraphy, you copy a model. If you follow the guidance of the "Chapter on the Vows of Samantabhadra" in your contemplation and recitation, you are using your own mind to copy the qualities of the Buddha, gradually tuning it to the frequency of the Buddhas and bodhisattvas.
Why can we tune our minds to the frequency of the Buddhas and bodhisattvas? Because at a certain level of life, sentient beings and the Buddhas and bodhisattvas are no different. It is only because we are lost in ignorance and have fallen into traps of our own making that we have become ordinary beings. The process of copying is precisely the gradual dismantling of the self's constructs and limitations. When these obstacles are completely cleared away and you realize the mind that is selfless, formless, and boundless, you equally perfect omniscience with all the Buddhas of the ten directions. If we did not possess the potential for Buddhahood within, we could never attain it. It is precisely because sentient beings inherently possess the wisdom and virtue of the Tathāgata that they can accomplish Buddhahood through practice.
Bodhicitta is divided into conventional bodhicitta and ultimate bodhicitta. The aspirational bodhicitta discussed above is only conventional bodhicitta. Ultimate bodhicitta is the awakened mind within us. That is the final reality, the priceless treasure within life, and it is what all sentient beings inherently possess. As disciples of the Buddha, no matter what method we practice, the ultimate goal is to recognize the awakened mind and attain liberation and even unsurpassed bodhi.
{#四戒-律}
## IV. Precepts
The precepts are the rules of the road for the mind in the course of practice. Their function is to help us stop the habitual momentum of samsara and protect us as we travel safely along the path of the three fortunate destinies, the path of liberation, and the bodhisattva path. Their first principle is "do no evil," and the basis of evil is greed, hatred, and ignorance. These are powerful inner habitual forces. If we do not deliberately guard against them, we can easily be swept along by them. Only by not falling into our habitual patterns do we have the strength to rest in right mindfulness, cultivate right concentration, and open up our inner awakened nature.
The precepts possess the power to guard against wrongdoing and stop evil. If our motivation when receiving the precepts is correct and the ceremony is properly conducted, we can thereby obtain the essence of the precepts, establishing within ourselves a system of self-restraint and protection. But receiving the precepts is not a once-and-for-all matter. We must also continually uphold them and recollect their merits to reinforce them. The precepts need to be implemented in body, speech, and mind, and applied to every aspect of practice and daily life, until observing the precepts eventually becomes part of our character. Only then can we withstand the unwholesome habitual patterns accumulated since time without beginning and purify our body, mind, and personality.
If we do not take the precepts as our standard, our thoughts, words, and actions will largely be saturated with greed, hatred, and ignorance. On such a mental basis, can we really resonate with the power of Amitābha Buddha's vows? If we cannot, then the so-called recitation is nothing more than a formality of mouthing words without the mind's engagement --- it cannot become a provision for rebirth in the Pure Land. Thus, for the method of reciting the Buddha's name, precepts are also an indispensable foundation.
{#五正-见}
## V. Right View
In terms of reciting the Buddha's name, aside from the distinctive views of the Pure Land method, we must also pay attention to the right view common to all schools. For instance, contemplating the suffering of samsara and the suffering of the three lower realms can help us genuinely give rise to renunciation and cut off greed, hatred, and ignorance. This is what the teaching of the Four Noble Truths conveys: by knowing suffering, one can cut off its causes, aspire to its cessation, and cultivate the path. It can be said that contemplating suffering is the very engine of practice. Contemplating impermanence and no-self tells us that everything from the outer world to our inner body and mind is arising and ceasing moment by moment, impossible to hold onto for even a single day. Only by recognizing the awakened nature behind the deluded mind can we directly see the original face of life. And contemplating that dependent arising is empty by nature helps us recognize that the samsara constructed by ignorance is merely a dream --- an illusory appearance produced by causes and conditions, not truly real. This is what the patriarchs meant by: "In the dream, clearly there are the six destinies; upon awakening, vast emptiness --- not a single world." We find this world so bustling and lovable that we do not want to leave it. Once we see that it is fundamentally absurd and unreal, there is no need to cling to it any longer.
In practicing the method of reciting the Buddha's name, we must deeply recognize that samsara is suffering by nature, recognize the majestic perfection of Amitābha Buddha's myriad virtues, and recognize the incomparable excellence of the Western Pure Land. Only when we are fully equipped with these right views can we invest ourselves wholeheartedly, so that our recitation of the Buddha's name becomes powerful and resonant. The higher our insight, the deeper our resonance with Amitābha Buddha as we recite, the greater our likelihood of rebirth in the Pure Land, and the higher our grade of rebirth. If we recite with an ordinary mind, lacking both insight and the minds of renunciation and bodhicitta, we are merely pronouncing some syllables. If the recitation does not even enter our own hearts, how can it resonate with Amitābha's mind?
