# Review Findings for 70【佛法要领】 Reviewer: model (self) Date: 2026-08-07 Scope: full read of source.dj and target.dj; spot-verified all long paragraph tails for omissions. Reference: edit-suggestions.dj (2026-08-06, prior pass; findings below are net-new). ## Summary Completeness is excellent: every source paragraph, verse, and anecdote is present and in order (verified 1:1 line alignment and tails of all long paragraphs). Register and fluency are consistently good. No meaning-reversing mistranslations and no omissions were found. The findings below are one wrong Sanskrit gloss, one logical slip, one repeated grammar error in the root verse, and a set of small terminology / fluency polish items. ## Critical None. ## Major ### M1. Wrong Sanskrit gloss for 三有 (three existences) Location: §2.4, target line 257 — "Why are the three realms called the three existences (*triloka*)?" 三有 = trīṇi bhavāni / *tribhava* (the three states of existence); *triloka* = 三界 (the three realms). The gloss contradicts the next sentence, which correctly glosses 有 as *bhava*. The error is translator-added (the source gives no Sanskrit), so it injects a factual mistake into the commentary. Fix: change "the three existences (*triloka*)" to "the three existences (*tribhava*)", or drop the parenthetical and keep only the (*bhava*) gloss in the following sentence. ### M2. Tautological sentence loses the 相对/究竟/胜义 distinction Location: §4 intro, target line 423 — "Bodhicitta is of two types: one is relative, the other ultimate. ... Ultimate bodhicitta, on the other hand, can only be revealed after realizing emptiness, and is also known as ultimate bodhicitta." Source: 菩提心有两种,一种是相对的,一种是究竟的。…是相对的菩提心。而究竟的菩提心…又称胜义菩提心。 The final clause names a *different* term (胜义菩提心) as a synonym; the translation repeats "ultimate bodhicitta", producing a tautology and losing the 世俗/胜义 (conventional/ultimate) pair — a distinction the text itself relies on in §5.1, where 世俗菩提心 is rendered "conventional bodhicitta". Fix: "Bodhicitta is of two types: relative and ultimate. Arousing the wish 'I want to become a buddha, I want to benefit all living beings' is relative bodhicitta. Ultimate bodhicitta, which can only be revealed after realizing emptiness, is also known as absolute bodhicitta (*pāramārthika-bodhicitta*)." Optionally align §5.1's "conventional bodhicitta" with a parenthetical: "relative (conventional) bodhicitta". ### M3. Broken possessive in the root verse, repeated four times Location: target lines 157, 303, 313, 327 — "Because craving for existence' pleasures binds all beings..." "existence' pleasures" is not a valid English possessive. It appears in the root verse block in the Prologue, at the opening of §3, at the opening of §3.1, and in the §3.1 commentary quote — i.e. in the most-read lines of the book. Fix (all four occurrences): "Because craving for the pleasures of existence binds all beings, first you must seek renunciation." (Source: 由欲有乐缚众生,故先寻求出离心。) ## Minor ### Accuracy / terminology 1. **"life's brevity" for 寿无常** — target lines 159, 305, 351 and commentary line 357. 寿无常 is the *impermanence* of life (lifespan), not merely its brevity; the following commentary on death's certainty/uncertainty depends on the impermanence sense. Fix: "life's impermanence" (verse: "This precious human life so hard to find, and life's impermanence---..."). 2. **"a child of the Mahayana" for 大乘佛子** — target line 431. 佛子 = child of the Buddha; the translation drops 佛. Fix: "Only when you have aroused bodhicitta are you a Mahayana child of the Buddha; otherwise, you belong to the Hinayana." 3. **"an awakened being" for 觉有情** — target line 429. The folk etymology the author invokes is "awakened *sentient* being" (bodhi + sattva). Fix: "A bodhisattva is also called an awakened sentient being." 4. **"Prajñāpāramitā Madhyamaka view of emptiness" for 般若中观的空性见** — target line 649 (end of §5.2). 般若 here is prajñā (the three prajñās were just discussed); inflating it to Prajñāpāramitā over-specifies. Fix: "the prajñā–Madhyamaka view of emptiness". 