{#六止-观}
## VI. Śamatha-Vipaśyanā
The ordinary mind is never truly quiet. Even when not confronted with people or events, thoughts rise and fall one after another. This requires the training of focusing the mind on a single point, keeping it fixed on a wholesome object. Whenever the mind wanders off, bring it back. When it wanders off again, bring it back again. Through repeated training, we gradually calm the restlessness and cultivate sustained, stable concentration. Once we experience this stillness, no matter what we face, we remain unmoving, undisturbed by circumstances.
Take the familiar practice of reciting the Buddha's name. Resting the mind on the Buddha's name is śamatha. On this foundation, each recitation can truly resonate and carry power. Vipaśyanā is the power of clear observation --- it means being lucidly aware throughout the recitation. How do we combine reciting the Buddha's name with the practice of śamatha and vipaśyanā? First, there must be a preparatory stage: contemplate the great significance of a precious human life, contemplate death and impermanence, contemplate the suffering of the three lower realms, and deeply recognize the extraordinary excellence of Amitābha Buddha and the Western Pure Land, giving rise to the powerful aspiration to "leave the Sahā world and be born in the Land of Ultimate Bliss." Then, through cultivating śamatha, recite the Buddha's name with single-minded focus, allowing this right mindfulness to grow stronger day by day, continuing unbroken, until it becomes the dominant force in your life. Finally, through the practice of vipaśyanā, observe that the mind that recites the Buddha's name is intrinsically empty, and that the mind that recites the Buddha's name is itself the Buddha. This is what the patriarchs meant by "it is the mind that recites the Buddha's name, and this very mind is the Buddha." To recite in this way is to resonate with the Buddha in every thought --- it is the supreme practice.
Above, I have shared my reflections on practice, organized around the focus of practice and the five essential elements. I believe these five elements are also highly relevant to the method of reciting the Buddha's name. Today's karmic conditions have been most extraordinary, and I hope my insights may offer you some inspiration.
## Q&A Session
Q: What is the relationship between hearing, contemplating, and practicing in the Chan tradition on the one hand, and faith, aspiration, and practice in the Pure Land method on the other?
A: Hearing, contemplating, and practicing mainly belong to the content of the scriptural schools. They are not something the Chan tradition particularly emphasizes. Of course, Chan also speaks of relying on the teachings to awaken to the source, using hearing and contemplation of the scriptures to support practice, but this is not the main focus. In the scriptural schools, "hearing" means drawing near to virtuous teachers and listening to the true Dharma; "contemplating" means reflecting on it in accordance with principle; "practicing" means cultivating a particular method based on the right view established through reflection, and living under the guidance of that right view.
Faith, aspiration, and practice in the Pure Land method likewise cannot be separated from the foundation of hearing, contemplating, and practicing. Otherwise, if you do not even know of Amitābha Buddha or the Pure Land method, what would you have faith in? Even if you have heard a little, without knowing that Amitābha is the great name of myriad virtues and that the Pure Land method is the shortcut straight out of the three realms, it is still difficult to bring forth faith. And even if you know of Amitābha's merits and the excellence of reciting the Buddha's name, faith will not be firm unless you understand and accept it through reflection and verify it through practice. Thus, hearing, contemplating, and practicing are the indispensable foundation for establishing faith, aspiration, and practice. Apart from this foundation, talk of faith, aspiration, and practice is often hollow.
Q: What is the difference between ignorance and attachment? What is the relationship between fundamental ignorance, derivative ignorance, and the two forms of attachment to self and phenomena?
A: Ignorance is the basis of attachment. The reason we are attached is precisely because of ignorance. Of course, ignorance manifests in many ways --- greed, hatred, ignorance, and the eighty-four thousand afflictions are all products of ignorance. Attachment is one of their most important expressions.
Fundamental ignorance is also called beginningless ignorance. It is innate. Derivative ignorance is that which arises from fundamental ignorance. As for the two forms of attachment to self and phenomena, they are also manifestations of ignorance. In the *Lamrim*, self-grasping and ignorance are even described as two sides of the same coin: from ignorance comes self-grasping and grasping at phenomena. Because we cannot see ourselves clearly, we form mistaken identifications about ourselves --- that is self-grasping; and mistaken identifications about the world --- that is grasping at phenomena. If we could see ourselves and the world clearly, understanding everything with penetrating clarity, there would be no more mistaken identifications, and no more self-grasping or grasping at phenomena.
Q: What is the relationship between renunciation and bodhicitta?
A: In terms of the wish itself, renunciation and bodhicitta are the same --- both are the wish to leave samsara. But they differ in the scope of their object. Renunciation is simply the wish "I want to leave," while bodhicitta not only seeks one's own liberation but also the liberation of all sentient beings. In terms of their mental basis, the two are also the same. True renunciation is a function of the wisdom of emptiness, and bodhicitta likewise rests on the wisdom of emptiness. Without the wisdom of emptiness, a wish that rests only on the ordinary mind cannot bring about ultimate liberation or dissolve affliction and karma. At the conventional level, both renunciation and bodhicitta are wishes. At the ultimate level, both are the wisdom of emptiness, both are awakening. The awakening spoken of in Buddhism includes not only the unsurpassed bodhi attained by the Buddhas and bodhisattvas, but also the bodhi of the hearers and the bodhi of the solitary realizers.
Q: What direction should the development of contemporary Buddhism take --- toward Humanistic Buddhism or toward mountain-hermitage Buddhism?
A: The development of Buddhism cannot go exclusively toward engagement in the world, nor can it all retreat into the mountain forests. If the latter, then who would propagate the Dharma? What would become of the vast numbers of sentient beings? Looked at from another angle, without the soil of the broader society, the Buddha's original intention in establishing the teachings would be lost, and Buddhism could not survive. At the same time, going out into the world cannot be separated from quiet mountain cultivation.
Seclusion in stillness allows you to face yourself directly; active service allows you to test and refine your mind through actual encounters. Donglin Temple's retreat center is excellent. We can come here for a period of retreat practice, then roll back into the worldly dust for a while. Both dimensions are necessary for practice. Engaging in service work is a process of cultivating bodhicitta --- you can use benefiting others to dismantle your habitual patterns and at the same time examine yourself: Does my right mindfulness have any real strength? Are greed, hatred, and ignorance still strong? If there is anything at all that can disturb us, it shows that the corresponding affliction is still at work within --- and that is precisely where practice should begin. Otherwise, nothing in this world could ever disturb us.
Q: Why is the Pure Land method promoted in the Dharma-ending age? Why are the capacities of sentient beings most suited to the Pure Land school rather than the Chan or Vajrayana schools?
A: The propagation of the Buddha Dharma should be pluralistic. Of course, the Pure Land method has a vast following in China and needs fine practice centers like Donglin Temple to propagate it. But the other schools are equally important. The reason the Buddha established the eighty-four thousand Dharma methods is precisely that sentient beings have different capacities. In today's pluralistic society, every school has its value. If Pure Land centers propagate the Pure Land school well, Chan centers propagate the Chan school well, and Yogācāra centers propagate the Yogācāra school well, that is a blessing for all sentient beings. Because sentient beings have different capacities, they need different methods to guide and gather them in. Only in this way can Buddhism develop comprehensively and healthily. That is why I do not advocate promoting only one school. Any practice center that propagates a particular school correctly and in accordance with the Dharma deserves our rejoicing and admiration.
Q: Many Buddhist practitioners seek only worldly blessings and think that the Pure Land or the Buddha is invisible. How can we bring them to the Dharma?
A: It is true that some Buddhist practitioners seek only worldly blessings. This requires targeted guidance. Given the kind of education modern people receive, if you talk to them directly about samsara or the Western Pure Land of Ultimate Bliss, they will find it hard to accept and may even regard it as superstition. Under these circumstances, we can introduce them to Humanistic Buddhism first --- Do you want to live well in this life? To be happy? Buddhism is the great wisdom of life. It can guide us to dispel our afflictions and make our present life happier. Once they are willing to accept the Buddha Dharma, we can then go further and introduce the deeper teachings on renunciation, bodhicitta, and the Western Pure Land.
When the Buddha taught, he would often "first speak of the path of upright conduct, then speak of the essentials of the true Dharma." If sentient beings want blessings, tell them how to attain blessings. Once they have blessings and realize that blessings alone are not enough, it becomes easier for them to accept the Dharma. It is like people who, when poor, think that money is everything, only to find after becoming wealthy that they are still suffering, and then begin searching for new solutions. The current wave of interest in traditional Chinese culture and Buddhist studies illustrates this point. Many people are no longer satisfied with worldly blessings and have begun to ask, "What is happiness?" "Who am I?" "What is the point of living?" When they start asking these questions, to then introduce the Buddha Dharma is to follow their line of thought, give them what they need, and appeal to what they seek. The effect will naturally be different.