5. **"Our great teacher, the Buddha" for 我佛大沙门** — target line 559 (§5.1). Drops 大沙门 (great śramaṇa). Fix: "Our Buddha, the great Śramaṇa, always taught in this way." 6. **"Buddhism calls our living body the five aggregates"** — target line 277 (§2.4). 生命体 is the whole psycho-physical being; "living body" obscures that four of the five aggregates are mental (which the next sentences explain). Fix: "Buddhism calls our mind-body continuum the five aggregates." Also "the present living body" later in the same paragraph → "the present mind-body". 7. **"the three higher realms" for 三善道** — target line 129 (§1.3). Standard rendering is "the three fortunate realms" (or "happy realms"). "Higher" is intelligible but nonstandard. Fix: "the results of the three fortunate realms". 8. **"self-liberated solitary" for 自了汉** — target line 439 (§4). Coinage is unclear; 自了汉 = one concerned only with their own liberation. Fix: "such a person becomes one who seeks only their own liberation". 9. **"Lamp for the Path to Enlightenment" for 《菩提道灯论》** — target line 213 (§2.2). The standard English title of Atiśa's *Bodhipathapradīpa* is *A Lamp for the Path to Awakening*. Using "Awakening" also avoids overloading "Enlightenment" (already used in the *Stages of the Path* titles). Fix: "his *Lamp for the Path to Awakening*". 10. **Sutra-title diacritics inconsistent** — "*Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch*" (lines 87, 91) and "(Lotus Sutra)" (line 99) lack the diacritic used everywhere else (*Diamond Sūtra*, *Heart Sūtra*, *Lotus Sūtra* at lines 439, 451, 453, *Nirvāṇa Sūtra*). Fix: *Platform Sūtra of the Sixth Patriarch* and "(Lotus Sūtra)". ### Fluency / register 11. **"arise from causes and their results without exception"** — verse rendering of 从因生果皆不虚 (target lines 171, 529, 535 area). Reads as if things "arise from causes and results"; 不虚 = unfailing. Fix: "arise from causes as results, unfailingly" (cf. the commentary's own cleaner phrasing "all arise from causes and produce results. This is genuinely true."). 12. **"the low-level repetition of life"** — target line 331 (§3.1), for 生命的低级重复. "Low-level" suggests technical/low-priority in English. Fix: "a base, mechanical repetition of life" or "life's dreary repetition". 13. **"a capacity for non-adhesion"** — target line 385 (§3.3), for 不粘著的能力. "Non-adhesion" is a physical-materials term. Fix: "a capacity for non-attachment" (keeps parallel with the surrounding "does not stick" imagery, which works well). 14. **"The trouble is precisely that we cannot die."** — target line 567 (§5.1). Intended: death offers no escape from karma (麻烦就在于死不了). As written it reads as a complaint about immortality. Fix: "The trouble is precisely that we cannot simply die and be done with it." 15. **"The theme lecture for this Bodhi Meditation Retreat has chosen..."** — target line 51 (opening paragraph). A lecture cannot "choose"; the speaker chooses. Fix: "For the keynote lecture of this Bodhi Meditation Retreat, I have chosen Master Tsongkhapa's *Song of the Three Principal Aspects of the Path*." 16. **"day and night the wish for liberation never leaves your mind"** — verse (lines 161, 307, 369), for 昼夜唯求解脱心. Slight drift: the verse is about *seeking only* liberation day and night, not about the wish merely persisting. Fix: "and day and night you long for liberation alone". ## Notes (no action needed) - Terminology is otherwise consistent throughout: 出离心 = renunciation, 菩提心 = bodhicitta, 空性见 = the view of emptiness, 我执/法执 = self-grasping / dharma-grasping, 缘起 = dependent origination, 止观 = śamatha-vipaśyanā, 暇满人身 = precious human life (with "leisure and endowment" given at first explanation), 三苦 = suffering of suffering / of change / pervasive suffering of conditioning (standard rendering). - 小乘 = Hinayana is used consistently and matches the unapologetic 小乘 of the source; retained as-is. - Section renumbering (### 解脱道和菩萨道 → ### 1.2., etc.) and ToC conversion to a flat bullet list are clean and consistent. - edit-suggestions.dj (2026-08-06) remains accurate: "Jiechuang Buddhist Studies Institute" (line 673) is in place; none of its open items conflict with the findings above.