Q: How do we bring the Buddha Dharma into our daily lives?
A: On the one hand, you must let the wisdom of the Dharma truly become your own view. As for the Dharma teachings on the precious human life, impermanence and no-self, and causes, conditions, and effects --- after hearing them, we still need to reflect on them deeply before we can understand them. Only when we recognize that what the Dharma says is the truth of the world can we accept it wholeheartedly and make it our own view. In that case, the Dharma will naturally enter your life. Many people study the Buddha Dharma and know quite a few principles, but when they face actual problems, they still fall back on their old ingrained views --- "The Dharma is the Dharma; I am still me." This gap between knowing and doing comes from not having truly "known" --- from not having transformed concepts into views.
On the other hand, you should establish a healthy lifestyle in accordance with the Buddha's teachings. Under the guidance of the precepts, concentration, and wisdom and the Noble Eightfold Path, receive and uphold the precepts and earn a right livelihood. At the same time, set aside time every day for meditation or reciting the Buddha's name, and maintain the clear illumination of wisdom. If you can do all this, the Buddha Dharma will surely enter your life.
Q: My attachment to my parents is too deep --- how can I learn to hold it lightly?
A: Attachment is the habitual pattern of ordinary beings. Attachment to parents, in particular, is the closest bond and the most tenacious. How to resolve this? On the one hand, from the perspective of samsara, we recognize that our relationship with our parents is also dependently arisen. At the same time, we recognize that clinging to this relationship does no good for either side. Only by guiding our parents toward the Buddha Dharma and transforming this worldly bond into a pure Dharma connection is the truest way to repay their kindness. On the other hand, shift the emphasis of your affection onto your faith. Turn from self-centeredness to centering on the Three Jewels --- this can weaken attachment to worldly relationships. In practicing the Pure Land method, we should establish our reliance on Amitābha Buddha and the Land of Ultimate Bliss.
Of course, we must also be mindful of the approach. Some people, after taking up Buddhist practice, neglect their family and career, and in the end bring many obstacles upon themselves. As lay practitioners, we need to fulfill our worldly responsibilities. As parents, be good parents; as children, be good children. This is what Master Yinguang meant by "fulfilling your roles and doing your part." In the course of being with family, we are both meeting our responsibilities and cultivating bodhicitta. If we are to have compassion for all sentient beings, we should begin with our parents and siblings. If we have no compassion for our own immediate family, how can we have compassion for all beings? Of course, this is not the love of human attachment but the great love of compassion --- begin with those closest to you, then extend it to more and more people. As long as you do this with bodhicitta, these efforts will also become provisions for rebirth in the Pure Land. They are not in conflict with practice.
## Concluding Remarks by Master Da'an
I believe that everyone who has listened to Venerable Master Jiqun's teaching has received great benefit. I myself have benefited enormously. It truly seems to me that the Master has expressed the profound Buddha Dharma with extraordinary precision, using modern language that everyone can understand. For Pure Land practitioners, he has also clearly explained how the common-path practices of upholding precepts, bodhicitta, and right view relate to the method of reciting the Buddha's name. It calls to mind what Master Ouyi said: the Pure Land method "horizontally shares the same ground with all Dharma methods, yet vertically stands apart from all Dharma methods." Sometimes we emphasize the "standing apart" dimension while forgetting the "sharing the same ground" dimension. In truth, the shared ground is the foundation. It is not the case that just because you recite the Buddha's name and rely on other-power, you can set aside the bodhisattva path of the common Mahayana. In the process of reciting the Buddha's name, we must value the common-path curriculum --- the foundation of the bodhi path --- while at the crucial point of rebirth, we rely entirely on other-power. Only in this way will our practice of the Pure Land method be balanced and integrated.
Venerable Master Jiqun's perspective on the pluralistic development of Buddhism is also excellent. The eighty-four thousand Dharma methods were established to meet the diverse capacities of sentient beings. Every practice center has its own orientation in practice and can develop its own distinctive style, allowing all eight Mahayana schools to bloom and bear fruit for the benefit of sentient beings. From the standpoint of Donglin Temple's orientation, we focus exclusively on practicing and propagating the Pure Land method. But toward Chan, Vinaya, and scriptural-school centers, we should offer our rejoicing and admiration. Only with this understanding and this breadth of heart can we jointly uphold the course of the Dharma. I hope that after hearing these teachings, everyone will reflect on them deeply and put them into action.